Literature DB >> 33096409

Diagnostic performance for erosion detection in sacroiliac joints on MR T1-weighted images: Comparison between different slice thicknesses.

Min Chen1, Nele Herregods2, Jacob L Jaremko3, Philippe Carron4, Dirk Elewaut5, Filip Van den Bosch6, Lennart Jans7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of slice thickness on the diagnostic accuracy of erosion detection at MR T1-weighted images (T1WI) of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) in adult patients suspected of sacroiliitis.
METHOD: Patients aged 18-60 years with clinical suspicion of sacroiliitis were enrolled. All patients underwent CT and 3 T MRI of the SIJs on the same day. CT at 1 mm slice thickness, semi-coronal spin echo T1WI sequences with four different slice thicknesses (2, 3, 4 and 5 mm) were obtained. For scoring erosions, each SIJ was divided into four quadrants. Presence or absence of erosions was scored on T1WI sequences by two independent readers blinded to other data. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using κ statistics. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for erosions at each slice thickness was evaluated vs. consensus CT as reference standard, using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (23 men, 30 women, mean age, 39.0 years ± 10.2) were included. Inter-reader agreement for erosion score on all T1WI sequences was moderate (κ value 0.54 to 0.60). With increasing slice thickness, both the recorded total number of erosions and sensitivity for erosion vs. CT decreased. The AUC were significantly higher for 2 mm and 3 mm T1WI than for 4 mm and 5 mm T1WI.
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of T1WI for erosion detection vs. a CT reference standard is affected by slice thickness. Thinner slices (2 or 3 mm) had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than thicker slices (4 or 5 mm).
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erosion; Magnetic resonance imaging; Slice thickness; Spondyloarthritis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33096409     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  2 in total

Review 1.  Imaging in Axial Spondyloarthritis: What is Relevant for Diagnosis in Daily Practice?

Authors:  Ulrich Weber; Anne Grethe Jurik; Robert G W Lambert; Walter P Maksymowych
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Prediction of Treatment Response According to ASAS-EULAR Management Recommendations in 1 Year for Hip Involvement in Axial Spondyloarthritis Based on MRI and Clinical Indicators.

Authors:  Zhuoyao Xie; Zixiao Lu; Hao Chen; Qiang Ye; Chang Guo; Kai Zheng; Xin Li; Qiuxia Xie; Shaoyong Hu; Quan Zhou; Yinghua Zhao
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 6.055

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.