Literature DB >> 33098527

Lies, Damn Lies, and Bad Statistics?

Italo Braghetto1, Manuel Figueroa2.   

Abstract

A wide spectrum of research such as experimental, randomized trials, cohort or epidemiological studies, technical or control case reports, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses has resulted in a huge amount of publications. These studies and publications may be subject to errors due to poor application of statistical tests, which can lead to misinformation, misinterpretation, and erroneous conclusions, sometimes even considered as lies. In this article, some ideas about this issue are discussed in order to adopt new directions in the future and thus avoid lies and bad statistics.

Keywords:  Publications; Statistic

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33098527     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-04470-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  2 in total

Review 1.  Lies, damned lies and statistics: Clinical importance versus statistical significance in research.

Authors:  Craig Mellis
Journal:  Paediatr Respir Rev       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.726

2.  Statistical significance versus clinical relevance.

Authors:  Marieke H C van Rijn; Anneke Bech; Jean Bouyer; Jan A J G van den Brand
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.992

  2 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Overall Reporting Descriptions of Acupuncture for Chronic Pain in Randomized Controlled Trials in English Journals.

Authors:  Na Zhang; Jian-Feng Tu; Ying Lin; Jin-Ling Li; Xuan Zou; Yu Wang; Hewen Li; Xiao-Ya Wei; Li-Qiong Wang; Guang-Xia Shi; Shi-Yan Yan; Cun-Zhi Liu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.133

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.