Cyril Guetari1, Maud Creze2, Marc Soubeyrand3. 1. Public Assistance Hospital of Paris, Ecole de Chirurgie, 7 rue du Fer à Moulin, 75221, Paris, France. 2. Department of Radiology, Public Assistance Hospital of Paris, Universitary Hospital of Bicêtre, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinique Saint Jean L'Ermitage, 272 Av MArc Jacquet, 77000, Melun, France. prmarcsoubeyrand@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The proximal radioulnar joint (PRUJ) and the radiocapitellar joint may be destabilized after trauma. Different techniques for stabilization of PRUJ have been proposed, but none of them can stabilize the radiocapitellar joint at the same time. We propose a ligamentoplasty to stabilize the radial head at these two joints by reconstructing the radial head annular ligament and the lateral collateral ulnar ligament (LCUL) with a single graft (palmaris longus or gracilis tendon of the knee). METHODS: Fifteen cadaveric upper limbs were used to compare the stabilization obtained by performing our ligamentoplasty with the palmaris longus or the gracilis tendon. For each technique, the stabilization obtained was evaluated by measuring the displacement of the radial head in the anterior, lateral and posterior directions when a force of 1 N was applied in maximum supination, neutral rotation and maximum pronation. We also evaluated whether this technique could damage the ulnar nerve or the posterior interosseous nerve by dissecting them and whether it could limit the range of rotation of the forearm. RESULTS: Our ligamentoplasty enables to restore PRUJ stability equivalent to the intact ligament condition. The palmaris longus was inconstant (13/15) and too short to allow concomitant reconstruction of the LCUL (except in one case). No nerve damage was found during the dissection, and the range of rotation of the forearm was not limited by the ligamentoplasty. We also report a clinical case with an excellent result and without complications. CONCLUSION: This ligamentoplasty we have described makes it possible to stabilize the radial head with respect to the radial notch of the ulna and with respect to the capitellum of the humerus. The gracilis tendon is more suitable than the palmaris longus because of its constant presence and length. A clinical series is now necessary to better evaluate this technique.
PURPOSE: The proximal radioulnar joint (PRUJ) and the radiocapitellar joint may be destabilized after trauma. Different techniques for stabilization of PRUJ have been proposed, but none of them can stabilize the radiocapitellar joint at the same time. We propose a ligamentoplasty to stabilize the radial head at these two joints by reconstructing the radial head annular ligament and the lateral collateral ulnar ligament (LCUL) with a single graft (palmaris longus or gracilis tendon of the knee). METHODS: Fifteen cadaveric upper limbs were used to compare the stabilization obtained by performing our ligamentoplasty with the palmaris longus or the gracilis tendon. For each technique, the stabilization obtained was evaluated by measuring the displacement of the radial head in the anterior, lateral and posterior directions when a force of 1 N was applied in maximum supination, neutral rotation and maximum pronation. We also evaluated whether this technique could damage the ulnar nerve or the posterior interosseous nerve by dissecting them and whether it could limit the range of rotation of the forearm. RESULTS: Our ligamentoplasty enables to restore PRUJ stability equivalent to the intact ligament condition. The palmaris longus was inconstant (13/15) and too short to allow concomitant reconstruction of the LCUL (except in one case). No nerve damage was found during the dissection, and the range of rotation of the forearm was not limited by the ligamentoplasty. We also report a clinical case with an excellent result and without complications. CONCLUSION: This ligamentoplasty we have described makes it possible to stabilize the radial head with respect to the radial notch of the ulna and with respect to the capitellum of the humerus. The gracilis tendon is more suitable than the palmaris longus because of its constant presence and length. A clinical series is now necessary to better evaluate this technique.
Entities:
Keywords:
Elbow instability; Elbow ligamentoplasty; Proximal radioulnar joint; Radial head