Literature DB >> 33098449

The effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on infection rates in mohs micrographic surgery: a single-institution retrospective study.

Oliver Taylor1, Jeffrey Niu Li1, Christian Carr1, Antonio Garcia1, Sophia Tran1, Divya Srivastava1, Rajiv I Nijhawan2.   

Abstract

As data and recommendations regarding antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery vary, we tried to describe the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) in Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) on infective endocarditis, prosthetic joint infection, and surgical site infection using a single-institution retrospective cohort study of antibiotic use (pre-/intra-operative, post-operative or none) among 2,364 patient encouters treated with MMS. Bivariate logistic regression was evaluated for associations between patient and operative characteristics, antibiotic use, and infectious complications. 85.8% of patients received no AP, 10.0% received post-operative AP, and 4.1% received pre-/intra-operative AP. The overall surgical site infection (SSI) rate was 1.3%. SSI did not differ between patients who received pre-/intra-operative prophylaxis, post-operative prophylaxis or no antibiotics. One patient receiving pre-/intra-operative prophylaxis developed SSI. Repairs involving porcine xenografts and interpolation/pedicle flaps were associated with increased SSI. In addition, there were no patients who post-operatively experienced an infected joint or infective endocarditis. Limitations include selection bias, use of observational retrospective data, low infection rates, single institution analysis, and possible omission of explanatory variables or confounders. There was no difference in rates of SSI when comparing MMS patients who received pre-/intra-operative, post-operative or no AP. There were no cases of infective endocarditis or infected prosthetic joint.
© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic; Dermatologic surgery; Infection; Mohs micrographic surgery; Prophylaxis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33098449     DOI: 10.1007/s00403-020-02153-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res        ISSN: 0340-3696            Impact factor:   3.017


  17 in total

1.  Heightened infection-control practices are associated with significantly lower infection rates in office-based Mohs surgery.

Authors:  Julie E Martin; Lark-Aeryn Speyer; Chrysalyne D Schmults
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.398

2.  Infectious complications and antibiotic use in dermatologic surgery.

Authors:  Eva A Hurst; Roy C Grekin; Siegrid S Yu; Isaac M Neuhaus
Journal:  Semin Cutan Med Surg       Date:  2007-03

3.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery: advisory statement 2008.

Authors:  Tina I Wright; Larry M Baddour; Elie F Berbari; Randall K Roenigk; P Kim Phillips; M Amanda Jacobs; Clark C Otley
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 4.  New WHO recommendations on intraoperative and postoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective.

Authors:  Benedetta Allegranzi; Bassim Zayed; Peter Bischoff; N Zeynep Kubilay; Stijn de Jonge; Fleur de Vries; Stacey M Gomes; Sarah Gans; Elon D Wallert; Xiuwen Wu; Mohamed Abbas; Marja A Boermeester; E Patchen Dellinger; Matthias Egger; Petra Gastmeier; Xavier Guirao; Jianan Ren; Didier Pittet; Joseph S Solomkin
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  Association of Postoperative Antibiotics With Surgical Site Infection in Mohs Micrographic Surgery.

Authors:  Ethan C Levin; Conroy Chow; Zaineb Makhzoumi; Chengshi Jin; Stephen C Shiboski; Sarah T Arron
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.398

6.  Use of Antibiotics for Dermatologic Procedures From 2008 to 2016.

Authors:  John S Barbieri; Jeremy R Etzkorn; David J Margolis
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 10.282

7.  Prospective study of wound infections in Mohs micrographic surgery using clean surgical technique in the absence of prophylactic antibiotics.

Authors:  Heather D Rogers; Edward B Desciak; Rebecca P Marcus; Shuang Wang; Julian MacKay-Wiggan; Yehuda D Eliezri
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 11.527

8.  Antibiotic prophylaxis guideline awareness and antibiotic prophylaxis use among New York State dermatologic surgeons.

Authors:  Noah Scheinfeld; Shari Struach; Bonnie Ross
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.398

9.  Adverse events associated with mohs micrographic surgery: multicenter prospective cohort study of 20,821 cases at 23 centers.

Authors:  Murad Alam; Omer Ibrahim; Michael Nodzenski; John M Strasswimmer; Shang I Brian Jiang; Joel L Cohen; Brian J Albano; Priya Batra; Ramona Behshad; Anthony V Benedetto; C Stanley Chan; Suneel Chilukuri; Courtney Crocker; Hillary W Crystal; Anir Dhir; Victoria A Faulconer; Leonard H Goldberg; Chandra Goodman; Steven S Greenbaum; Elizabeth K Hale; C William Hanke; George J Hruza; Laurie Jacobson; Jason Jones; Arash Kimyai-Asadi; David Kouba; James Lahti; Kristi Macias; Stanley J Miller; Edward Monk; Tri H Nguyen; Gagik Oganesyan; Michelle Pennie; Katherine Pontius; William Posten; Jennifer L Reichel; Thomas E Rohrer; James A Rooney; Hien T Tran; Emily Poon; Diana Bolotin; Meghan Dubina; Natalie Pace; Natalie Kim; Wareeporn Disphanurat; Ummul Kathawalla; Rohit Kakar; Dennis P West; Emir Veledar; Simon Yoo
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 10.282

10.  Effect of a single prophylactic preoperative oral antibiotic dose on surgical site infection following complex dermatological procedures on the nose and ear: a prospective, randomised, controlled, double-blinded trial.

Authors:  Helena Rosengren; Clare F Heal; Petra G Buttner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Skin substitutes for the management of mohs micrographic surgery wounds: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kimberly W Lu; Amor Khachemoune
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.017

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.