Post-traumatic stress, social, and physical health: A mediation and moderation analysis of Syrian refugees and Jordanians in a border community.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the mediating or moderating relationship of social health on physical health and post-traumatic stress symptoms among displaced Syrians and Jordanians at high risk for physical and mental health ailments. Frequency of mental health symptoms stratified by demographic factors was also explored. We hypothesized social health would mediate and/or moderate the relationship between physical and post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS).
METHODS: This cross-sectional study includes 598 adults between 18 and 75 years old recruited from three health centers in the city of Irbid, Jordan, 20 km away from the Syrian border. Post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) were measured through the primary care post-traumatic stress disorder checklist. Physical and social health were assessed through the Duke Health Profile. One-way ANOVA and independent samples T-tests examined mean scores of social health, PTSS, physical health stratified by age, gender, nationality, education level, and trauma exposure. Bivariate correlations explored the relationship between social health, PTSS, and physical health. PROCESS macro tested social health as a moderator and mediator on the association of the physical health and PTSS.
RESULTS: Social health moderated and mediated the relationship between physical health and PTSS. Males reported (t = 2.53, p < .05) better physical health scores than females. Those who had less than a high school education reported lower social health (F = 13.83, p < .001); higher PTSS (F = 5.83, p < .001); and lower physical health (F = 5.76, p < .01) than more educated individuals. Syrians reported significantly higher PTSS (F = 4.13, p < .05) than Jordanians, however, there was no significant differences between nationality for physical or social health. Social health was positively associated with better physical health (r = 0.10, p < .01) and negatively with PTSS (r = -.293, p < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results support our primary hypothesis suggesting social health mediates and moderates PTSS and physical health. Secondary findings illustrate gender, educational, and income differences in physical health and PTSS. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: NCT03721848.

Introduction

The connection between social, physical, and psychological well-being is well documented. Social support, which is drawn from social networks (e.g., family or friends) has been shown to act as a protective mechanism against psychological distress and to buffer physical health ailments [1-3]. Research has illustrated that social connections may reduce the severity of mental health conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression and may buffer other psychological distress symptoms [4-6]. Direct links have also been established between physical health ailments and mental health symptomology. For example, PTSD has been associated with a myriad of physical health-related co-morbidities such as chronic pain, poor physical health-related quality of life, and general health complaints [5, 7].

Individuals who live in poverty or have experienced chronic stress and/or traumatic events are at a high risk for physical and mental health ailments [8-11]. Disaster exposed individuals, for example, are at a disproportionate risk of developing co-morbid post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and vascular problems [12]. While studies have illustrated the linear connection between social, physical, and mental health symptoms, few have examined how social health (e.g. support from social networks and quality of relationships) [13, 14] may play an intermediary role between physical and mental health. To address this, our study examines the influence of social health on the relationship between physical health and post-traumatic stress symptoms in a border community in Jordan with a high population of displaced Syrians, and where the host community experiences high rates of poverty and has been affected by the Syrian refugee crisis over the past several years.

Background

Syrian crisis in Jordan

The Syrian crisis has been declared the worst refugee crisis since World War II, displacing over 6 million Syrians to neighboring countries and Europe [15]. According to a 2016 United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights report, over 5.6 million registered Syrian refugees had fled from their homes and are living in surrounding countries such as Turkey, Lebanon, and Jordan; the number of refugees has grown additional 12.7% from the previous year [16].

Jordan is among the countries with the largest influx of displaced Syrians. As of August, 2020 there were, 658,756 Syrians refugees registered through the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), and the Jordanian government estimates approximately 1.4 Syrians remain unregistered in the country [8, 17, 18]. While many of the Syrians in Jordan have experienced the complex trauma of the war, Jordanians have been adversely impacted by the influx of hundreds of thousands of refugees [10, 19]. The inundation of refugees has put a strain on healthcare and social services, and has increased job competition, thereby increasing the potential for civil conflict and societal discord [10, 19, 20]. Given the fragility of Jordan’s overloaded system, many low-income Jordanians and displaced Syrians are without healthcare, jobs, and social services [19]. Moreover, systems in Jordan have been unable to provide adequate healthcare to individuals with chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) (e.g., hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease) or mental health conditions (e.g., depression, post-traumatic stress, anxiety) [19, 21, 22].

Jordan has also experienced an epidemiological shift from the decreasing incidence of infectious diseases and fertility-related mortality to a rapidly increasing prevalence of chronic NCDs, such as diabetes, obesity, asthma, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer [20, 23]. This transition is due in part to medical advances, which have resulted in reduced mortality and increased ability to prevent fertility-related mortality [24]. These advances have led to rapid population growth, which coupled with globalization, modernization, the refugee crisis, and urbanization, has initiated population level sociocultural changes [23].

In recent years, the global burden of NCDs has gained attention, particularly in low and middle-income countries. It is estimated that 80% of deaths globally are connected to NCDs, which are of particular concern to individuals from middle income countries, such as Syria and Jordan [25]. In Jordan, ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death (18%), followed by cancer (15%), strokes (12%), and diabetes (7%) [26]. A study of NCDs among Syrians in Jordan found that participants reported at least one family member with an NCD, including hypertension (9.7%), arthritis (6.8%), diabetes (5.3%), chronic respiratory diseases (3.1%), and cardiovascular disease (3.7%) [21].

The global burden of mental health-related disorders has also emerged on the international stage, particularly in LMICs. Common mental health disorders such as anxiety and depression significantly contribute to the overall burden of disease in many LMICs [9]. The National Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey in Jordan found that 18.4 percent of low-income Jordanians reported frequent mental health distress [27]. Studies have suggested that, among displaced Syrians, clinical levels of post-traumatic stress are as high as 71% [28, 29]. Mental health difficulties in LMICs have been attributed to a myriad of factors, such as food and housing instability, forced displacement, exposure to potentially traumatic events, and the depletion of resources [9, 30].

Chronic diseases and mental health disorders often co-occur. The prevalence of depression in the global population ranges from 3–10%, while up to 33% of individuals with chronic diseases experience co-morbid depression [31, 32]. Al-Amer and colleagues [5] found 19.7 percent of Jordanians diagnosed with diabetes reported co-occurring depression. Studies of Syrian refugees in Jordan have also found that over half of those with chronic diseases also reported high levels of PTSD, and 35% of Syrians previously diagnosed with a chronic illness experienced clinical rates of depression [12, 33]. The co-morbidity of mental disorders and physical illness accounts for a 37% loss of healthy life years; smoking, alcohol consumption, lack of physical activity, unhealthy diet, and decreased access to healthcare have all been linked to this loss [34]. Co-morbid depression and diabetes, for example, has a slew of negative effects, such as decreases in self-care and self-management, a reduction in adherence to medication, and increases in medical expenditures [35-37].

The primary causes of mortality among individuals with mental health difficulties include preventable conditions such as cardiac illnesses, respiratory and infectious diseases, diabetes, and hypertension [38]. Furthermore, displaced populations often are unable to adequately treat chronic physical and mental health conditions due to a lack of medications and appropriate health care [1, 33]. Al-Rousan and colleagues [6] found that cost of living, lack of legal work opportunities, and inability to access healthcare were associated with psychological distress and health problems among displaced Syrians in Jordan. Given these startling rates of NCDs and mental health-related issues, scholars have called for continued research to explore those relationships between those social, biological, personal, and economic factors which impact physical and mental health in LMICs [9].

Social, physical, and mental health

Social health, which is defined as the combination of social networks and social support [39], involves the intersection of a feeling of belonging or acceptance and fulfillment in social roles, which in-turn can boost health and emotional well-being [14, 40, 41]. A growing body of evidence from the past several decades has illustrated causal relationships between role identity (e.g. social ties, self-esteem, social health), longevity, physical, and mental health [3, 42, 43]. A meta-analysis of 148 studies found a significant association between social health and reduced risk for overall mortality due to chronic diseases [44].

Scholars have suggested that social support and networks are comprised of two processes which can influence health and mental health outcomes. The first process involves the provision of informational, emotional, or instrumental resources to an individual to meet his or her physical and emotional needs. The second process, which we will examine in this paper, are the health benefits associated with participation and inclusion in a social group. Social interactions influence emotional, biological, or behavioral responses in an individual. In turn, these social interactions influence a person’s sense of personal control, self-concept, and self-worth [3, 40]. Social health may thereby reduce stress during adversity, which can protect individuals from physical health-related difficulties. Likewise, the social factors attributed to physical health outcomes are markedly similar to those that are associated with positive mental health outcomes and therefore should mediate the relationship between physical and mental health [3].

Research has examined the relationship between social, physical, and mental health, however, few scholars have examined the pathways which may influence these correlations [3]. The following study, therefore, sought to explore mediating and moderating role of social health on physical health and post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) within a Jordanian community near the Syrian border. Our primary aim was to examine the mediating and moderating role of social health on the relationship between physical health and PTSS.

Methods

This cross-sectional study includes the first wave of data in a longitudinal intervention study measuring the impact of a health and mental health awareness program in Jordan. The data included in this study was collected in April 2017 with three health clinics and 598 participants in the city of Irbid, Jordan, 20 km away from the Syrian border. Eligible patients were referred to the study through the treating Ministry of Health physicians at local health centers. Fliers in Arabic were posted with information about the study at the health centers. Individuals were eligible for the study if they were: (1) between 18 and 75 years old; (2) utilized services at the health centers between January and April 2017.

The principal investigator trained the research team in data collection, consenting procedures, confidentiality of data, research ethics, and study methodology. The research team included three Jordanian staff employed by the Royal Health Awareness Society (RHAS) and two Ministry of Health nurses all fluent in Arabic; two United States based Americares staff; and one university researcher. All questionnaires were translated from English into Arabic by the RHAS research team members, and back translated followed by pilot testing to ensure quality and accuracy of survey measures. The RHAS research team members collected the first wave of data over three weeks via paper surveys.

Individuals who met the inclusion criteria were invited to participate in the study. If the participant was unable to read or write, the consent form was read to them by the research staff collecting the data. Written consent was obtained prior to participation in any study activities. The questionnaire was administered through researcher assisted self-completion to ensure comprehension of the survey items. The Ministry of Health nurses and RHAS staff read the questions in Arabic, repeating and clarifying if the study participants expressed any difficulties with comprehension. Study procedures were approved by the Jordanian Ministry of Health and the first author’s institutional review board prior to data collection.

Measures

Demographics

Demographic items included gender, marital status, income, nationality, age, and education.

Short form of the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C)

This six-item screener, which was developed for use in primary care, is derived from the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version to screen for persons with possible PTSS [45]. The items evaluate re-experiencing, avoidance, and hyper-arousal. The full checklist has been validated to screen for PTSD in countries such as China, Armenia, Nepal, and with Arab and Kurdish populations [26, 27, 46, 47]. Questions inquired how often in the past month a person has been bothered by a symptom of PTSD. For example, one question inquired “How often in the past month were you bothered by repeated, disturbing memories, thoughts, or images of a stressful experience.” Items were scored on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely). Scores range from 1–30 with 14 being the cutoff for a probable clinical diagnosis of PTSD [45, 48]. Reliability for this sample was adequate, Cronbach’s alpha .728.

Duke Health Profile

The Duke Health Profile is a 17-item standardized self-report instrument containing six health measures (physical, mental, social, general, perceived health, and self-esteem), and four dysfunction measures (anxiety, depression, pain, and disability). It is a brief tool derived from the Duke UNC Health profile used to measure overall health as an outcome of preventative health and medical interventions. The tool has strong face and convergent validity. Specifically, the discriminant validity separates those with physical health problems and those with mental health problems [49]. This study examined two of the health measures, physical health and social health. The physical health subscale consisted of five items on a three-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (None) to 2 (A lot). Sample questions inquired how often in the past week participants had experienced trouble: (1) walking up a flight of stairs; (2) hurting or aching in any part of the body; (3) getting tired easily. Social health consisted of five questions inquiring about quality of social relationships and how often the participant took part in social activities. Sample questions included how often in the past week the participant: (1) socialized with others; (2) attended social, religious, or recreation activities. A sample of a relationship quality item ask the participant how much they agree with the following statement: (1) I am happy with family relationships. These questions were scored on a three-point Likert scale from 0 (Doesn’t describe me at all) to 2 (describes me exactly). To create a composite score for each sub-scale, items are first summed and then multiplied by 10. The range for the social and physical health scales range from 0–100. Reliability in our sample was adequate, with Cronbach’s alpha .72 and .65 respectively.

Brief Trauma Questionnaire (BTQ)

The BTQ is a ten-item self-report questionnaire used to determine if a person has a qualifying life event that meets Diagnostic Statistical Manual-IV Criteria A for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Items inquire about specific types of traumatic events and are scored by participants marking yes or no to the questions. Scores range from 0 (no traumatic events) to 9 (exposure to 9 traumatic events). Examples of the questions include whether the person has: (1) had a life-threatening injury (2) experienced war or disaster; (3) been in a situation where they were seriously injured [50]. Within our study we further categorized exposure into three categories: 0 (no traumatic experiences), 1 (one traumatic experience), 2 (more than one traumatic experience).

Statistical analyses

Data were cleaned and descriptive statistics calculated to assess demographic characteristics. A small percentage (1–3%) of the data were missing for our variables of interest (PTSS, social health, physical health), therefore, we excluded the missing data from the analyses. One-way ANOVA and independent samples t-tests examined mean scores of social health, PTSS, and physical health stratified by trauma exposure, age, gender, nationality, and education level. Bivariate correlations examined the relationship between PTSS, social health, and physical health.

To test the moderation we tested the relationships for: (i) the direct effect of the predictor (physical health) on PTSS, (ii) the direct effect of the moderator (social health) on PTSS, and (iii) the interaction effect of the moderator (social health) on physical heath and PTSS [51]. In order to further characterize the moderating effect that social health had on the relationship between physical health and PTSS we used the Johnson–Neymann (J–N) technique. The J-N technique was used to calculate regions of significance and confidence bands to assess the effect of the independent variable across all levels of the moderator variable [49]. The J-N technique identifies points in the range (0–100) of the moderator variable (social health) where the impact of the independent variable (physical health) on the dependent variable (PTSS) is significant and non-significant [52].

The mediation effects were tested in four steps examining the (i) direct effect of social health (mediator) on PTSS (ii) direct effect of physical health (predictor) on social health (mediator), (iii) total effect of physical health (predictor) on PTSS and (iv) significance of the indirect effect using bias-corrected bootstrapping with 95% confidence intervals (CI) [53]. Mediation is proven when the analysis found significant a- and b-paths, as well as a significant indirect effect with 95% confidence intervals that did not include zero [53]. We adjusted for the effect of sociodemographic correlates (age, gender, nationality, trauma exposure, and education level) in the moderation and mediation models. Income was not included as a control variable because most (91.2%) of the sample came from lower income households. All analyses were conducted in SPSS 27.0.

Results

The study sample was primarily female, 70.1% and Jordanian, 62.1%. Ages ranged from 18–55+ with most participants between 35–54 years old 44.3%. Most of the participants came from relatively low-income households, with 48.8% making less than 200 Jordanian Dinar (approximately 280 U.S. dollars) per month. Only 36.7% of our study sample completed high school or above. Most of the sample (53.4%) experienced at least one traumatic event. The most common trauma experience Syrian participants reported was being in a war zone (73.8%), and among Jordanians was witnessing a violent death (18.6%). See Table 1 for demographic characteristics and Table 2 for percentages of trauma experiences stratified by nationality.

Table 1

Demographic characteristics.

N = 598	Frequency (%)
Gender
Female	419 (70.1)
Male	179 (29.9)
Missing	0 (0.0)
Age
18–34	113 (18.8)
35–54	286 (47.8)
55+	143 (23.9)
Missing	56 (9.3)
Nationality
Jordanian	371 (62.1)
Syrian	223 (37.4)
Egyptian	2 (0.3)
Palestinian	1 (.2)
Missing	1 (.2)
Monthly Income
Less than 200 JD	284 (48.8)
200–500	247 (42.4)
500–1,000	51 (8.7)
Missing	16 (2.6)
Marital status
Married	491 (85.1)
Other	86 (14.9)
Missing	21 (3.5)
Education
Less than High School	367 (63.3)
High school	126 (21.7)
Above High school	87 (15.0)
Missing	18 (3.0)
Number of traumatic experiences
None	237 (46.6)
One	112 (22.0)
More than one	160 (31.4)
Missing	89 (14.8)

Table 2

Trauma experience type by nationality.

Trauma type	Syrian	Jordanian
War zone	153 (73.8%)	35 (9.9%)
Serious car accident	54 (25.8%)	57 (16.2%)
Natural or technological disaster	35 (16.8%)	17 (4.8%)
Life threatening illness	23 (11.1%)	20 (5.6%)
Physical Attack	34 (16.3%)	25 (6.9%)
Violent death of family member	63 (30.1%)	68 (18.6%)
Witnessed death of someone	71 (33.6%)	52 (14.2%)
Other experience	48 (22.9%)	26 (7.2%)

One-way ANOVA and independent sample T-tests examined mean scores of social health, PTSS, physical health stratified by age, gender, nationality, education level, and trauma exposure. Those who were above 55 years old had lower self-reported physical health F(2, 512) = 7.47, p < .01 than younger individuals. Males reported significantly t(591) = 2.53, p < .05 better physical health scores than females. Those who had less than a high school education reported significantly lower social health F(2, 576) = 13.83, p < .001; higher PTSS F(2, 569) = 5.83 p < .001; and lower physical health F(2, 574) = 13.03, p < .001 than more educated individuals. Those with lower income (<200JD per month) scored lower on social health F(2, 578) = 6.86, p < .01; lower physical health F(2, 576) = 5.76, p < .01; and higher PTSS F(2, 571) = 14.48, p < .001. Syrians reported significantly higher PTSS scores than Jordanians F(2, 584) = 4.13, p < .05. There were no significant differences between Syrians and Jordanians on social or physical health. Table 3 presents t-tests and ANOVA results.

Table 3

T-test and one-way ANOVA of demographic differences in social health, Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms (PTSS), and physical health.

	Social health			PTSS			Physical health
	M (SD)	t	Cohen’s d	M (SD)	t	Cohen’s d	M (SD)	t	Cohen’s d
Gender
Male	61.58 (20.25)	2.52*	0.29	14.30 (5.67)	-1.63	-0.09	46.31 (25.89)	2.53*	0.21
Female	57.13 (18.27)			15.18 (6.11)			40.62 (24.61)
Marital status
Married	58.85 (19.06)	-0.06	0.01	14.65 (5.87)	2.59*	0.22	42.39 (24.89)	-0.05	.06
Other	58.72 (17.67)			16.48 (6.47)			40.81 (25.68)
Income		F	η2		F	η2		F	η2
Less than 200 JD	49.18 (18.14)	6.96**	0.03	16.14 (6.28)	14.48***	0.06	39.28 (24.06)	5.76**	0.02
200–500	54.30 (17.31)			13.84 (5.65)			44.26 (25.59)
More than 500 JD	55.88 (16.02)			12.31 (5.28)			50.78 (36.06)
Nationality
Jordanian	59.38 (19.03)	1.23	0.04	14.43 (6.27)	4.13*	0.01	43.76 (25.58)	1.81	0.01
Syrian	56.97 (18.84)			15.87 (6.89)			39.91 (24.33)
Other	53.33 (25.17)			10.33 (2.08)			33.33 (11.55)
Age
18–34	56.64 (17.62)	1.07	0.01	14.32 (5.91)	.66	0.001	49.38 (23.76)	7.47**	0.03
35–54	59.39 (17.99)			14.75 (6.66)			43.08 (24.88)
55+	59.78 (17.26)			15.28 (7.05)			37.10 (26.23)
Education
Less high school	55.47 (18.32)	13.83***	0.05	15.67 (6.30)	5.83**	0.04	38.18 (25.01)	13.03***	0.04
High school	63.33 (20.79)			13.64 (5.59)			47.78 (23.56)
Above high school	64.71 (16.83)			13.94 (8.18)			50.57 (24.94)
Number of traumatic experiences
None	59.49 (18.66)	4.757**	0.02	13.99 (6.27)	15.03***	0.06	44.56 (25.17)	7.09**	0.03
One	61.96 (16.97)			14.06 (4.79)			44.38 (24.67)
More than one	55.25 (19.20)			17.11 (5.87)			41.73 (24.83)

* < .05

** < .01

*** < .001.

Bivariate correlations indicated that social health was significantly positively associated with better physical health (r = 0.10, p < .05) and negatively associated with PTSS (r = -.22, p < .01). Higher PTSS was negatively associated with better physical health (r = -0.35, p < .01) and social health (r = -0.293, p < .01). Table 4 presents correlation’s between post-traumatic stress symptoms, physical health, and social health.

Table 4

Correlations (Pearson’s r) between post-traumatic stress symptoms, physical health, and social health.

Variables	1	2	3
1. Social health	-	0.10*	-0.22***
2. Physical health	-	-	-0.35***
3. PTSS	-	-	-

* < .05, ** < .01

*** < .001.

The moderation and mediational role of social health on the relationship between PTSS and physical health

Moderation analyses illustrated that higher physical health (B = -0.14, SE = 0.05, p<0.001) and social health (B = -0.13, SE = 0.03, p<0.001) were significantly associated with lower PTSS scores. The positive coefficient of the interaction term of physical health and social health indicated that social health was a significant moderator on the relationship between self-reported physical health and PTSS (B = 0.001, SE = 0.001, p<0.5). Table 5 presents outcomes of moderation analysis; Fig 1 visualizes the moderation effect).

Table 5

Moderation analysis testing social health as a moderator between the relationships of physical health and post-traumatic stress symptoms.

Variable	B	SE B	LLCI	ULCI	p
Gender (ref: male)
Female	-0.22	0.62	-1.45	1.00	0.72
Age (ref: 18–34)
35–54	0.35	0.73	-1.08	1.78	0.63
55+	-0.03	0.84	-1.68	1.63	0.98
Nationality (ref: Jordanian)
Syrian	0.28	0.68	-1.07	1.58	0.26
Other	-2.63	5.53	-13.51	8.25	0.70
Education (ref: less than high school)
High school	-0.36	0.37	-1.08	0.37	0.63
Above high school	-0.39	0.28	-0.94	0.15	0.98
Marital status (ref: other)
Married	-0.59	0.79	-2.13	0.96	0.46
Number of trauma (ref: none)
One time	0.24	0.73	-1.19	1.67	0.74
More than one time	1.83*	0.73	0.40	3.27	0.01
Physical health	-0.14***	0.05	-0.22	-0.06	0.000
Social health	-0.13***	0.03	-0.19	-0.07	0.000
Interaction (Physical health x Social health)	0.001*	0.001	0.0001	0.003	0.04
Intercept	25.28
R2	0.21
F	8.04***

* < .05, ** < .01

*** < .001.

Fig 1

Relationship between physical health and post-traumatic stress symptoms at low and high levels of social health.

Results from the J-N technique indicated the conditional effect of physical health on PTSD transitioned in significance when the summed score of social health was 61; b = -0.04, SE = 0.02, t = -1.97, p = .05, 95% CIs [-0.07, .00]. The relation between physical health and PTSS scores were significant when social health scores were below a score of 61 and non-significant with higher values of social health (61–100).

Step one of the mediation analysis demonstrated a negative and significant direct effect of social health on PTSS, b = -0.07, s.e. = .015, p = < .001, indicating those with lower social health scored higher on PTSS. Step 2 found that the direct effect of physical health on social health was positive and significant, b = .10, s.e. = .03, p < .01, indicating higher physical health scores were associated with higher social health. Step three indicated the total effect of physical health on PTSS was negative and significant, b = -0.07, s.e. = .011, p = < .001, demonstrating those with higher self-reported physical health scored lower on PTSS. Step 4 demonstrated the indirect effect of physical health on PTSS via social health was statistically significant [β = -.0083, 95% C.I. (-.0147, -.0016)]. Results therefore indicated a negative predictive relationship between physical health and PTSS as mediated through social health. See Fig 2 for a visualization of the mediated model.

Fig 2

Mediation model of social health in relationship between physical health and post-traumatic stress symptoms.

Values presented are standardized regression coefficients. The values in parentheses represents the coefficient for direct (without mediator) path.

Discussion

The primary aim of our study was to explore the mediating and moderating effect of social health on the relationship between PTSS and physical health. Numerous studies have illustrated the linear connection between social health, physical health, and PTSS however, few have examined whether social health plays a moderating or mediating role. Our findings indicated that social health mediated and moderated the association between physical health and PTSS, demonstrating that the relationship between physical health and PTSS may depend on an individual’s level of social health. It is likely this relationship exists because individuals who experience high PTSS and poor physical health may be less likely to participate in activities where social connections are present. However, greater social connections may create a positive influence on an individual’s psychological and physical well-being, thereby disrupting the relationship between PTS symptomology and poor physical health.

Consistent with past research, the present study found that lower social and physical health scores were significantly associated with higher PTSS [7, 54–56]. As previously demonstrated, individuals with high levels of social support are less likely to develop clinical levels PTSS than those who reported lower levels of support [57, 58]. Further, social support has also been linked to PTSS severity; those with lower levels of support report more severe and chronic symptoms. Similarly, research has illustrated that higher PTSS have a relationship with greater physical health difficulties [6, 7, 59]. Our study results, therefore, add to the extensive literature connecting PTSS, social, and physical health.

We also found that higher social health was related to greater physical health. The causal relationship between social and physical health is well documented [60, 61]. Research has also indicated that social relationships have a direct short and long-term impact on health, even when controlling for other variables that may influence mortality such as health behaviors and socioeconomic status [60, 62]. Our findings contribute to the body of research demonstrating the relationship between physical and social health.

Interestingly, our study found no significant differences between Syrians and Jordanians on social or physical health, although the Syrians did score significantly higher on PTSS. The mean PTSS scores, however, for both Jordanians and Syrians was above the clinical cutoff of 14 for probable diagnosis of PTSD [48]. Considering the Jordanian sample had low education and experienced high rates of poverty, it is not surprising that significant differences on physical and mental health would not exist. It is well documented that those with lower educational attainment from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds in areas directly or indirectly affected by conflict tend to have worse physical health and higher mental health-related symptoms [9, 30, 63, 64].

We also found that those with lower income scored significantly higher on PTSS and lower on social and physical health scores than wealthier respondents. This is not unexpected as many individuals from lower socio-economic backgrounds are at a higher risk for trauma exposure, have greater likelihood of housing instability and less access to resources such as medical care [65, 66]. As scholars have noted, the highest rates of PTSS in lower-income countries are often attributed to sociodemographic factors and trauma exposure where there is a lack of trained professionals and access to mental health services is low [9, 67].

Gender also appeared to influence physical health; males reported significantly higher physical health scores than females. This finding supports previous research that women, specifically in Jordan, are more likely to report lower physical health than men [68]. Other studies have indicated that inactivity, which can lead to poorer physical health, is higher among women than men in Arab culture [69]. Gender norms such as women needing to be chaperoned in public areas, conservative attire that is not appropriate for physical activity, and the lack of gender separate fitness centers have all been attributed to lower physical activity among women in countries such as Jordan [69-71]. A study examining Syrian women in Jordan found that displacement challenges such as access to healthcare, unemployment, financial difficulties, and lack of support systems are also contributing factors to compromised physical and mental health [2].

Surprisingly, we did not find significant gender differences on PTSS scores. Females did score slightly higher on PTSS than male respondents, however, the differences were not as substantial as previous studies examining gender differences in PTSD [72-74]. While research has consistently found that females report higher levels of PTSS, most of the studies have been conducted in non-Arab settings, therefore, cultural factors may have influenced our findings. Additionally, much of the research examining gender differences in PTSD have employed extensive clinical measures [74]. Our study, however, used the PCL-C, which is a screener for PTSS, but not a tool for clinical diagnoses.

Implications for policy and practice

Results from this study have implications for interventions designed to prevent mental and physical health related difficulties. Mental health support and NCD prevention in primary care is a growing field given the high rates of co-morbidity. The body of research in this area, specifically in LMICs and humanitarian settings, has significantly grown in the last decade, yet more research is needed to understand appropriate pathways to reduce mental health difficulties and manage or prevent physical health ailments. This is particularly relevant in LMICs with a large influx of displaced people, where much of the population is below the poverty level and without access to physical or mental health care [75]. The World Health Organization has recognized the global burden of NCDs and mental health and advocated for both in the international health agenda [76-78]. Therefore, our findings may inform NCD and mental health interventions in LMICs and humanitarian populations [79]. As Thoits [3] noted, it is crucial to understand intervening mechanisms such as social health on physical or mental health outcomes to design effective interventions.

Considering the high rate NCDs and mental health symptoms in this region, intervention approaches at the community level could be designed to increase individuals physical, social, and emotional well-being [30]. Such approaches may include integration of psychoeducation group work into the primary care setting informing individuals on common reactions to stress and trauma, the connection between post-traumatic stress and physical health, or on stress management. While this type of information does not require clinical mental health services, it may be a strategic way to reach those at risk for mental health-related symptoms. Activities which increase social interaction and inclusion could also be beneficial in health clinics and community centers. For example, activities for greater social contact could include religious events, participating in sporting events, or having community-based health and mental health education [80, 81].

Limitations

While this study provides novel findings on the moderating role of social health on physical health and PTSS, results should be considered in light of several limitations. First, our study is not generalizable to the wider population. The study was conducted in a region where many people (both Jordanian and Syrian) had high levels of PTSS. In the general global population, clinical rates of PTSS are much lower (approximately 3%) [82], therefore, additional studies in lower-risk populations would generalize the findings. Additionally, we used a self-reported measure of physical health. A more objective health measure, such as blood pressure, body mass index, or fasting blood glucose could further examine whether social health may influence prevention or management of specific NCDs such as hypertension or diabetes. It is also important to note that the reliability of the social health scale was acceptable (.65), however, future studies may want to employ a measure of social health designed specifically for an Arab population, which may yield higher reliability.

We also were unable to identify selection bias because we do not have information on how many people were approached by their doctor to participate in the study, who opted into the study from viewing the fliers that were posted in the health centers, and who fit the inclusion criteria, but opted out of the study. Finally, the data used for this study was cross-sectional, therefore longitudinal causal relationships cannot be determined.

Conclusion

The interplay of physical and mental health is complex and multifaceted. It is therefore crucial to understand the mechanisms which may influence or act as a buffer for adverse health and mental health outcomes. As the field is continuing to explore the interrelationship between physical health, PTSS, and social health our study contributes to the growing body of research on this area of inquiry. Findings will inform future research examining traumatic stress-related mental health conditions and factors such as social health that may not only buffer those symptoms but also moderate physical health and PTSS. This is particularly relevant in LMICs such as Jordan that have absorbed hundreds of thousands of refugees over the past decade. While humanitarian responses have focused on mental and physical health-related conditions independently, the connection between physical and mental health has been well established. Studies should continue to examine the interrelationship of mental, physical and social health of displaced and other high-risk populations.

20 Jul 2020

PONE-D-20-11520

Post-traumatic stress, social, and physical health: A mediation and moderation analysis of Jordanians and Syrian refugees in border communities

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Powell,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 03 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Neil J. Vincent, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. During our internal checks, the in-house editorial staff noted that you conducted research or obtained samples in another country. Please check the relevant national regulations and laws applying to foreign researchers and state whether you obtained the required permits and approvals. Please address this in your ethics statement in both the manuscript and submission information.

3. Thank you for including your competing interests statement; "I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Shang-Ju Li is an employee of the funding organization, Americares"

Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

4.

We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

5.

Please include your tables as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual files. Please note that supplementary tables (should remain/ be uploaded) as separate "supporting information" files

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. The study holds valuable information and advancement in the understanding of Syrian refugees and host community populations’ physical and mental health in the Jordan.

The following are my comments:

In general, the manuscript would benefit from English professional editing. There are many places with spelling issues, grammatical issues and other issues that can be addressed.

Abstract:

The abstract need to include the results of the difference between Syrian refugees and local Jordanians at high risk of physical and mental health ailments. Such comparison needs to be also included in the results section, since it is well established that Syrian refugees have many physical and mental health issues due to experiencing multiple traumatic events of the war. However, Jordanians have not experienced such events and therefore such comparison is required.

Background:

The title needs to be changed. It is the Syrian Crisis and its impacts in Jordan, or Syrian refugees in Jordan.

In the second paragraph, it is important to state that the number of Syrian refugees registered are by UNHCR in Jordan. Jordan has hosted more than 1.4 million Syrian refugees, who are not registered by UNHCR.

Page 4: Please write the full term of PTS, since it can be confused with PTSD.

Page 5: Forced migration, please change the tem to forced displacement, since migration is associated with a choice.

Page 6: the authors say “… which may be due to a lack of medications and appropriate health care, coupled with high risk for mental health issues that is caused by trauma these individuals may have experienced in their country of origin (33)”. Syrian refugees suffer from extreme poverty and insufficient resources that prevent them from seeking care. In Jordan, health care is private and very expensive. These consideration needs to be taken into account when considering the reasons to why Syrian refugees have high prevalence rates of NCDs.

Please consider including the following in the background literature review and references:

Al-Rousan T, Schwabkey Z, Jirmanus L, Nelson BD. Health needs and priorities of Syrian refugees in camps and urban settings in Jordan: perspectives of refugees and health care providers. East Mediterr Heal J. 2018; 24(3):243–53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26719/2018.24.3.243

Ibraheem B Al, Kira IA, Aljakoub J, Ibraheem A Al. The health effect of the Syrian conflict on IDPs and refugees. Peace Confl. 2017; 23(2):140–52. Available from: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/pac0000247

Rizkalla N, Segal SP. Well-being and posttraumatic growth among Syrian refugees in Jordan. J Trauma Stress. 2018; 31(2):213–22. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/jts.22281

Rizkalla et al. Women in refuge: Syrian women voicing health sequelae due to war traumatic experiences and displacement challenges. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109909

Social, physical, and mental health

Please start this paragraph with the definition of social health.

Please include the hostility among Jordanian towards Syrian refugees and the lack of work permit by the Jordanian government, which limits the income of refugees and their social interactions and may therefore have a negative impact on their self-control, self-concept, and self-worth. You may consider this reference as well:

Achilli L. Syrian refugees in Jordan: a reality check. Migr Policy Cent Eur Univ Inst. 2015; 2(February):1–12. Available from: http://www.reach-initiative.org/wp-content/

The background is a bit confusing, since it is focuses on the Syrian refugees and their physical and mental health. However, the authors states in page 7 that their study aims at examining the physical and mental health “within a Jordanian community near the Syrian border”. Where is the literature review related to the Jordanian community? The statistic of physical and mental health issue in Jordan is completely different than the one related to the Syrian refugees!!!

Methods

Page 7: Please state that the fliers with information on the study were in Arabic.

Page 8: Who were the research team trained by the PI? Were they Arabic speakers? Jordanians? Syrians? Both? Please specify their educational background as well since they may have affected the responses of participants.

Page 8: “self- report questionnaires” means that the participants have filled out the survey independently. However, according to the explanation provided, the research team helped participants with the survey. Did they interview them or only answered questions when needed?

Please add ethical issues related to anonymous participation, confidentiality, incentives if provided, oral consent form or written consent form, etc.

Page 9: Reliability of social health scale is low. Asking refugees who hardly find the means to eat or for transportation to reach their illegal work places about “attended social, religious, or recreation activities” is problematic. Please include this as part of the study limitations.

Page 10: Usually the measures section starts with the description of demographics. Please relocate.

Page 11: How was the mediation effects tested? Were they also done via SPSS PROCESS? Please clarify.

Page 11: “We adjusted for the effect of sociodemographic correlates (age, gender, nationality, trauma exposure, and education level) in the moderation and mediation models.” Income needs to also be included with the controlled variables. If the authors found that all participants were low on income, they need to indicate that this was the reason to not include this variable as one of the controlled variables.

Page 12: Please indicate results related to the comparison between Jordanians and Syrians, other than the obvious “Syrians reported significantly higher PTS scores than Jordanians”. If there were no other differences, please indicate that. I also think that all the analyses need to be divided into Jordanians and Syrians to see the difference between the two groups, especially because of the large sample size. Also, who are the “others” in the sample? Are they Palestinians?

Discussion

Though the findings are important in the field of trauma studies, they lack addressing the specific population. Syrian refugees who were uprooted and displaced, naturally lack the social connections and interactions that Jordanians have. Therefore, the whole analyses need to address these differences both in the results section and the discussion. The authors only mention this comparison in page 14. Please re-write the discussion to put these results upfront.

Also, please add into the results and discussion what were the main traumatic events experienced by Jordanians, since for the Syrians, the war events are obvious.

Page 15: Gender differences in PTSD among Syrian refugees can also be found in: Rizkalla N, Segal SP. War can harm intimacy: consequences for refugees who escaped Syria. J Glob Health. 2019; 9(2):1–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.020407

Page 17: “For example, activities for greater social contact could include religious events, participating in sporting events, or having community-based health and mental health education”. Please consider adding a budget for transportation or allocating buses/taxes, especially with activities related to Syrian refugees, so they can actually attend.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

4 Sep 2020

In general, the manuscript would benefit from English professional editing. There are many places with spelling issues, grammatical issues and other issues that can be addressed.

We appreciate the feed back on this. We have previously sent it to a copyeditor for two rounds of editing and have sent it a third time to correct any potential grammatical issues.

Abstract

The abstract need to include the results of the difference between Syrian refugees and local Jordanians at high risk of physical and mental health ailments. Such comparison needs to be also included in the results section, since it is well established that Syrian refugees have many physical and mental health issues due to experiencing multiple traumatic events of the war. However, Jordanians have not experienced such events and therefore such comparison is required.

We have added this information in the abstract. Syrians did score significantly higher on post-traumatic stress symptoms, however, did not have differences on self-reported physical health. This is also presented in the tables, the results and the discussion.

Background

The title needs to be changed. It is the Syrian Crisis and its impacts in Jordan, or Syrian refugees in Jordan.

Thank you for your feedback on this. We have edited the title. Since we have a sample of Jordanians and Syrians we included Jordanians in the title. This paper is based on a larger study examining the impact of a health awareness intervention in Jordan. The reason we included both Jordanians and Syrians in the sample is because the project was done in a Ministry of Health clinic that served both non-camp Syrians and low-income Jordanians. It was therefore, unethical to not include Jordanians in the study and only offer the health awareness intervention to Syrians. Additionally, because this was done in a Ministry of Health clinic, there were restrictions from the Jordanian government to exclude Jordanians from the study.

In the second paragraph, it is important to state that the number of Syrian refugees registered are by UNHCR in Jordan. Jordan has hosted more than 1.4 million Syrian refugees, who are not registered by UNHCR.

We have added in the estimated unregistered Syrians to the paragraph.

Page 4: Please write the full term of PTS, since it can be confused with PTSD. We have changed this to represent clinical rates of Post-traumatic stress and spelled out the acronym.

We recognize this may be confusing so changed the term throughout the manuscript to be PTSS rather than PTS symptoms.

Page 5: Forced migration, please change the term to forced displacement, since migration is associated with a choice.

This has been changed

Page 6: the authors say “… which may be due to a lack of medications and appropriate health care, coupled with high risk for mental health issues that is caused by trauma these individuals may have experienced in their country of origin (33)”. Syrian refugees suffer from extreme poverty and insufficient resources that prevent them from seeking care. In Jordan, health care is private and very expensive. These consideration needs to be taken into account when considering the reasons to why Syrian refugees have high prevalence rates of NCDs.

We have added in the suggested literature expanding the discussion. We have also added in additional literature about the prevalence of NCDs in Jordanians as the paper is focusing on both Syrians and Jordanians. The rates of NCDs and co-morbid mental health symptoms is also high among Jordanians and we added the literature to account for this.

Social, physical, and mental health

Please start this paragraph with the definition of social health.

We have changed the paragraph to begin with the definition of social health and also edited the section for clarity.

The background is a bit confusing, since it is focuses on the Syrian refugees and their physical and mental health. However, the authors states in page 7 that their study aims at examining the physical and mental health “within a Jordanian community near the Syrian border”. Where is the literature review related to the Jordanian community?

Thank you for this insight. In revising the paper, we recognize that we did not have enough information in the background about physical and mental health difficulties among Jordanians. We have added a bit more of a discussion to include NCD and mental health statistics among Jordanians. Syrians do experience very high rates of NCDs and mental health difficulties, however, low-income Jordanians also experience high rates of NCDs and are disproportionately affected by mental health struggles. This is due to living in poverty with scarce resources. Additionally, our sample was collected in a community very close to the Syrian border, and our sample included Jordanians and Syrians

Methods

Page 7: Please state that the fliers with information on the study were in Arabic.

We have added this

Page 8: Who were the research team trained by the PI? Were they Arabic speakers? Jordanians? Syrians? Both? Please specify their educational background as well since they may have affected the responses of participants.

We have added the following: The research team included three Jordanian staff employed by the Royal Health Awareness Society (RHAS) and two ministry of health nurses all fluent in Arabic; two United States based Americares staff; and one university researcher.

Page 8: “self- report questionnaires” means that the participants have filled out the survey independently. However, according to the explanation provided, the research team helped participants with the survey. Please add ethical issues related to anonymous participation, confidentiality, incentives if provided, oral consent form or written consent form, etc.

We have clarified this to: The questionnaire was administered through researcher assisted self-completion to ensure comprehension of the survey items. The ministry of health nurses and RHAS staff read the questions in Arabic, repeating and clarifying if the study participants expressed any difficulties with comprehension.

We also have added additional information about the consenting procedures in this section.

Page 10: Usually the measures section starts with the description of demographics. Please relocate.

We have added this to the beginning of the measures section

Page 11: How was the mediation effects tested? Were they also done via SPSS PROCESS? Please clarify.

We conducted all analyses in SPSS 27 and re-located that information to the bottom of the statistical analysis section.

Page 11: “We adjusted for the effect of sociodemographic correlates (age, gender, nationality, trauma exposure, and education level) in the moderation and mediation models.” Income needs to also be included with the controlled variables. If the authors found that all participants were low on income, they need to indicate that this was the reason to not include this variable as one of the controlled variables. Most of the sample made less than 500 JD a month (91.2%), therefore we excluded this as a control variable.

Page 12:

Please indicate results related to the comparison between Jordanians and Syrians, other than the obvious “Syrians reported significantly higher PTS scores than Jordanians”. If there were no other differences, please indicate that.

We have indicated that there were no other differences beyond PTSS between Syrians and Jordanians. This is also reported in the abstract, table and discussion.

I also think that all the analyses need to be divided into Jordanians and Syrians to see the difference between the two groups, especially because of the large sample size.

Thank you for the suggestion on the analysis. Our primary research question is to understand mediation and moderation mechanisms rather than comparing Jordanians versus Syrians. Thus, splitting the analysis would distract the results from our primary research goal. On the other hand, we agree that the reviewer raises an interesting further question on whether the effects differ by nationality, and we ran further models with an interaction term with nationality. None of the interaction terms are significant, and thus for better readability of the tables we retained the original format.

Who are the “others” in the sample? Are they Palestinians?

In table 1 we also edited nationality to represent other included Egyptian (n=2) and Palestinian (n=1)

Discussion

Though the findings are important in the field of trauma studies, they lack addressing the specific population. Syrian refugees who were uprooted and displaced, naturally lack the social connections and interactions that Jordanians have. Therefore, the whole analyses need to address these differences both in the results section and the discussion. The authors only mention this comparison in page 14.

Thank you for this insight. We did not find any differences between nationalities on social health, therefore, while the Syrians may naturally lack social connections, we are unable to assert this in the discussion. We did note the differences of social and physical health and PTSS in the results section between nationality and it is provided in Table 3.

We do have a qualitative paper under review, however, that does discuss this in more detail. Since this paper is focusing on the mediating and moderating role of social health on the relationship of physical health and PTSS, we felt this may be outside of the scope of the paper.

Also, please add into the results and discussion what were the main traumatic events experienced by Jordanians, since for the Syrians, the war events are obvious.

We have added a table (table 2) and described the specific trauma experiences among Syrians and Jordanians.

Page 15: Gender differences in PTSD among Syrian refugees can also be found in: Rizkalla N, Segal SP. War can harm intimacy: consequences for refugees who escaped Syria. J Glob Health. 2019; 9(2):1–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.020407

We have added some additional information and the citation from this article.

8 Oct 2020

Post-traumatic stress, social, and physical health: A mediation and moderation analysis of Syrian refugees and Jordanians in a border community

PONE-D-20-11520R1

Dear Dr. Powell,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Neil J. Vincent, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

15 Oct 2020

PONE-D-20-11520R1

Post-traumatic stress, social, and physical health: A mediation and moderation analysis of Syrian refugees and Jordanians in a border community

Dear Dr. Powell:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Neil J. Vincent

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE