Literature DB >> 33098853

Twelve-month prescribing of contraceptive pill, patch, and ring before and after a standardized electronic medical record order change.

Suji Uhm1, Melissa J Chen1, Erika D Cutler2, Mitchell D Creinin3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the proportion of 12-month contraceptive pill, patch, and ring prescriptions before and after an institution-wide change of default electronic medical record facility orders to dispensing 12-month supply. STUDY
DESIGN: This retrospective pre-post study compares outpatient contraception prescriptions from August 10, 2019 through April 9, 2020 obtained from our institutional electronic medical record prescription database. On December 10, 2019, we facilitated a change in the default orders for dispensing self-administered hormonal contraceptives from one-month to 12-months. We evaluated the primary outcome of 12-month supply prescriptions during the four months before and after the change. We also compared 12-month supply prescriptions for pills, patch, and ring by prescriber specialty and location.
RESULTS: The dataset included 4897 distinct evaluable prescriptions for the pill, patch, or ring, with an overall increase in 12-month prescriptions from 260/2437 (10.7%) to 669/2460 (27.2%) after the order change (p < 0.001). Twelve-month pill prescriptions increased from 238/2250 (10.6%) to 607/2250 (27.0%) (p < 0.001), patch prescriptions from 6/40 (15.0%) to 21/44 (47.7%) (p = 0.002), and ring prescriptions from 16/147 (10.9%) to 41/165 (24.8%) (p = 0.001). Twelve-month prescriptions increased after the order change among all provider types at the medical center campus (194/594 [32.7%] to 329/623 [52.8%], p < 0.001). At community clinics, non-obstetrics/gynecology providers increased 12-month prescriptions after the order change (58/1616 [3.6%] to 327/1612 [20.3%], p < 0.001), but obstetrics/gynecology providers did not (8/227 [3.5%] to 13/225 [5.8%], p = 0.27).
CONCLUSION: Providers more frequently prescribed a 12-month supply of contraceptive pills, patches, and rings after a change in the default dispensing quantity in electronic medical record orders. IMPLICATIONS: Institution-wide changes to the electronic medical record default facility order settings can increase 12-month supply contraceptive prescriptions. As a 12-month prescription order represents only one step of many in obtaining a 12-month contraception supply, additional research is required to elucidate and remove other potential barriers.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth control; California legislation; Contraception; Electronic medical record; Extended supply; Prescription

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33098853      PMCID: PMC7736567          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  8 in total

1.  Why do women miss oral contraceptive pills? An analysis of women's self-described reasons for missed pills.

Authors:  Janice D Smith; Deborah Oakley
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Implications of dispensing self-administered hormonal contraceptives in a 1-year supply: a California case study.

Authors:  Sara B McMenamin; Shana Alex Charles; Nadia Tabatabaeepour; Erin Shigekawa; Garen Corbett
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Number of oral contraceptive pill packages dispensed and subsequent unintended pregnancies.

Authors:  Diana Greene Foster; Denis Hulett; Mary Bradsberry; Philip Darney; Michael Policar
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  The effect of pack supply on oral contraceptive pill continuation: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Katharine O'Connell White; Carolyn Westhoff
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Number of oral contraceptive pill packages dispensed, method continuation, and costs.

Authors:  Diana Greene Foster; Ram Parvataneni; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Carrie Lewis; Mary Bradsberry; Philip Darney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2016.

Authors:  Kathryn M Curtis; Tara C Jatlaoui; Naomi K Tepper; Lauren B Zapata; Leah G Horton; Denise J Jamieson; Maura K Whiteman
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2016-07-29

7.  Current Contraceptive Use and Variation by Selected Characteristics Among Women Aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013.

Authors:  Kimberly Daniels; Jill Daugherty; Jo Jones; William Mosher
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2015-11-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.