Literature DB >> 33099661

Spread Patterns of Antibiotic Resistance in Faecal Indicator Bacteria Contaminating an Urbanized Section of the Brda River.

Łukasz Kubera1.   

Abstract

This paper presents the spatio-temporal distribution of faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in the river section subject to anthropogenic stress and describes spread patterns of antibiotic resistance in the studied bacterial groups. The analysis involved 58 strains of Escherichia coli and 61 strains of enterococci. Antibiotic resistance profiles were prepared in accordance with the recommendations of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). The results indicated a correlation between the location of a sampling site and the concentration of faecal bacteria. The highest average concentrations were recorded at the site located in the city centre, where the river is used mainly for recreation. Antibiotic resistance profiles showed that Escherichia coli had 100% sensitivity to tigecycline, levofloxacin and imipenem. The highest percentaage of strains (17%) were resistant to piperacillin. Enterococci were 100% sensitive to levofloxacin. No strains were vancomycin-resistant (VRE). The highest percentage of strains was resistant to imipenem (23%), and the lowest, to ampicillin (2%). The spatio-temporal distribution of antibiotic-resistant strains (ARS) indicated a high concentration of drug-resistant Escherichia coli (47%) in the summer season at the sampling site located in the last part of the river. At the same time, drug resistance in enterococci increased along the river course and was considerably higher in spring. There were no significant relationships between physico-chemical parameters of water and the levels of faecal bacteria. On the other hand, strong relationships were observed between the percentage of strains showing resistance to the applied antibiotics and physico-chemical and biological parameters of water. The percentage of antibiotic resistant strains of Escherichia coli was negatively correlated with dissolved oxygen concentration (r = - 0.9; p < 0.001) and BOD5 (r = - 0.85; p < 0.05). The percentage of antibiotic resistant strains of enterococci was most strongly correlated with water pH (r = - 0.92; p < 0.001).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial resistance; Enterococci; Escherichia coli; Faecal bacteria; River pollution

Year:  2020        PMID: 33099661      PMCID: PMC7982388          DOI: 10.1007/s00248-020-01624-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  27 in total

1.  Comment on "Estimating the infection risk in recreational waters from the faecal indicator concentration and from the ratio between pathogens and indicators".

Authors:  C N Haas
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Meteorological effects on the levels of fecal indicator bacteria in an urban stream: a modeling approach.

Authors:  Kyung Hwa Cho; Sung Min Cha; Joo-Hyon Kang; Seung Won Lee; Yongeun Park; Jung-Woo Kim; Joon Ha Kim
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 3.  Understanding the contribution of environmental factors in the spread of antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Stephanie Fletcher
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.674

4.  Occurrence of antimicrobial resistance bacteria in the Yodo River basin, Japan and determination of beta-lactamases producing bacteria.

Authors:  Naoyuki Yamashita; Yohei Katakawa; Hiroaki Tanaka
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 6.291

5.  Evaluation of the distribution of fecal indicator bacteria in a river system depending on different types of land use in the southern watershed of the Baltic Sea.

Authors:  Anna Gotkowska-Płachta; Iwona Gołaś; Ewa Korzeniewska; Józef Koc; Andrzej Rochwerger; Kamil Solarski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  The prevalence and antimicrobial resistance phenotypes of Salmonella, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus sp. in surface water.

Authors:  S Cho; C R Jackson; J G Frye
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 2.858

7.  Total resistance of native bacteria as an indicator of changes in the water environment.

Authors:  Monika Harnisz
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 8.  Environmental factors influencing the development and spread of antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Johan Bengtsson-Palme; Erik Kristiansson; D G Joakim Larsson
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 16.408

9.  Predicting biochemical oxygen demand in European freshwater bodies.

Authors:  Olga Vigiak; Bruna Grizzetti; Angel Udias-Moinelo; Michela Zanni; Chiara Dorati; Fayçal Bouraoui; Alberto Pistocchi
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Faecal Indicator Bacteria and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Marine Coastal Waters: Is there a Relationship?

Authors:  Adriana P Januário; Clélia N Afonso; Susana Mendes; Maria J Rodrigues
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2019-12-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.