Literature DB >> 33098889

Postobturation Pain Associated with Tricalcium Silicate and Resin-based Sealer Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Heng Seh Gabriel Tan1, Kian Chong Lim1, Jeen Nee Lui2, Wei Ming Clement Lai1, Victoria Soo Hoon Yu3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of immediate postobturation pain associated with 2 sealer techniques was compared and potential prognostic factors identified.
METHODS: Patients referred for endodontic treatment were recruited with informed consent. Root canals were debrided and teeth rendered asymptomatic before random allocation to receive TotalFill BC (FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) or AH Plus sealer (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). Patients blinded to the sealer reported their postobturation pain experience 1, 3, and 7 days after treatment. Blinded and calibrated assessors independently reviewed treatment quality, sealer extrusion, and radiographic data under standardized conditions.
RESULTS: One hundred sixty eligible patients (163 teeth, 95.3%) returned their pain diary. No postobturation pain difference was found between the 2 sealers (P > .05), although the AH Plus sealer technique was significantly associated with extrusion beyond the apex (P < .05; odds ratio [OR] = 3.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-6.57). Thirty-three (20.6%) patients reported pain on day 1 (median 1 = very mild pain), 16 (10.0%) on day 3 (median 1 = very mild pain), and 9 (5.6%) on day 7 (median 2 = mild pain). The prognostic factors were as follows: (1) moderate/severe preoperative pain (OR = 4.41; 95% CI, 1.42-13.76 on day 3 and OR = 5.16; 95% CI, 1.17-22.78 on day 7), (2) provoked preoperative pain (OR = 4.24; 95% CI, 1.40-12.78 on day 3 and OR = 5.35; 95% CI, 1.27-22.51 on day 7), (3) pulpless tooth (OR = 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02-0.57 on day 3), and (4) sonic activation during treatment (OR = 3.02; 95% CI, 1.39-6.57 on day 1 and OR = 3.01; 95% CI, 1.05-8.59 on day 3).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in pain experience between teeth filled using AH Plus or TotalFill BC Sealer 1, 3, and 7 days after obturation. Patient- and treatment-related factors could influence postobturation pain.
Copyright © 2020 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Postobturation pain; resin-based sealer; tricalcium silicate sealer

Year:  2020        PMID: 33098889     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  4 in total

Review 1.  Present status and future directions: Hydraulic materials for endodontic use.

Authors:  Josette Camilleri; Amre Atmeh; Xin Li; Nastaran Meschi
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.165

2.  Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers Do Not Reduce the Risk and Intensity of Postoperative Pain after Root Canal Treatment when Compared with Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Emílio Carlos Sponchiado Junior; Walbert de Andrade Vieira; Ana Gabriela Costa Normando; Juliana Vianna Pereira; Caio Cezar Randi Ferraz; José Flávio A Almeida; Marina Angélica Marciano; Brenda P F A Gomes; Adriana de-Jesus-Soares
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2021-03-23

Review 3.  Clinical and Radiographic Outcome of Non-Surgical Endodontic Treatment Using Calcium Silicate-Based Versus Resin-Based Sealers-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Viresh Chopra; Graham Davis; Aylin Baysan
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-04-07

4.  Pilot Evaluation of Sealer-Based Root Canal Obturation Using Epoxy-Resin-Based and Calcium-Silicate-Based Sealers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Minju Song; Min-Gyu Park; Sang-Won Kwak; Ruben H Kim; Jung-Hong Ha; Hyeon-Cheol Kim
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.748

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.