Literature DB >> 33093775

The right upper lobe bronchus angle: A tool for differentiating fibrotic and non-fibrotic sarcoidosis.

Mary Salvatore1,2, Danielle Toussie1, Nadiya Pavlishyn2, David Yankelevitz1, Timothy O'Connor1, Claudia Henschke1, Maria Padilla3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the Right Upper Lobe Bronchus Angle (RUL-BA) on chest CT in patients with Stage 4 sarcoidosis and compare to others with non-fibrotic sarcoidosis.
METHODS: IRB approval was obtained for review of all chest CT scans performed from January 2015 through December 2017 that contained the word sarcoidosis using the computer program Montage. The most recent CT scans of 633 people were reviewed. The patients' age and sex at the time of their most recent CT scan were recorded. The radiographic diagnosis and the Right Upper Lobe Bronchus Angle (RUL-BA) were determined by a chest radiologist with 20 years of experience.
RESULTS: The RUL-BA increased with Stage 4 sarcoidosis, measuring on average 104 degrees, compared to the average angle of 88 degrees for those without fibrotic sarcoid. More often men's CT scans exhibited the earlier stages of sarcoidosis, and a higher number of women's scans showed fibrotic sarcoidosis. As would be expected, scans with advanced disease were typically from older patients; however, there was no correlation between age and degree of fibrosis as measured by increasing RUL-BA.
CONCLUSION: The RUL-BA assists radiologists in differentiating fibrotic sarcoidosis from non-fibrotic sarcoidosis. Further research will determine if the RUL-BA measurement can help differentiate fibrotic sarcoid from other fibrotic lung diseases and if the angle can be used to follow disease progression. (Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2020; 37 (2): 99-103). Copyright:
© 2020 SARCOIDOSIS VASCULITIS AND DIFFUSE LUNG DISEASES.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chest CT scan; pulmonary fibrosis; sarcoid

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33093775      PMCID: PMC7569551          DOI: 10.36141/svdld.v37i2.8965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis        ISSN: 1124-0490            Impact factor:   0.670


Introduction

Sarcoidosis was first described by Hutchinson in 1869 (1). The exact cause of Sarcoidosis remains unknown, but an unidentified inhaled antigen is suspected because of the cell-mediated response (2) and lung involvement in 90% of patients (1). The prevalence of sarcoidosis in the United States is reported as 50 per 100,000 among Caucasians and 141 per 100,000 among African Americans. The fibrotic form of the disease has a 16% 10-year mortality rate and is associated with significant morbidity caused by concomitant aspergillosis, pulmonary artery hypertension and respiratory exacerbations (2). Classically the Scadding Staging System (SSS) has been used to group Sarcoidosis into 5 stages based on chest x-ray findings. Stage 0 is normal lung, Stage 1 demonstrates hilar lymphadenopathy, Stage 2 has parenchymal nodules and hilar lymphadenopathy, Stage 3 has parenchymal nodules alone and Stage 4 has fibrotic lung disease (3). The Scadding Staging System can be applied to findings on cross sectional imaging, which is more sensitive and parallels findings on pathology including perilymphatic distribution of parenchymal abnormalities (4). Stage 4 Sarcoidosis occurs in 20-25% of patients affected with the disease. It is irreversible and may require lung transplant as anti-inflammatory medications are usually ineffective at this stage. Stage 4 Sarcoidosis may cause a diagnostic challenge to differentiate from other types of fibrosis. Posterior displacement of the upper lobe bronchus due to volume loss is a known feature of the fibrotic stage (5). We suggest a method to quantify the amount of posterior bronchial displacement, which could potentially follow disease progression.

Methods

IRB approval was obtained for review of all chest CT scans that contained the word sarcoidosis (using the computer program Montage), performed from January 2015 through December 2017. The most recent CT scans of these 633 patients were reviewed by an experienced chest radiologist (MMS with 20 years of experience) and a radiology resident using lung window settings (W 1600, L -600). The patients’ age and gender were recorded. Patients with a pattern of fibrosis inconsistent with sarcoidosis were excluded. Sarcoidosis on CT was graded as follows: Grade 0: No CT evidence of thoracic disease Grade 1: Mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy without pulmonary nodules Grade 2: Mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy and perilymphatic pulmonary nodules Grade 3: Pulmonary nodules in a perilymphatic distribution without lymphadenopathy Grade 4: Sarcoidosis with pulmonary fibrosis Grade 4 was considered the fibrotic group, while Grades 0 through 3 represented the non-fibrotic group. The angle between a line traversing the right upper lobe bronchus and a sagittal line connecting the sternum to the vertebral body and tangential to the most medial aspect of bronchus was measured and recorded, as drawn below. The angle is called the Right Upper Lobe Bronchus Angle (RUL-BA) (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
Fig. 1.

Normal Right Upper Lobe Bronchial Angle (RUL-BA) measuring 88 degrees

Fig. 2.

Right upper lobe posterior predominant fibrosis causing retraction of the right upper lobe bronchus and increase in the Right Upper Lobe Bronchial Angle (RUL-BA) measuring 145 degrees

Normal Right Upper Lobe Bronchial Angle (RUL-BA) measuring 88 degrees Right upper lobe posterior predominant fibrosis causing retraction of the right upper lobe bronchus and increase in the Right Upper Lobe Bronchial Angle (RUL-BA) measuring 145 degrees The association between having fibrotic sarcoidosis and the RUL-BA was examined via logistic regression models. The full model compared the likelihood of having Stage 4 Sarcoidosis based on RUL-BA, adjusting for age and gender. A stepwise variable selection procedure was employed to find best model fit, as judged by Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The best model fit for fibrotic sarcoid was found with RUL-BA, adjusting for age. Furthermore, ROC curves were examined to evaluate balance between sensitivity and specificity

Results

Our initial study population consisted of 640 chest CT scans. 7 of these scans were excluded because the patients’ right upper lobe had been resected, 69 were excluded because the radiographic diagnosis was not consistent with patterns of sarcoid described in methods section, leaving 564 patients in our study population. The RUL-BA increased with Stage 4 Sarcoidosis, with an average angle of 104 degrees, compared to an average angle of 88 degrees for those without fibrotic sarcoid. As would be expected, scans with the later stage of disease were typically from older patients; however, there was no correlation between age and degree of fibrosis as measured by increasing RUL-BA (Table 1).
Table 1.

Results found on most recent chest CT scan of studied patients

Stage 0Stage 1Stage 2Stage 3Stage 4
# of patients14810310745161
Average age54(19-91)57(27-90)55(30-86)56(31-81)59(29-94)
% male58/148(39%)52/103(50%)60/103(58%)24/45(53%)70/162(43%)
Average RULBA88878987104
Range RULBA73-10570-10474-12067-9574-145
Results found on most recent chest CT scan of studied patients The logistic regression analysis resulted in a McFadden Pseudo-R2 of .39, indicating fair fit. RUL-BA was a significant predictor in the model, with a p value well under α = .05 (Table 2).
Table 2.

Logistic Regression Analysis Results of Fibrosis based on RULBA and adjusted by age

PredictorCoefficient (β)Odds Ratio95% Confidence Intervalp-value
Intercept-22.6331.481 x 10^-121.182 x 10^-12 - 9.423 10^-9< 0.0001
RULBA0.2221.2491.954 - 1.314< 0.0001
Age0.0191.021.0 - 1.040.049
Logistic Regression Analysis Results of Fibrosis based on RULBA and adjusted by age While holding age constant, for every one-degree increase in RUL-BA above 90 degrees, the odds of having fibrosis were 1.249 times higher. ROC Curve exploration resulted in an 88% in discriminatory ability (Figure 3).
Fig. 3.

ROC Curve exploration resulted in a discriminatory ability of 88%

ROC Curve exploration resulted in a discriminatory ability of 88%

Discussion

The diagnosis of sarcoidosis is made when a patient presents with expected clinical and radiographic findings and pathology showing noncaseating granulomas in a typical peri-lymphatic distribution. Chest x-ray has been used for staging disease with Scadding’s Staging System (3). Increasingly, chest CT is used to better define parenchymal abnormalities. In addition, Gallium studies and PET scans are used to determine disease activity and determine if anti-inflammatory medications might be beneficial. The RUL-BA is an ancillary CT tool that can act like an imaging biomarker when it is positive. Sarcoid is believed to be caused by an unidentified environmental agent as it effects the skin, eyes and lungs. In sarcoid, there is accumulation of granulomas consisting of centrally located macrophages and epitheliod cells surrounded by lymphocytes. The role of the granuloma is to limit inflammation and protect the body. Stage 4 sarcoid occurs when there is an increase in matrix metalloproteinases and a relative decrease in their inhibitors. There is increased fibronectin and CCL18 that increases collagen deposition (6). Sarcoid is an upper lobe predominant disease along with tuberculosis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis and they all cause the formation of granulomas. The upper lobe to lower lobe lung ventilation ratio is 3:1 whereas the lung lower lobe to upper lobe perfusion ratio is 6:1. Big particles are removed from the trachea by mucociliary clearance, but small particles can get to the alveoli and need to be removed by lymphatics whose function is related to perfusion. The lymphatics work less well in the lung apices, likely the reason why granulomas have an upper lobe predilection (7). Hypersensitivity pneumonitis is caused by an inhaled antigen, so it is not surprising that there is an upper lobe predominant disease. Tuberculosis is inhaled as well, and it also has an upper lobe predilection – but more specifically in the posterior aspects of the upper lobes. Sarcoidosis has the same distribution and in fact, serum samples of patients with sarcoid contain mycobacterial antigen antibodies, supporting the idea that sarcoid is an immune response to environmental pathogen (8). Lung fibrosis is an end stage disease, but we must differentiate the various types of end stage fibrosis because it will potentially lead to better outcomes as new treatments are developed. Currently, glucocorticosteroids or second-line drugs (methotrexate or azathioprine) are still recommended, monoclonal antibodies have a limited application in patients with sarcoidosis; anti-fibrotics are currently in clinical trials. Preliminary results using mesenchymal cells obtained from umbilical cord blood show promise for treating sarcoidosis (9). Although there are limited options for treatment of end-stage fibrosis, as treatments are developed the importance of a simple and specific diagnostic test will increase. The use of the RUL-BA can help differentiate patients with fibrotic versus non-fibrotic sarcoid which is important because the treatments and prognosis is different. Our study has limitations. The use of Montage to identify patients with the word sarcoid in their report has potentially caused selection bias, additional research will be needed in patients with a clinical diagnosis of sarcoid, which was staged with chest x-ray to see if the angle can be used as a tool to differentiate fibrotic from nonfibrotic disease on cross sectional imaging.
  9 in total

1.  Prognosis of intrathoracic sarcoidosis in England. A review of 136 cases after five years' observation.

Authors:  J G SCADDING
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1961-11-04

Review 2.  Sarcoidosis.

Authors:  Michael C Iannuzzi; Benjamin A Rybicki; Alvin S Teirstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Pulmonary sarcoidosis.

Authors:  Paolo Spagnolo; Giulio Rossi; Rocco Trisolini; Nicola Sverzellati; Robert P Baughman; Athol U Wells
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 30.700

Review 4.  Upper lobe-predominant diseases of the lung.

Authors:  Stefan F Nemec; Alexander A Bankier; Ronald L Eisenberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Reprint of: The pathology of pulmonary sarcoidosis: update.

Authors:  YanLing Ma; Anthony Gal; Michael Koss
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 6.  Pulmonary fibrosis in sarcoidosis. Clinical features and outcomes.

Authors:  Karen C Patterson; Mary E Strek
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2013-08

7.  Serum anti-mycobacterial heat shock proteins antibodies in sarcoidosis and tuberculosis.

Authors:  Anna Dubaniewicz; Susanne Kämpfer; Mahavir Singh
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 3.131

Review 8.  [Advances in differential diagnosis and treatment of patients with sarcoidosis].

Authors:  Tadeusz Płusa
Journal:  Pol Merkur Lekarski       Date:  2018-03-27

Review 9.  Imaging of sarcoidosis of the airways and lung parenchyma and correlation with lung function.

Authors:  Hilario Nunes; Yurdagul Uzunhan; Thomas Gille; Christine Lamberto; Dominique Valeyre; Pierre-Yves Brillet
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 16.671

  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Radiology in Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease.

Authors:  Ahmad Abu Qubo; K M Capaccione; Elana J Bernstein; Maria Padilla; Mary Salvatore
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.