The rapid adoption of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled a low-cost detection of cancer associated mutations. While mutation-based tumor profiling is rapidly transforming the clinical management, only a minority of patients currently benefit by druggable mutations in a personalized treatment approach. It becomes clear that a multilevel molecular analysis that also incorporates transcriptome data will provide a deeper tumor profiling and will expand the proportion of patients who can have a benefit.Microarray and RNA-seq gene expression data has been extensively used for the molecular classification of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), providing insight into the molecular heterogeneity of this tumor. In the last few years, specific gene expression signatures associated with human papilloma virus status (HPV+/HPV-), histological origin (basal/luminal) and epithelial-mesenchymal transition [1] have been generated for a better characterization of HNSCC.Besides the great importance of gene expression analysis for the characterization of head and neck heterogeneity, transcriptome profiling has also a high prognostic or predictive value for patients and can be used to assist in treatment decisions for HNSCC. Head and neck cancer is characterized by heterogeneous clinical behavior and response to therapies. Despite the aggressive treatment with surgery, chemotherapy and radiation, 40–50% of patients with advanced disease, recur [2]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to define optimal treatment approaches according to patient stratification. In this direction, gene expression signatures associated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy resistance, metastasis, recurrence, immunotherapy response, cetuximab response and tumor aggressiveness have been developed. Moreover, expression signatures corresponding to specific activated oncogenic pathways that can be targeted therapeutically, such as EGFR and RAS pathways, have also been identified.Despite the great contribution of such studies for understanding the role of pathways represented by these signatures, poor progress has been made in their translation for use in the clinics. The lack of robust validation in independent clinical trials and in multicenter settings is probably an important reason for that. Criticism on these studies also include the lack of appropriate sample size as well as the lack of overlapping genes among the different prognostic signatures.In this article of EBioMedicine, Liu and colleagues report a 60 gene mRNA expression signature for predicting the risk of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) progression [3]. This signature was developed by RNA-seq profiling of 408 OPSCCs from different institutes and its prognostic power was validated by multiple independent cohorts including TCGA OPSCC data. The set of 60 genes was significantly predictive of 5-year overall, 5-year recurrence-free, and 5-year metastasis-free survival and remained also prognostic among the HPV-positive patients of the cohort.The large sample size used, the high number of the selected genes for the signature and the fact that their statistical properties were conserved across different datasets indicate the robustness of the presented signature.The development of this signature is very important as the incidence of OPSCC and particularly the p16+ HPV-related OPSCC has increased markedly (by 40–60%) in North America and Northwestern Europe during the last few decades [4]. The oropharynx is the predominant primary site for HPV-associated head and neck cancer and it is estimated that in North America approximately 60% of OPSCC is HPV positive while in Europe, the high-risk HPV prevalence in OPSCC is approximately 40% [5].HPV+ OPSCC comprises a distinct disease entity that displays significantly better locoregional control and prognosis compared to HPV- OPSCC [6] and for this reason, de-intensification of cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy which is the standard of care for locally advanced tumors, is evaluated in ongoing clinical trials aiming to reduce overtreatment. However, more recently, it became accepted that HPV+ OPSCC is not clinically uniform and that a subset of HPV+ tumors displays high potential for distant recurrence and therefore has poor oncologic outcome [7]. Interestingly, distant metastasis in patients with aggressive HPV+ OPSCC occurs significantly later (more than two years) after completion of chemoradiotherapy than in patients with HPV− disease and is the leading cause of death for HPV–initiated OPSCC [8].Therefore, the signature by Liu and colleagues provides a valuable tool for robust prognostic stratification of HPV+OPSCCs that may help to determine which patients might be at higher risk for distant recurrence. This is crucial for developing individualized treatment plans. For instance, high-risk patients could be excluded from de-escalation treatment protocols and follow a more intensive follow-up for a longer period than what is usually practiced in HNSCC. On the other hand, this gene signature could contribute to ongoing trials by the selection of low-risk HPV+ OPSCC patients for deintensification treatment.Glucose transport and inflammatory response were identified by Liu and colleagues as the most enriched biological pathways represented by their gene expression signature. Numerous studies have demonstrated the critical role of these pathways in modulating cancer development and progression. Accelerated glycolysis is one of the metabolic characteristics of cancer cells. Recent work indicates that advanced glucose transport and metabolism in cancer cells are associated with chemoresistance and survival of tumor cells under hypoxia, leading to poor prognosis [9]. Furthermore, in head and neck cancer, inflammatory mediators have been demonstrated as strong prognostic factors as they affect both the tumor infiltration by immune cells and the cancer transcriptome [10].It is certain that for the majority of the genes reported on the signature, more work is needed in order to establish their functional role on survival, since are not well-known biomarkers. In any case, the next several years are expected to bring an increased focus on incorporating transcriptome, proteomic and immunological data in tumor profiling analysis, revolutionizing the field of precision medicine.
Author's contribution
TR designed the outline of this manuscript and the major points to be presented; TR drafted, edited and finalised the manuscript.
Authors: K Kian Ang; Jonathan Harris; Richard Wheeler; Randal Weber; David I Rosenthal; Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tân; William H Westra; Christine H Chung; Richard C Jordan; Charles Lu; Harold Kim; Rita Axelrod; C Craig Silverman; Kevin P Redmond; Maura L Gillison Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Samuel J Trosman; Shlomo A Koyfman; Matthew C Ward; Samer Al-Khudari; Tobenna Nwizu; John F Greskovich; Eric D Lamarre; Joseph Scharpf; Mumtaz J Khan; Robert R Lorenz; David J Adelstein; Brian B Burkey Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Brian O'Sullivan; Shao Hui Huang; Lillian L Siu; John Waldron; Helen Zhao; Bayardo Perez-Ordonez; Ilan Weinreb; John Kim; Jolie Ringash; Andrew Bayley; Laura A Dawson; Andrew Hope; John Cho; Jonathan Irish; Ralph Gilbert; Patrick Gullane; Angela Hui; Fei-Fei Liu; Eric Chen; Wei Xu Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-01-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Xinyi Liu; Ping Liu; Rebecca D Chernock; Krystle A Lang Kuhs; James S Lewis; Jingqin Luo; Hiram A Gay; Wade L Thorstad; Xiaowei Wang Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 8.143