| Literature DB >> 33096696 |
Eunji Cho1, Oh-Seok Kwon2, Beomkoo Chung1, Jayho Lee1, Jeongyoon Sun1, Jongheon Shin2, Ki-Bong Oh1.
Abstract
A marine-derived actinomycete (Streptomyces sp. MBTI36) exhibiting antibacterial activities was investigated in the present study. The strain was identified using genetic techniques. The 16S rDNA sequence of the isolate indicated that it was most closely related to Streptomyces microflavus. Furthermore, a new chromomycin A9 (1), along with chromomycin Ap (2), chromomycin A2 (3), and chromomycin A3 (4), were isolated from the ethyl acetate extract. Their structures were determined using extensive spectroscopic methods including 1D and 2D NMR, and HRMS, as well as comparisons with previously reported data. Compounds 1-4 showed potent antibacterial activities against Gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). During a passage experiment, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for compounds 1-4 showed no more than a 4-fold increase from the starting MIC value, indicating that no resistance was detected over the 21 passages.Entities:
Keywords: MRSA; Streptomyces microflavus; antimicrobial activity; chromomycins; marine actinomycete; resistance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33096696 PMCID: PMC7588889 DOI: 10.3390/md18100522
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of strain MBTI36 based on 16S rDNA sequence. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA-X software (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis, version 10) and bootstrap was replicated a thousand times. The Kimura two-parameter model considering transversional and transitional substitution rates was used to measuring distance. Bar indicates 10 nucleotide substitutions per 1000 sites. T: type strain.
Figure 2The structures of compounds 1–4.
13C and 1H NMR assignments for compound 1 in CDCl3 a.
| Position | δC, Type | δH ( | Position | δC, Type | δH ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 202.3, C | 4- | |||
| 2 | 76.1, CH | 4.72, d (11.4) | B1 | 95.4, CH | 5.11, br s |
| 3 | 44.0, CH | 2.60, m | B2 | 33.7, CH2 | 1.76, m; 1.73, m |
| 4 | 27.1, CH2 | 3.10, m | B3 | 66.0, CH | 3.96, m |
| 2.67, dd (16.6, 3.5) | B4 | 81.7, CH | 3.22, d (2.8) | ||
| 5 | 101.0, CH | 6.64, s | B5 | 66.9, CH | 3.87, q (6.6) |
| 6 | 159.9, C | B6 | 17.4, CH | 1.28, d (6.3) | |
| 7 | 111.9, C | B4-OCH3 | 62.6, CH3 | 3.60, s | |
| 8 | 156.3, C | ||||
| 9 | 165.5, C | C1 | 100.5, CH | 5.10, dd (9.7, 1.3) | |
| 10 | 117.2, CH | 6.75, s | C2 | 37.7, CH2 | 2.48, m; 1.70, m |
| 4a | 134.8, C | C3 | 82.5, CH | 3.61, m | |
| 8a | 108.3, C | C4 | 75.3, CH | 3.12, m | |
| 9a | 108.3, C | C5 | 72.3, CH | 3.38, m | |
| 10a | 138.6, C | C6 | 18.2, CH3 | 1.35, d (5.6) | |
| 7-CH3 | 8.4, CH3 | 8.40, s | |||
| 8-OH | 9.81, s | D1 | 99.9, CH | 4.60, dd (9.6, 1.7) | |
| 1′ | 82.0, CH | 4.70, d (1.5) | D2 | 37.3, CH2 | 2.28, m; 1.70, m |
| 2′ | 211.3, C | D3 | 80.9, CH | 3.50, m | |
| 3′ | 78.3, C | 4.22, br s | D4 | 75.4, CH | 3.12, m |
| 4′ | 68.1, C | 4.36, m | D5 | 72.5, CH | 3.30, m |
| 5′ | 20.8, CH3 | 1.37, d (5.6) | D6 | 18.0, CH3 | 1.24, d (6.1) |
| 1′-OCH3 | 59.9, CH3 | 3.52, s | |||
| 4- | E1 | 97.3, CH | 5.02, dd (3.6, 1.8) | ||
| A1 | 97.6, C | 5.21, dd (9.7, 2.0) | E2 | 43.9, CH2 | 2.04, m; 2.00, m |
| A2 | 33.2, CH2 | 2.19, m; 2.05, m | E3 | 70.8, C | |
| A3 | 70.2, CH | 3.98, m | E4 | 79.9, CH | 4.61, d (9.3) |
| A4 | 67.2, CH | 5.18, d (2.9) | E5 | 67.2, CH | 3.98, m |
| A5 | 70.0 | 3.82, q (6.5) | E6 | 18.0, CH3 | 1.38, d (5.4) |
| A6 | 17.0, C | 1.28, d (6.3) | E3-CH3 | 23.2, CH3 | 1.35, s |
| 174.6, C | 171.7, C | ||||
| CO | 27.8, CH2 | 2.46, q (7.5) | CO | 21.1, CH3 | 2.14, s |
| COCH2 | 9.7, CH3 | 1.19, t (7.5) | |||
a 13C and 1H NMR data were obtained at 100 and 400 MHz, respectively.
Figure 3Key correlations of COSY (bold) and HMBC (arrows) experiments for compound 1.
Results of antimicrobial activity test.
| Compound | MIC (μg/mL) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram (+) Bacteria | Gram (−) Bacteria | Fungi | ||||||||
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | |
|
| 0.03 | 0.5 | 0.13 | 0.5 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 |
|
| 0.13 | 0.5 | 0.13 | 1 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 |
|
| 0.06 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.5 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 |
|
| 0.13 | 0.5 | 0.13 | 0.5 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 |
| Ampicillin | 0.06 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 128 | 32 | ||||
| Tetracycline | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
| Amphotericin B | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
A: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25923, B: Enterococcus faecium ATCC19434, C: Enterococcus faecalis ATCC19433, D: Salmonella enterica ATCC14028, E: Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC10031, F: Escherichia coli ATCC25922, G: Candida albicans ATCC10231, H: Aspergillus fumigatus HIC6094, I: Trichophyton rubrum NBRC9185, J: Trichophyton mentagrophytes IFM40996.
Antibacterial activities of compounds 1–4 against MSSA and MRSA strains.
| Microorganism | MIC (μg/mL) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dap | Van | Pla | Lin | Cip | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| CCARM0027 | 8 | 0.5 | 4 | 2 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
| CCARM0204 | 2 | 0.25 | 4 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.06 |
| CCARM0205 | 1 | 0.13 | 2 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| CCARM3640 | 8 | 0.25 | 4 | 2 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
| CCARM3089 | >32 | 1 | 8 | 2 | >32 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| CCARM3090 | >32 | 1 | 8 | 1 | >32 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| CCARM3634 | >32 | 0.5 | 8 | 2 | >32 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
| CCARM3635 | >32 | 1 | 8 | 2 | >32 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
| ATCC43300 | >32 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
| ATCC700787 | >32 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.13 |
| ATCC700788 | >32 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 16 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Dap: daptomycin, Van: vancomycin, Pla: platensimycin, Lin: Linezolid, Cip: ciprofloxacin.
Figure 4Resistance acquisition during 21 serial passaging (21 days) in the presence of sub-MIC (0.5 × the MIC determined from the previous passage) levels of ciprofloxacin, chromomycin A9 (1), Ap (2), A2 (3), and A3 (4) for S. aureus ATCC43300. The y axis is the highest concentration the cells grew to during passaging. For ciprofloxacin, 128 × MIC was the highest concentration tested. The figures are representative of three independent experiments.