Ganna Blazhenets1, Lars Frings2, Arnd Sörensen2, Philipp T Meyer. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany ganna.blazhenets@uniklinik-freiburg.de. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Abstract
Voxel-based principal-component analysis allows for an identification of patterns of glucose metabolism and amyloid deposition related to the conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer disease (AD). The present study aimed to validate these AD conversion-related patterns (ADCRPs) against neuropathologic findings. Methods: We included patients from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative who underwent autopsy and for whom 18F-FDG PET (30 AD, 6 MCI, 2 cognitively normal) and amyloid-β (Aβ) PET (17 AD, 3 MCI, 2 cognitively normal) were available. Pattern expression scores (PESs) of the 18F-FDG- and Aβ-ADCRP were compared with Braak tangle stage and Thal amyloid phase, respectively. Mean 18F-FDG uptake and mean 18F-AV-45 SUV ratio (SUVr) in regions of hypometabolism and elevated amyloid load typical of AD, respectively, were used as volume-of-interest-based PET measures. The diagnostic performance for identifying none-to-low vs. intermediate-to-high AD neuropathologic change (ADNC) was assessed for all biomarkers. Results: We observed significant associations between PES of 18F-FDG-ADCRP and Braak stage (ρ > 0.48, P < 0.005) and between PES of Aβ-ADCRP and Thal phase (ρ > 0.66, P < 0.001). PES of 18F-FDG-ADCRP, PES of Aβ-ADCRP, and their combination identified intermediate-to-high ADNC with an area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.80, 0.95, and 0.98 (n = 22), respectively. Mean 18F-FDG uptake and mean 18F-AV-45 SUVr in AD-typical regions were also significantly associated with Braak stage (|ρ| > 0.45, P < 0.01) and Thal phase (ρ > 0.55, P < 0.01), respectively. Volume-of-interest-based PET measures discriminated between ADNC stages with an AUC of 0.79, 0.88, and 0.90 for mean 18F-FDG uptake, mean 18F-AV-45 SUVr, and their combination (n = 22), respectively. Contemplating all subjects with available 18F-FDG PET and neuropathology information (n = 38), PES of 18F-FDG-ADCRP was a significant predictor of intermediate-to-high ADNC (AUC = 0.72), whereas mean 18F-FDG uptake was not (AUC = 0.66), although the difference between methods was not significant. Conclusion: PES of 18F-FDG-ADCRP, a measure of neurodegeneration, shows close correspondence with the extent of tau pathology, as assessed by Braak tangle stage. PES of Aβ-ADCRP is a valid biomarker of underlying amyloid pathology, as demonstrated by its strong correlation with Thal phase. The combination of ADCRPs performed better than 18F-FDG-ADCRP alone, although there was only negligible improvement compared with Aβ-ADCRP.
Voxel-based principal-component analysis allows for an identification of patterns of glucose metabolism and amyloid deposition related to the conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer disease (AD). The present study aimed to validate these AD conversion-related patterns (ADCRPs) against neuropathologic findings. Methods: We included patients from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative who underwent autopsy and for whom 18F-FDG PET (30 AD, 6 MCI, 2 cognitively normal) and amyloid-β (Aβ) PET (17 AD, 3 MCI, 2 cognitively normal) were available. Pattern expression scores (PESs) of the 18F-FDG- and Aβ-ADCRP were compared with Braak tangle stage and Thal amyloid phase, respectively. Mean 18F-FDG uptake and mean 18F-AV-45 SUV ratio (SUVr) in regions of hypometabolism and elevated amyloid load typical of AD, respectively, were used as volume-of-interest-based PET measures. The diagnostic performance for identifying none-to-low vs. intermediate-to-high AD neuropathologic change (ADNC) was assessed for all biomarkers. Results: We observed significant associations between PES of 18F-FDG-ADCRP and Braak stage (ρ > 0.48, P < 0.005) and between PES of Aβ-ADCRP and Thal phase (ρ > 0.66, P < 0.001). PES of 18F-FDG-ADCRP, PES of Aβ-ADCRP, and their combination identified intermediate-to-high ADNC with an area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.80, 0.95, and 0.98 (n = 22), respectively. Mean 18F-FDG uptake and mean 18F-AV-45 SUVr in AD-typical regions were also significantly associated with Braak stage (|ρ| > 0.45, P < 0.01) and Thal phase (ρ > 0.55, P < 0.01), respectively. Volume-of-interest-based PET measures discriminated between ADNC stages with an AUC of 0.79, 0.88, and 0.90 for mean 18F-FDG uptake, mean 18F-AV-45 SUVr, and their combination (n = 22), respectively. Contemplating all subjects with available 18F-FDG PET and neuropathology information (n = 38), PES of 18F-FDG-ADCRP was a significant predictor of intermediate-to-high ADNC (AUC = 0.72), whereas mean 18F-FDG uptake was not (AUC = 0.66), although the difference between methods was not significant. Conclusion: PES of 18F-FDG-ADCRP, a measure of neurodegeneration, shows close correspondence with the extent of tau pathology, as assessed by Braak tangle stage. PES of Aβ-ADCRP is a valid biomarker of underlying amyloid pathology, as demonstrated by its strong correlation with Thal phase. The combination of ADCRPs performed better than 18F-FDG-ADCRP alone, although there was only negligible improvement compared with Aβ-ADCRP.
Authors: Peter T Nelson; Irina Alafuzoff; Eileen H Bigio; Constantin Bouras; Heiko Braak; Nigel J Cairns; Rudolph J Castellani; Barbara J Crain; Peter Davies; Kelly Del Tredici; Charles Duyckaerts; Matthew P Frosch; Vahram Haroutunian; Patrick R Hof; Christine M Hulette; Bradley T Hyman; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Kurt A Jellinger; Gregory A Jicha; Enikö Kövari; Walter A Kukull; James B Leverenz; Seth Love; Ian R Mackenzie; David M Mann; Eliezer Masliah; Ann C McKee; Thomas J Montine; John C Morris; Julie A Schneider; Joshua A Sonnen; Dietmar R Thal; John Q Trojanowski; Juan C Troncoso; Thomas Wisniewski; Randall L Woltjer; Thomas G Beach Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Lars Frings; Sabine Hellwig; Timo S Spehl; Tobias Bormann; Ralph Buchert; Werner Vach; Lora Minkova; Bernhard Heimbach; Stefan Klöppel; Philipp T Meyer Journal: Brain Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Renaud La Joie; Nagehan Ayakta; William W Seeley; Ewa Borys; Adam L Boxer; Charles DeCarli; Vincent Doré; Lea T Grinberg; Eric Huang; Ji-Hye Hwang; Milos D Ikonomovic; Clifford Jack; William J Jagust; Lee-Way Jin; William E Klunk; Julia Kofler; Orit H Lesman-Segev; Samuel N Lockhart; Val J Lowe; Colin L Masters; Chester A Mathis; Catriona L McLean; Bruce L Miller; Daniel Mungas; James P O'Neil; John M Olichney; Joseph E Parisi; Ronald C Petersen; Howard J Rosen; Christopher C Rowe; Salvatore Spina; Prashanthi Vemuri; Victor L Villemagne; Melissa E Murray; Gil D Rabinovici Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Clifford R Jack; David A Bennett; Kaj Blennow; Maria C Carrillo; Billy Dunn; Samantha Budd Haeberlein; David M Holtzman; William Jagust; Frank Jessen; Jason Karlawish; Enchi Liu; Jose Luis Molinuevo; Thomas Montine; Creighton Phelps; Katherine P Rankin; Christopher C Rowe; Philip Scheltens; Eric Siemers; Heather M Snyder; Reisa Sperling Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Dietmar Rudolf Thal; Alicja Ronisz; Thomas Tousseyn; Ajeet Rijal Upadhaya; Karthikeyan Balakrishnan; Rik Vandenberghe; Mathieu Vandenbulcke; Christine A F von Arnim; Markus Otto; Thomas G Beach; Johan Lilja; Kerstin Heurling; Aruna Chakrabarty; Azzam Ismail; Christopher Buckley; Adrian P L Smith; Sathish Kumar; Gill Farrar; Jochen Walter Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 7.801