Richard J Shaw1, Breda Cullen2, Nicholas Graham2, Donald M Lyall2, Daniel Mackay2, Chukwudi Okolie3, Robert Pearsall4, Joey Ward2, Ann John3, Daniel J Smith2. 1. Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Richard.Shaw@glasgow.ac.uk. 2. Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom. 3. Institute of Life Sciences, Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom. 4. Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Psychiatry, Monklands Hospital, Airdrie, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The association between loneliness and suicide is poorly understood. We investigated how living alone, loneliness and emotional support were related to suicide and self-harm in a longitudinal design. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2010 UK Biobank recruited and assessed in detail over 0.5 million people in middle age. Data were linked to prospective hospital admission and mortality records. Adjusted Cox regression models were used to investigate relationships between living arrangements, loneliness and emotional support, and both suicide and self-harm as outcomes. RESULTS: For men, both living alone (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.16, 95%CI 1.51-3.09) and living with non-partners (HR 1.80, 95%CI 1.08-3.00) were associated with death by suicide, independently of loneliness, which had a modest relationship with suicide (HR 1.43, 95%CI 0.1.01-2.03). For women, there was no evidence that living arrangements, loneliness or emotional support were associated with death by suicide. Associations between living alone and self-harm were explained by health for women, and by health, loneliness and emotional support for men. In fully adjusted models, loneliness was associated with hospital admissions for self-harm in both women (HR 1.89, 95%CI 1.57-2.28) and men (HR 1.74, 95%CI 1.40-2.16). LIMITATIONS: Loneliness and emotional support were operationalized using single item measures. CONCLUSIONS: For men - but not for women - living alone or living with a non-partner increased the risk of suicide, a finding not explained by subjective loneliness. Overall, loneliness may be more important as a risk factor for self-harm than for suicide. Loneliness also appears to lessen the protective associations of cohabitation.
BACKGROUND: The association between loneliness and suicide is poorly understood. We investigated how living alone, loneliness and emotional support were related to suicide and self-harm in a longitudinal design. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2010 UK Biobank recruited and assessed in detail over 0.5 million people in middle age. Data were linked to prospective hospital admission and mortality records. Adjusted Cox regression models were used to investigate relationships between living arrangements, loneliness and emotional support, and both suicide and self-harm as outcomes. RESULTS: For men, both living alone (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.16, 95%CI 1.51-3.09) and living with non-partners (HR 1.80, 95%CI 1.08-3.00) were associated with death by suicide, independently of loneliness, which had a modest relationship with suicide (HR 1.43, 95%CI 0.1.01-2.03). For women, there was no evidence that living arrangements, loneliness or emotional support were associated with death by suicide. Associations between living alone and self-harm were explained by health for women, and by health, loneliness and emotional support for men. In fully adjusted models, loneliness was associated with hospital admissions for self-harm in both women (HR 1.89, 95%CI 1.57-2.28) and men (HR 1.74, 95%CI 1.40-2.16). LIMITATIONS: Loneliness and emotional support were operationalized using single item measures. CONCLUSIONS: For men - but not for women - living alone or living with a non-partner increased the risk of suicide, a finding not explained by subjective loneliness. Overall, loneliness may be more important as a risk factor for self-harm than for suicide. Loneliness also appears to lessen the protective associations of cohabitation.
Authors: Kaisla Joutsenniemi; Tuija Martelin; Pekka Martikainen; Sami Pirkola; Seppo Koskinen Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Antonella Granieri; Silvia Casale; Maria Domenica Sauta; Isabella Giulia Franzoi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-19 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Yung-Chia Hsueh; Rachel Batchelor; Margaux Liebmann; Ashley Dhanani; Laura Vaughan; Anne-Kathrin Fett; Farhana Mann; Alexandra Pitman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-14 Impact factor: 4.614