Literature DB >> 33094381

The effects of density dependence and habitat preference on species coexistence and relative abundance.

Yi Zheng1, Fengmin Huang1, Minxia Liang1, Xubing Liu1, Shixiao Yu2.   

Abstract

In plant communities, some mechanisms maintain differences in species' abundances, while other mechanisms promote coexistence. Asymmetry in conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD) and/or habitat preference is hypothesized to shape relative species abundance, whereas community compensatory trends (CCTs) induced by community-level CNDD and heterospecific facilitation are hypothesized to promote coexistence. We use survey data from three 1-ha permanent dynamic plots in a subtropical forest over the course of a decade to find out which of these processes are important and at which life-history stages (the seedling, sapling, and juvenile stages) they exert their effects. CNDD was not related to abundance in any of the life-history stages. Suitable habitats positively influenced plant abundance at all tested life stages, but especially so for juveniles. Community-level CNDD of seedling neighbors was detected at the seedling stage, while heterospecific facilitation was detected across all tested life-history stages. A CCT in seedling survival was detected, but there was no evidence for such trends across the other life-history stages. Altogether, our results suggest that habitat specificity increases the rarity of species, whereas a CCT at the seedling stage, which is likely to be induced by CNDD and heterospecific facilitation, enables such species to maintain their populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abundance; Compensatory trend; Density dependence; Habitat preference; Phylogenetic distance

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33094381     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-020-04788-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  23 in total

1.  Pervasive density-dependent recruitment enhances seedling diversity in a tropical forest.

Authors:  K E Harms; S J Wright; O Calderón; A Hernández; E A Herre
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Conspecific negative density dependence and forest diversity.

Authors:  Daniel J Johnson; Wesley T Beaulieu; James D Bever; Keith Clay
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Community-level consequences of density dependence and habitat association in a subtropical broad-leaved forest.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Xiangcheng Mi; Liza S Comita; Liwen Zhang; Haibao Ren; Keping Ma
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Asymmetric density dependence shapes species abundances in a tropical tree community.

Authors:  Liza S Comita; Helene C Muller-Landau; Salomón Aguilar; Stephen P Hubbell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  More closely related species are more ecologically similar in an experimental test.

Authors:  Jean H Burns; Sharon Y Strauss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Positive interactions in communities.

Authors:  M D Bertness; R Callaway
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Measuring the demographic impact of conspecific negative density dependence.

Authors:  Evan C Fricke; S Joseph Wright
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale.

Authors:  Joseph A LaManna; Scott A Mangan; Alfonso Alonso; Norman A Bourg; Warren Y Brockelman; Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin; Li-Wan Chang; Jyh-Min Chiang; George B Chuyong; Keith Clay; Richard Condit; Susan Cordell; Stuart J Davies; Tucker J Furniss; Christian P Giardina; I A U Nimal Gunatilleke; C V Savitri Gunatilleke; Fangliang He; Robert W Howe; Stephen P Hubbell; Chang-Fu Hsieh; Faith M Inman-Narahari; David Janík; Daniel J Johnson; David Kenfack; Lisa Korte; Kamil Král; Andrew J Larson; James A Lutz; Sean M McMahon; William J McShea; Hervé R Memiaghe; Anuttara Nathalang; Vojtech Novotny; Perry S Ong; David A Orwig; Rebecca Ostertag; Geoffrey G Parker; Richard P Phillips; Lawren Sack; I-Fang Sun; J Sebastián Tello; Duncan W Thomas; Benjamin L Turner; Dilys M Vela Díaz; Tomáš Vrška; George D Weiblen; Amy Wolf; Sandra Yap; Jonathan A Myers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Bias in the detection of negative density dependence in plant communities.

Authors:  Matteo Detto; Marco D Visser; S Joseph Wright; Stephen W Pacala
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  Experimental evidence for a phylogenetic Janzen-Connell effect in a subtropical forest.

Authors:  Xubing Liu; Minxia Liang; Rampal S Etienne; Yongfan Wang; Christian Staehelin; Shixiao Yu
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 9.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.