Yan Li1, Guangliang Gao1,2, Yu Lin1, Silu Hu1, Yi Luo1, Guosong Wang1,3, Long Jin1, Qigui Wang2, Jiwen Wang1, Qianzi Tang1, Mingzhou Li1. 1. Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, No.211 Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, China. 2. Institute of Poultry Science, Chongqing Academy of Animal Science, No. 51 Changlong Avenue, Rongchang District, Chongqing 402460, China. 3. Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, 2471 TAMU, College Station, Texas 77843, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The domestic goose is an economically important and scientifically valuable waterfowl; however, a lack of high-quality genomic data has hindered research concerning its genome, genetics, and breeding. As domestic geese breeds derive from both the swan goose (Anser cygnoides) and the graylag goose (Anser anser), we selected a female Tianfu goose for genome sequencing. We generated a chromosome-level goose genome assembly by adopting a hybrid de novo assembly approach that combined Pacific Biosciences single-molecule real-time sequencing, high-throughput chromatin conformation capture mapping, and Illumina short-read sequencing. FINDINGS: We generated a 1.11-Gb goose genome with contig and scaffold N50 values of 1.85 and 33.12 Mb, respectively. The assembly contains 39 pseudo-chromosomes (2n = 78) accounting for ∼88.36% of the goose genome. Compared with previous goose assemblies, our assembly has more continuity, completeness, and accuracy; the annotation of core eukaryotic genes and universal single-copy orthologs has also been improved. We have identified 17,568 protein-coding genes and a repeat content of 8.67% (96.57 Mb) in this genome assembly. We also explored the spatial organization of chromatin and gene expression in the goose liver tissues, in terms of inter-pseudo-chromosomal interaction patterns, compartments, topologically associating domains, and promoter-enhancer interactions. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first chromosome-level assembly of the goose genome. This will be a valuable resource for future genetic and genomic studies on geese.
BACKGROUND: The domestic goose is an economically important and scientifically valuable waterfowl; however, a lack of high-quality genomic data has hindered research concerning its genome, genetics, and breeding. As domestic geese breeds derive from both the swan goose (Anser cygnoides) and the graylag goose (Anser anser), we selected a female Tianfu goose for genome sequencing. We generated a chromosome-level goose genome assembly by adopting a hybrid de novo assembly approach that combined Pacific Biosciences single-molecule real-time sequencing, high-throughput chromatin conformation capture mapping, and Illumina short-read sequencing. FINDINGS: We generated a 1.11-Gb goose genome with contig and scaffold N50 values of 1.85 and 33.12 Mb, respectively. The assembly contains 39 pseudo-chromosomes (2n = 78) accounting for ∼88.36% of the goose genome. Compared with previous goose assemblies, our assembly has more continuity, completeness, and accuracy; the annotation of core eukaryotic genes and universal single-copy orthologs has also been improved. We have identified 17,568 protein-coding genes and a repeat content of 8.67% (96.57 Mb) in this genome assembly. We also explored the spatial organization of chromatin and gene expression in the goose liver tissues, in terms of inter-pseudo-chromosomal interaction patterns, compartments, topologically associating domains, and promoter-enhancer interactions. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first chromosome-level assembly of the goose genome. This will be a valuable resource for future genetic and genomic studies on geese.
Authors: Derek M Bickhart; Benjamin D Rosen; Sergey Koren; Brian L Sayre; Alex R Hastie; Saki Chan; Joyce Lee; Ernest T Lam; Ivan Liachko; Shawn T Sullivan; Joshua N Burton; Heather J Huson; John C Nystrom; Christy M Kelley; Jana L Hutchison; Yang Zhou; Jiajie Sun; Alessandra Crisà; F Abel Ponce de León; John C Schwartz; John A Hammond; Geoffrey C Waldbieser; Steven G Schroeder; George E Liu; Maitreya J Dunham; Jay Shendure; Tad S Sonstegard; Adam M Phillippy; Curtis P Van Tassell; Timothy P L Smith Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Alexander Dobin; Carrie A Davis; Felix Schlesinger; Jorg Drenkow; Chris Zaleski; Sonali Jha; Philippe Batut; Mark Chaisson; Thomas R Gingeras Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Guojie Zhang; Cai Li; Qiye Li; Bo Li; Denis M Larkin; Chul Lee; Jay F Storz; Agostinho Antunes; Matthew J Greenwold; Robert W Meredith; Anders Ödeen; Jie Cui; Qi Zhou; Luohao Xu; Hailin Pan; Zongji Wang; Lijun Jin; Pei Zhang; Haofu Hu; Wei Yang; Jiang Hu; Jin Xiao; Zhikai Yang; Yang Liu; Qiaolin Xie; Hao Yu; Jinmin Lian; Ping Wen; Fang Zhang; Hui Li; Yongli Zeng; Zijun Xiong; Shiping Liu; Long Zhou; Zhiyong Huang; Na An; Jie Wang; Qiumei Zheng; Yingqi Xiong; Guangbiao Wang; Bo Wang; Jingjing Wang; Yu Fan; Rute R da Fonseca; Alonzo Alfaro-Núñez; Mikkel Schubert; Ludovic Orlando; Tobias Mourier; Jason T Howard; Ganeshkumar Ganapathy; Andreas Pfenning; Osceola Whitney; Miriam V Rivas; Erina Hara; Julia Smith; Marta Farré; Jitendra Narayan; Gancho Slavov; Michael N Romanov; Rui Borges; João Paulo Machado; Imran Khan; Mark S Springer; John Gatesy; Federico G Hoffmann; Juan C Opazo; Olle Håstad; Roger H Sawyer; Heebal Kim; Kyu-Won Kim; Hyeon Jeong Kim; Seoae Cho; Ning Li; Yinhua Huang; Michael W Bruford; Xiangjiang Zhan; Andrew Dixon; Mads F Bertelsen; Elizabeth Derryberry; Wesley Warren; Richard K Wilson; Shengbin Li; David A Ray; Richard E Green; Stephen J O'Brien; Darren Griffin; Warren E Johnson; David Haussler; Oliver A Ryder; Eske Willerslev; Gary R Graves; Per Alström; Jon Fjeldså; David P Mindell; Scott V Edwards; Edward L Braun; Carsten Rahbek; David W Burt; Peter Houde; Yong Zhang; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Erich D Jarvis; M Thomas P Gilbert; Jun Wang Journal: Science Date: 2014-12-11 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Cole Trapnell; Brian A Williams; Geo Pertea; Ali Mortazavi; Gordon Kwan; Marijke J van Baren; Steven L Salzberg; Barbara J Wold; Lior Pachter Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2010-05-02 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Nariman Battulin; Veniamin S Fishman; Alexander M Mazur; Mikhail Pomaznoy; Anna A Khabarova; Dmitry A Afonnikov; Egor B Prokhortchouk; Oleg L Serov Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Yashar S Niknafs; Balaji Pandian; Hariharan K Iyer; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Matthew K Iyer Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 28.547