| Literature DB >> 33097015 |
Ivana Bozicevic1, Ariyaratne Manathunge2, Sriyakanthi Beneragama2, Chathrini Gadjaweera2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are limited data globally on HIV in men who engage in casual and transactional sex with female tourists.Entities:
Keywords: HIV; Sri Lanka; Tourists; Transactional sex
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33097015 PMCID: PMC7585175 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09699-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Comparison of indicators related to sexual behaviours and testing for HIV in beach boys in Galle; Integrated HIV bio-behavioural surveys carried out in 2015 and 2018
| 2015 | 2018 | X2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n/ N | % (95% CI)a | n/ N | % (95% CI) | |||
| Used condom at last sex with a casual partner | 211/292 | 67.1 (60.2–72.8) | 264/364 | 76.7 (72.8–80.7) | 0.01 | 0.939 |
| Last casual sexual partner’s HIV status unknown | 179/292 | 60.7 (54.9–66.5) | 249/366 | 70.6 (66.0–75.2) | 3.24 | 0.071 |
| Used condom at last sex with a regular partner | 130/ 206 | 61.2 (53.2–68.3) | 124/223 | 58.3 (51.3–65.8) | 2.50 | 0.114 |
| Last regular partner’s HIV status unknown | Not available | 48/224 | 22.1 (17.4–26.9) | |||
| Used condom at last sex with a tourist | 212/298 | 67.6 (61.8–73.3) | 259/362 | 75.3 (71.3–79.4) | 0.01 | 0.909 |
| Used condom at last sex for which money was received | 49/97 | 49.3 (39.1–59.1) | 120/158 | 77.0 (70.1–83.9) | 17.40 | < 0.001 |
| Used condom at last sex for which money was given | 44/71 | 60.1 (46.7–72.8) | 101/142 | 70.7 (60.3–80.7) | 1.83 | 0.176 |
| Was paid for sex at last sex with a tourist | 82/290 | 25.6 (20.7–30.3) | 93/366 | 24.4 (20.2–28.5) | 0.67 | 0.410 |
| Ever tested for HIV | 28/306 | 10.4 (6.7–14.5) | 117/336 | 35.3 (29.3–41.3) | 60.42 | |
| Discussed HIV with any sexual partner (among those who heard of HIV) | ||||||
| Yes, all | 8/211 | 3.3 (1.1–5.4) | 2/249 | 0.4 (0–7.4) | 54.52 | < 0.001 |
| Yes, some | 58/211 | 25.2 (19.4–30.2) | 13/249 | 4.7 (3.0–7.1) | ||
| No, none | 141/211 | 69.3 (63.7–75.6) | 215/249 | 85.6 (81.3–89.6) | ||
| Don’t know | 4/211 | 2.3 (0.2–4.5) | 19/249 | 9.2 (5.7–13.1) | ||
Totals vary because of missing data or subgroup analysis
X2 = chi-square test
aWeighted population estimates and confidence intervals (CI)
Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of correlates of never being tested for HIV among beach boys in Galle, 2018
| n/N | OR (95% CI) | aOR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | |||||
| 18–24 | 64/102 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 25–40 | 92/157 | 0.84 (0.50–1.40) | 0.505 | 0.83 (0.45–1.54) | 0.561 |
| ≥ 41 | 63/77 | 2.67 (1.32–5.41) | 0.006 | 0.98 (0.39–2.43) | 0.965 |
| Employment status | |||||
| In paid work | 98/177 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Occasional or no work | 110/146 | 2.46 (1.53–3.98) | < 0.001 | 1.44 (0.79–2.59) | 0.229 |
| Partnership status | |||||
| Living together with a partner/spouse | 95/140 | 1.0 | – | ||
| In a stable relationship but not living together | 26/46 | 0.62 (0.31–1.21) | 0.164 | ||
| Not in a stable relationship | 98/150 | 0.89 (0.55–1.46) | 0.649 | ||
| Knowledge of HIVa | |||||
| Score 0–4 | 175/217 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Score 5 (All answers correct) | 38/113 | 0.12 (0.07–0.20) | < 0.001 | 0.19 (0.11–0.33) | < 0.001 |
| Number of partners in the past 12 months | |||||
| 1–2 | 51/55 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3–4 | 43/61 | 0.19 (0.06–0.60) | 0.005 | 0.28 (0.07–1.07) | 0.06 |
| > 5 | 125/220 | 1.10 (0.04–0.29) | < 0.001 | 0.31 (0.09–1.06) | 0.0 |
| Used condom at last sex with a tourist | |||||
| Yes | 115/222 | 1 | 1 | ||
| No | 95/103 | 11.05 (5.13–23.82) | < 0.001 | 4.33 (1.76–10.68) | < 0.001 |
| Paid at last sex with a tourist | |||||
| No | 168/247 | 1 | |||
| Yes | 47/82 | 0.63 (0.38–1.05) | 0.08 | – | |
| Gender of tourists that beach boys have sex with | |||||
| Only women | 195/294 | 1 | |||
| Both men and women, or only men | 20/37 | 0.60 (0.30–1.19) | 0.14 | – | |
OR odds ratio, aOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence intervals
aHIV knowledge was assessed according to the guidelines for Global AIDS Monitoring for the year 2018. This indicator is constructed from responses to a set of five questions: „Score 5″ was given to those who answered correctly to all five questions, while “score 0–4” was given to those with at least one incorrect answe