| Literature DB >> 33095839 |
Lajos Balint1,2, Katalin Fuzer2, Xenia Gonda3,4,5, Peter Dome3,4.
Abstract
From the end of the 1980s, the Hungarian suicide rate, which had been until that point the highest in the world for decades, has decreased drastically. The reason behind this decrease was probably due to the changes in numerous and often interlinked risk factors. Studies on this topic have mostly ignored to interrogate to what extent the change of the population composition, for example the improvement of educational level, contributed to the decrease of the rate in the given period? Our aim was to assess the contribution of changes in some sociodemographic factors to the decrease of the suicide rate in Hungary. During the analysis, data from 1990 were compared with data from 2011. For the statistical calculations, the method of "Standardization and Decomposition (SDA)" was used, which according to our best knowledge, has not yet been applied in Hungarian suicide studies. The results show that the improvement of educational level helped to decrease the rate for men by about a third, while for women only by about a tenth. However, the benefit of the improvement in educational attainment during the period investigated was significantly offset by the changes primarily in marital status (the ratios of unmarried and divorced subjects increased for both genders) and in age distribution (the ratio of the elderly persons increased for both genders). The results of our study emphasise the inverse relationship between suicide and educational level and support the hypothesis that we can regard educational policy as indirect health policy.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33095839 PMCID: PMC7584192 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241314
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Hungarian raw suicide rate (/100,000 capita) between 1970 and 2014 for the whole population and population of 25 years of age and above, by genders.
Number of subjects aged 25 years and above by educational attainment, age, marital status and gender in 1990 and 2011.
| Demographic groups | Males (n, %) | Females (n, %) | Total (n, %) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 2011 | 1990 | 2011 | 1990 | 2011 | |
| 25–29 | 31367 (9,9) | 310238 (9,2) | 306619 (8,4) | 301063 (7,7) | 620290 (9,1) | 611301 (8,4) |
| 30–34 | 389033 (12,3) | 385903 (11,5) | 385382 (10,6) | 379414 (9,7) | 774415 (11,4) | 765317 (10,5) |
| 35–39 | 423099 (13,4) | 412285 (12,3) | 424242 (11,6) | 403311 (10,3) | 847341 (12,5) | 815596 (11,2) |
| 40–44 | 355443 (11,3) | 358261 (10,7) | 361232 (9,9) | 356260 (9,1) | 716675 (10,5) | 714521 (9,8) |
| 45–49 | 328144 (10,4) | 297246 (8,9) | 346810 (9,5) | 304426 (7,8) | 674954 (9,9) | 601672 (8,3) |
| 50–54 | 277582 (8,8) | 315132 (9,4) | 320119 (8,8) | 342439 (8,7) | 597701 (8,8) | 657571 (9,0) |
| 55–59 | 279920 (8,9) | 364059 (10,9) | 327623 (9,0) | 417052 (10,6) | 607543 (8,9) | 781111 (10,7) |
| 60–64 | 259856 (8,2) | 293440 (8,7) | 326068 (8,9) | 360551 (9,2) | 585924 (8,6) | 653991 (9,7) |
| 65–69 | 221183 (7,0) | 221918 (6,6) | 308485 (8,5) | 301053 (7,7) | 529668 (7,8) | 522971 (7,2) |
| 70–74 | 106513 (3,4) | 162896 (4,9) | 161269 (4,4) | 260948 (6,6) | 267782 (3,9) | 423844 (5,8) |
| 75–79 | 117075 (3,7) | 115657 (3,4) | 199509 (5,5) | 215416 (5,5) | 316584 (4,7) | 331073 (4,5) |
| 80–84 | 57685 (1,8) | 73546 (2,2) | 114744 (3,1) | 160669 (4,1) | 172429 (2,5) | 234215 (3,2) |
| 85-x | 25008 (0,8) | 43539 (1,3) | 62451 (1,7) | 121478 (3,1) | 87459 (1,3) | 165017 (2,3) |
| Less than 8 years | 631997 (20,0) | 103184 (3.1) | 1105989 (30.3) | 280883 (7.2) | 1737986 (25.6) | 384067 (5.3) |
| Vocational school/primary school (8–11 yr) | 1631500 (51.7) | 1752514 (52.4) | 1522191 (41.8) | 1660274 (42.3) | 3153691 (46.4) | 3412788 (47.0) |
| Graduated from secondary-school (12–14 yr) | 520014 (16.5) | 879344 (26.3) | 699454 (19.2) | 1209603 (30.8) | 1219468 (17.9) | 2088947 (28.7) |
| Graduated from university/college (15≤ yr) | 370701 (11.8) | 609078 (18.2) | 316919 (8.7) | 773320 (19.7) | 687620 (10.1) | 1382398 (19.0) |
| Married | 2423391 (76,8) | 1871332 (55,8) | 2321788 (63,7) | 1874485 (47,8) | 4745179 (69,8) | 3745817 (51,5) |
| Unmarried | 334263 (10,6) | 929590 (27,7) | 201551 (5,5) | 649676 (16,6) | 535814 (7,9) | 1579266 (21,7) |
| Divorced | 245993 (7,8) | 401135 (12,0) | 348630 (9,6) | 577624 (14,7) | 594623 (8,7) | 978759 (13,4) |
| Widowed | 150565 (4,8) | 152063 (4,5) | 772584 (21,2) | 822295 (21,0) | 923149 (13,6) | 974358 (13,4) |
| 3154212 (100,0) | 3354120 (100,0) | 3644553 (100,0) | 3924080 (100,0) | 6798765 (100,0) | 7278200 (100,0) | |
Source: HCSO Census data 1990, 2011, own calculation
Raw suicide rates by educational attainment, marital status and gender in the population aged 25 and above, in 1990 and 2011 (per 100,000 capita).
| Groups | Males | Females | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 2011 | 1990 | 2011 | 1990 | 2011 | |
| Less than 8 years | 134,97 | 100,79 | 41,53 | 23,38 | 75,51 | 44,18 |
| Vocational school/primary school | 99,71 | 70,54 | 29,34 | 17,59 | 65,76 | 44,86 |
| Graduated from secondary-school | 45.70 | 33.59 | 23.16 | 10.33 | 32.77 | 20.12 |
| Graduated from university/college | 28.41 | 22.55 | 17.25 | 7.16 | 23.27 | 13.94 |
| Married | 67,70 | 39,85 | 19,58 | 8,91 | 44,16 | 24,36 |
| Unmarried | 114,98 | 43,93 | 30,76 | 9,08 | 83,30 | 29,59 |
| Divorced | 178,87 | 104,29 | 49,53 | 22,91 | 103,03 | 56,26 |
| Widowed | 238,44 | 136,79 | 56,09 | 21,85 | 85,83 | 39,79 |
| 89,51 | 53,07 | 30,80 | 13,71 | 58,04 | 31,85 | |
Fig 2Suicide rate by age groups and genders in 1990 and 2011, for the population of 25 years of age and above.
Fig 3Suicide rate by educational attainment in 1990 and 2011 (males 25 years of age and above).
Fig 4Suicide rate by educational attainment in 1990 and 2011 (females 25 years of age and above).
Fig 5Suicide rate by marital status in 1990 and 2011 (males 25 years of age and above).
Fig 6Suicide rate by marital status in 1990 and 2011 (females 25 years of age and above).
The results of SDA by including the factors educational attainment and age.
| Component effect | Standardization | Decomposition | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population 2011 | Population 1990 | Difference (Effect) | Percent Distribution of Effect | |
| Age | 71,00 | 67,90 | 3,11 | -8,53 |
| Education | 63,54 | 75,36 | -11,82 | 32,44 |
| Adjusted rate effect / mean | 56,21 | 83,94 | -27,73 | 76,09 |
| Crude rate / mean | 53,07 | 89,51 | -36,44 | 100,00 |
| Age | 24,84 | 21,48 | 3,37 | -19,69 |
| Education | 22,05 | 24,28 | -2,23 | 13,04 |
| Adjusted rate effect / mean | 14,62 | 32,85 | -18,23 | 106,64 |
| Crude rate / mean | 13,71 | 30,80 | -17,09 | 100,00 |
| Age | 45,94 | 42,98 | 2,96 | -11,29 |
| Education | 41,30 | 47,45 | -6,15 | 23,48 |
| Gender | 44,41 | 44,78 | -0,37 | 1,41 |
| Adjusted rate effect / mean | 33,85 | 56,48 | -22,63 | 86,40 |
| Crude rate / mean | 31,85 | 58,04 | -26,19 | 100,00 |
The results of SDA by including the factors educational attainment, age and marital status.
| Component effect | Standardization | Decomposition | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population 2011 | Population 1990 | Difference (Effect) | Percent Distribution of Effect | |
| Age | 73,51 | 69,47 | 4,04 | -11,09 |
| Education | 65,74 | 77,28 | -11,55 | 31,69 |
| Marital status | 76,10 | 67,09 | 9,01 | -24,72 |
| Adjusted rate effect / mean | 53,65 | 91,59 | -37,94 | 104,12 |
| Crude rate / mean | 53,07 | 89,51 | -36,44 | 100,00 |
| Age | 24,85 | 22,02 | 2,83 | -16,53 |
| Education | 22,58 | 24,31 | -1,73 | 10,13 |
| Marital status | 24,70 | 22,39 | 2,30 | -13,47 |
| Adjusted rate effect / mean | 13,94 | 34,42 | -20,49 | 119,87 |
| Crude rate / mean | 13,71 | 30,80 | -17,09 | 100,00 |
| Age | 47,22 | 43,94 | 3,28 | -12,51 |
| Education | 42,57 | 48,44 | -5,87 | 22,41 |
| Marital status | 48,52 | 42,85 | 5,67 | -21,66 |
| Gender | 45,40 | 46,12 | -0,71 | 2,71 |
| Adjusted rate effect / mean | 32,30 | 60,86 | -28,56 | 109,05 |
| Crude rate / mean | 31,85 | 58,04 | -26,19 | 100,00 |