Literature DB >> 33093998

Delayed recovery from paraplegia following resections of thoracic meningiomas.

Ahmed Ashry1, Ayman Tarek Mahmoud1, Mohamed Gabr1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this retrospective study, we evaluated the patterns of postoperative recovery for patients who were initially paraplegic before the excision of thoracic spine meningiomas. We also determined how the various prognostic factors impacted outcomes.
METHODS: Twenty patients with paraplegia underwent surgical excision of thoracic spine meningiomas at 2016- 2019. Patients' demographics, clinical, radiological data, operative details, histopathology, and postoperative complications were recorded; patients were reassessed at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients improved postoperatively, becoming, ambulatory with/without assistance; only six remained paraplegic. Poor prognostic factors for postoperative motor recovery included larger tumor size, longer duration of preoperative symptoms/paraplegia, and greater severity of sensory loss.
CONCLUSION: For 6/20 patients with thoracic meningiomas, poor postoperative recovery of motor function correlated with larger tumor size, longer duration of preoperative symptoms/paraplegia, and more severe sensory loss. Copyright:
© 2020 Surgical Neurology International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meningioma; Outcome; Paraplegic; Spinal; Surgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 33093998      PMCID: PMC7568120          DOI: 10.25259/SNI_575_2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol Int        ISSN: 2152-7806


INTRODUCTION

Spinal meningiomas are benign slow-growing tumors that usually present with back pain in 50% of cases. Clinical findings vary including sensorimotor deficits, radicular pain, and sphincter dysfunction.[5,9] This wide range of clinical findings may cause difficulties in timely diagnosis. Surgical excision is the cornerstone of treatment with favorable outcomes in most cases. Nevertheless, profound preoperative motor weakness has been suggested as a predictor associated with poor results.[2,6] The improvement in microsurgical techniques, neuroimaging technologies, and rehabilitation programs has further improved postoperative outcomes.[1,8] However, since some patients presented late with paraplegia, it is extremely difficult to predict the prognosis. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes for 20 patients who were paraplegic before the resection of thoracic meningiomas. Our aim was to identify the poor prognostic factors negatively impacting postoperative motor recovery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After approval from the Institutional Review Board, we retrospectively analyzed 20 patients all of whom were paraplegic before the surgical resection of thoracic spine meningiomas (2016–2019). Patients were followed for at least 1 postoperative year. Preoperatively, multiple clinical (e.g., including genetic evaluation for Type 2 neurofibromatosis), radiological (e.g., MR studies documenting tumor location), and surgical parameters were recorded for all 20 patients.

Demographic and clinical data

Patients averaged 49.25 years of age and 15 were female. The accompanying diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 2 was established in 3 cases (15%). Initial symptoms were present for an average of 12.55 months, while the duration of preoperative paraplegia averaged 16.15 days (range 3–60 days). All patients presented with complete motor paraplegia and sphincter dysfunction. Sensory loss was partial in 11 cases (55%) and complete in the remainder (9 cases: 45%) [Table 1].
Table 1:

Demographic, clinical, radiological, and pathological data of the patients.

Demographic, clinical, radiological, and pathological data of the patients.

Radiological data for MR findings of thoracic meningiomas

Tumors were assigned three locations; five T1-T4 upper thoracic, seven T5-T8 mid-thoracic, and eight T9-T12 lower thoracic lesions. In 10 cases, tumors occupied more than 75% of the spinal canal. In addition, 13 tumors (65%) involved 1 or 2 levels, while 7 tumors (35%) extended over three levels or more levels. Dural attachments were posterior (2 cases), anterolateral (7 cases), and posterolateral (11 cases). On MR, in 8 cases, focal hyperintense intramedullary T2W signals were seen at the tumor levels [Table 1]. Following typical laminectomies, patients’ neurological motor outcomes were assessed up to 1 year postoperatively.

Statistical analysis

Data were coded and entered using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Comparisons between quantitative variables were done using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test. For comparing categorical data, Chi-square (2) test was performed. Exact test was used instead when the expected frequency is <5. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Surgical and pathological data

Through midline laminectomies, all intradural extramedullary tumors were completely excised utilizing central debulking techniques followed by careful arachnoid dissection from the sites of dural attachment [Figure 1]. Postoperatively, the length of hospital stay ranged from 3 days to 21 days (mean 5.25 days). Histopathological examinations confirmed benign meningiomas in all 20 cases; lesions were categorized as transitional (7 cases), meningothelial (11 cases), and psammomatous (2 cases).
Figure 1:

(a) Sagittal view of MRI thoracic spine with contrast showing T7 meningioma (b) Intraoperative view showing a spinal meningioma compressing the spinal cord (c) Intraoperative view after complete excision of the lesion and coagulation of the dural attachment.

(a) Sagittal view of MRI thoracic spine with contrast showing T7 meningioma (b) Intraoperative view showing a spinal meningioma compressing the spinal cord (c) Intraoperative view after complete excision of the lesion and coagulation of the dural attachment.

Postoperative complications

There were no mortalities, but three postoperative complications (15%); one superficial wound infection (i.e., resolved on antibiotics), one cerebrospinal fluid leak (i.e., treated with lumbar drain), and one pulmonary embolism (i.e., routinely managed).

Outcomes

Six months and 1 year postoperatively, eight patients fully recovered motor function; six could walk with assistance (Grade I Modified Levy Score), while six remained unchanged. Of interest, sensory function improved in 12 patients (60%), while 10 patients (50%) regained sphincter control.

Major predictors of poor outcomes

Poor prognostic factors for postoperative recovery of motor/ sensory function for patients with preoperative paraplegia attributed to spinal meningiomas included longer duration of preoperative paraplegia and sensory deficits, and larger tumor size [Table 2].
Table 2:

Prognostic factors for motor power improvement.

Prognostic factors for motor power improvement.

DISCUSSION

Spinal meningiomas account for 25–46% of all primary spinal cord tumors that most typically involve the thoracic spine in females. The duration of symptoms may vary from several months to years.[4,10] Delays in diagnosis and surgery may lead to irreversible neurological injury.[2,11] We found a significant negative correlation between the preoperative duration and severity of motor and sensory deficits, and quality of outcomes; other reports do not support these findings.[2] Of interest, all patients who experienced recovery of motor function had surgery within 2 weeks following the onset of paraplegia, while partial rather than complete sensory loss was a positive prognostic sign. Larger tumors are typically associated with poor outcomes as validated in our series.[7] However, there was no significant correlation between the number of levels impacted by tumor and outcome.[7]

Prognostic factors: Motor deficit and preoperative MR findings

In our study, 70% of the patients improved after surgery (e.g., all having been operated upon within 2 weeks of the onset of paraplegia) and became ambulatory with or without assistance. Nevertheless, other authors have found that poor preoperative neurological status was an independent predictor for poor outcomes [Table 3].[2,3] Further, although Maiti et al. determined that preoperative MR T2 hyperintense cord signals were poor prognostic findings, this was not corroborated in our series.[7]
Table 3:

Review of literature.

Review of literature.

Histopathology

In our study, all the spinal meningiomas were benign, meningothelial lesions (55%) (World Health Organization Grade I); this finding was in accordance with the literature.[8] Notably, we found no significant correlation between the histopathological type and the postoperative outcome.

CONCLUSION

About 70% of patients who are paraplegic for up to 2 weeks before resection of thoracic meningiomas may exhibit adequate delayed postoperative recovery.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Spinal meningiomas: clinicoradiological factors predicting recurrence and functional outcome.

Authors:  Tanmoy K Maiti; Shyamal C Bir; Devi Prasad Patra; Piyush Kalakoti; Bharat Guthikonda; Anil Nanda
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.047

2.  Results of spinal meningioma surgery in patients with severe preoperative neurological deficits.

Authors:  C Haegelen; X Morandi; L Riffaud; S F A Amlashi; E Leray; G Brassier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Factors Leading to a Poor Functional Outcome in Spinal Meningioma Surgery: Remarks on 173 Cases.

Authors:  Antonino Raco; Alessandro Pesce; Giada Toccaceli; Maurizio Domenicucci; Massimo Miscusi; Roberto Delfini
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Spinal meningiomas: prognosis and recovery factors in 22 cases with severe motor deficits.

Authors:  P Ciappetta; M Domenicucci; A Raco
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.209

5.  Calcified Spinal Meningiomas.

Authors:  Andrea Gennaro Ruggeri; Benedetta Fazzolari; Davide Colistra; Martina Cappelletti; Nicola Marotta; Roberto Delfini
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Spinal meningiomas: a 20-year review.

Authors:  A T King; M M Sharr; R W Gullan; J R Bartlett
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.596

7.  Review of 36 cases of spinal cord meningioma.

Authors:  F Gezen; S Kahraman; Z Canakci; A Bedük
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  A less invasive surgical concept for the resection of spinal meningiomas.

Authors:  A Boström; U Bürgel; P Reinacher; T Krings; V Rohde; J M Gilsbach; F J Hans
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Spinal cord meningioma.

Authors:  W J Levy; J Bay; D Dohn
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Spinal meningiomas: critical review of 131 surgically treated patients.

Authors:  I Erol Sandalcioglu; Anja Hunold; Oliver Müller; Hischam Bassiouni; Dietmar Stolke; Siamak Asgari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.134

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Two out of three of octogenarians benefitted from delayed resection of spinal meningiomas.

Authors:  Ville Vasankari; Roel Hubert Louis Haeren; Mika Niemela; Miikka Korja
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-12-08

2.  Recovery Potential of Spinal Meningioma Patients With Preoperative Loss of Walking Ability Following Surgery - A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Ville Vasankari; Roel Haeren; Mika Niemelä; Miikka Korja
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-01-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.