Alexandre Hideo-Kajita1, Hector M Garcia-Garcia2, Rodrigo Rubarth3, Samuel Wopperer1, Yuichi Ozaki1, Antonio Fernando Diniz Freire4, Rafael Cavalcante4, Marcio Bittencourt5, Kazuhiro Dan1, Thais L Pinheiro4, Breno A A Falcão6, Joao Luis A Falcao6, Paulo Soares4, Expedito Ribeiro4, Carlos E Rochitte4, Pedro Alves Lemos7. 1. MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Interventional Cardiology Department, USA. 2. MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Interventional Cardiology Department, USA. Electronic address: Hector.M.GarciaGarcia@medstar.net. 3. Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA. 4. Instituto do Coração (InCor), Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 5. Center for Clinical and Epidemiological Research and Division of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 6. Hospital Do Coração De Messejana, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. 7. Instituto do Coração (InCor), Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: pedro.lemos@einstein.br.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) provides a non-invasive assessment of the coronary artery tree. Computed Tomography - adapted Leaman Score (CT-LeSc) has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiac events in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with a score greater than 5 (high). PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between CT-LeSc and the progression of CAD and to provide vessel- and segment-level CAD qualification and quantification at baseline and 7-year follow-up. METHODS: Patients with multivessel CAD and CCTA assessments at baseline and follow-up were included. The CT-LeSc analysis was performed in a paired fashion. The patient-level scores and the differences between each phase were assessed by 2 analysts in an independent core laboratory. RESULTS: This study analyzed 248 coronary segments from 17 patients with a mean follow-up interval of 7.5 ± 0.6 years. The mean CT-LeSc at baseline and follow-up were 14.6 ± 4.2 and 16.9 ± 1.5, respectively, with an absolute increase of 2.3 ± 1.8. The mean cumulative increase of new lesions was 0.2 ± 0.2 per year. Over time, 14.6% of the non-obstructive lesions became obstructive, and 15.0% of the non-calcified plaques became calcified. There were 29 new lesions found at follow-up, and out of these, 16 were obstructive and 19 were non-calcified. CONCLUSION: In patients at high risk for cardiac events, as determined by CT-LeSc, there was an increase in CT-LeSc, obstructive lesions, and calcified plaques over the 7-year follow-up period. Most of the new lesions were obstructive and non-calcified. This is the first report showing long-term serial imaging CCTA changes in a high-risk population.
BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) provides a non-invasive assessment of the coronary artery tree. Computed Tomography - adapted Leaman Score (CT-LeSc) has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiac events in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with a score greater than 5 (high). PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between CT-LeSc and the progression of CAD and to provide vessel- and segment-level CAD qualification and quantification at baseline and 7-year follow-up. METHODS:Patients with multivessel CAD and CCTA assessments at baseline and follow-up were included. The CT-LeSc analysis was performed in a paired fashion. The patient-level scores and the differences between each phase were assessed by 2 analysts in an independent core laboratory. RESULTS: This study analyzed 248 coronary segments from 17 patients with a mean follow-up interval of 7.5 ± 0.6 years. The mean CT-LeSc at baseline and follow-up were 14.6 ± 4.2 and 16.9 ± 1.5, respectively, with an absolute increase of 2.3 ± 1.8. The mean cumulative increase of new lesions was 0.2 ± 0.2 per year. Over time, 14.6% of the non-obstructive lesions became obstructive, and 15.0% of the non-calcified plaques became calcified. There were 29 new lesions found at follow-up, and out of these, 16 were obstructive and 19 were non-calcified. CONCLUSION: In patients at high risk for cardiac events, as determined by CT-LeSc, there was an increase in CT-LeSc, obstructive lesions, and calcified plaques over the 7-year follow-up period. Most of the new lesions were obstructive and non-calcified. This is the first report showing long-term serial imaging CCTA changes in a high-risk population.