BACKGROUND: Chest radiography is routinely performed after endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) to detect clinically occult pneumothorax. Because the established rate of postprocedure pneumothorax is low, this study sought to determine whether routine chest radiography can be safely eliminated and to ascertain the potential cost reduction with its omission. METHODS: Patients who underwent EBUS-FNA between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) were retrospectively identified. Patient-related factors were summarized using descriptive statistics. Outcomes were compared using the χ2, Fisher exact, and analysis of variance tests. Univariate regression analysis was used to identify factors predictive of postprocedure pneumothorax. RESULTS: A total of 757 patients were included in the study: 72.4% (548 of 757) underwent routine chest radiography in the postanesthesia care unit. Clinically relevant or radiographically evident pneumothorax developed in 1.5% of patients (11 of 757). Of the patients who underwent chest radiography, 0.5% (3 of 548) required unplanned admission for postprocedure pneumothorax, and 0.2% (1 of 548) required tube thoracostomy. Of the 209 patients who did not undergo chest radiography, none experienced a clinically evident pneumothorax. In total, only 1 patient (0.1%) had symptomatic pneumothorax. The pneumothorax event rate was so low that no association with demographic or clinical factors and no predictive factors could be identified. The number of patients needed to be screened by chest radiography to identify 1 patient requiring deviation from routine management is 183. The potential total cost reduction if routine chest radiography had been eliminated was $33,950. CONCLUSIONS: The extremely low rate of postprocedure pneumothorax precluded informative statistical analysis. Routine chest radiography after EBUS-FNA may not be necessary, and its omission may confer a cost savings.
BACKGROUND: Chest radiography is routinely performed after endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) to detect clinically occult pneumothorax. Because the established rate of postprocedure pneumothorax is low, this study sought to determine whether routine chest radiography can be safely eliminated and to ascertain the potential cost reduction with its omission. METHODS: Patients who underwent EBUS-FNA between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) were retrospectively identified. Patient-related factors were summarized using descriptive statistics. Outcomes were compared using the χ2, Fisher exact, and analysis of variance tests. Univariate regression analysis was used to identify factors predictive of postprocedure pneumothorax. RESULTS: A total of 757 patients were included in the study: 72.4% (548 of 757) underwent routine chest radiography in the postanesthesia care unit. Clinically relevant or radiographically evident pneumothorax developed in 1.5% of patients (11 of 757). Of the patients who underwent chest radiography, 0.5% (3 of 548) required unplanned admission for postprocedure pneumothorax, and 0.2% (1 of 548) required tube thoracostomy. Of the 209 patients who did not undergo chest radiography, none experienced a clinically evident pneumothorax. In total, only 1 patient (0.1%) had symptomatic pneumothorax. The pneumothorax event rate was so low that no association with demographic or clinical factors and no predictive factors could be identified. The number of patients needed to be screened by chest radiography to identify 1 patient requiring deviation from routine management is 183. The potential total cost reduction if routine chest radiography had been eliminated was $33,950. CONCLUSIONS: The extremely low rate of postprocedure pneumothorax precluded informative statistical analysis. Routine chest radiography after EBUS-FNA may not be necessary, and its omission may confer a cost savings.
Authors: Daniel P Steinfort; Danny Liew; Matthew Conron; Anastasia F Hutchinson; Louis B Irving Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Francys C Verdial; Kathleen S Berfield; Douglas E Wood; Michael S Mulligan; Joshua A Roth; David O Francis; Farhood Farjah Journal: Chest Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Andrew Pierre; Gail Darling; Marc de Perrot; Thomas Waddell; Michael Johnston; Gilda da Cunha Santos; William Geddie; Scott Boerner; Lisa W Le; Shaf Keshavjee Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2011-10-02 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: George A Eapen; Archan M Shah; Xiudong Lei; Carlos A Jimenez; Rodolfo C Morice; Lonny Yarmus; Joshua Filner; Cynthia Ray; Gaetane Michaud; Sara R Greenhill; Mona Sarkiss; Roberto Casal; David Rice; David E Ost Journal: Chest Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: L D Sharples; C Jackson; E Wheaton; G Griffith; J T Annema; C Dooms; K G Tournoy; E Deschepper; V Hughes; L Magee; M Buxton; R C Rintoul Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2012 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Luke V Selby; Renee L Gennarelli; Geoffrey C Schnorr; Stephen B Solomon; Mark A Schattner; Elena B Elkin; Peter B Bach; Vivian E Strong Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 14.766