| Literature DB >> 33093644 |
Iga Hołyńska-Iwan1, Karolina Szewczyk-Golec2.
Abstract
The measurement of electric potential and resistance reflect the transport of sodium and chloride ions which take place in keratinocytes and is associated with skin response to stimuli arising from external and internal environment. The aim of the study was to assess changes in electrical resistance and the transport of chloride and sodium ions, under iso-osmotic conditions and following the use of inhibitors affecting these ions' transport, namely amiloride (A) and bumetanide (B). The experiment was performed on 104 fragments of rabbit skin, divided into three groups: control (n = 35), A-inhibited sodium transport (n = 33) and B-inhibited chloride transport (n = 36). Measurement of electrical resistance (R) and electrical potential (PD) confirmed tissue viability during the experiment, no statistically significant differences in relation to control conditions were noted. The minimal and maximal PD measured during stimulation confirmed the repeatability of the recorded reactions to the mechanical and mechanical-chemical stimulus for all examined groups. Measurement of PD during stimulation showed differences in the transport of sodium and chloride ions in each of the analyzed groups relative to the control. The statistical analysis of the PD measured in stationary conditions and during mechanical and/or mechanical-chemical stimulation proved that changes in sodium and chloride ion transport constitute the physiological response of keratinocytes to changes in environmental conditions for all applied experimental conditions. Assessment of transdermal ion transport changes may be a useful tool for assessing the skin condition with tendency to pain hyperactivity and hypersensitivity to xenobiotics.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33093644 PMCID: PMC7581804 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75275-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Values of analyzed parameters of skin specimens.
| Incubation/stimulation solution | Stationary conditions | Stimulation conditions (15 s) | Wilcoxon test ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | R (Ω*cm2) | PD (mV) | PDmin (mV) | PDmax (mV) | PD vs. PDmin | PD vs. PDmax | PDmin vs. PDmax |
| Median | 844 | − 0.25 | − 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.253 | ||
| Lower quartile | 438 | − 0.66 | − 0.95 | − 0.12 | |||
| Upper quartile | 1360 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 | |||
| Median | 1024 | − 0.31 | − 0.45 | 0 | |||
| Lower quartile | 740 | − 1.04 | − 1.27 | − 0.94 | |||
| Upper quartile | 1563 | 0.18 | − 0.09 | 0.69 | |||
| Median | 894 | − 0.23 | − 1.16 | 0 | |||
| Lower quartile | 610 | − 1.9 | − 2.32 | − 1.77 | |||
| Upper quartile | 1136 | 0.12 | 0 | 0.37 | |||
| RH vs. A | 0.013 | 0.585 | |||||
| RH vs. B | 0.929 | 0.238 | |||||
| A vs. B | 0.142 | 0.062 | 0.119 | ||||
RH isoosmotic Ringer solution, A inhibited sodium transport by amiloride (0.1 mM), B inhibited chloride transport by bumetanide (0.1 mM), PD transepithelial potential difference of epithelial skin surface measured in stationary conditions (mV), PDmin minimal transepithelial potential difference during 15 s stimulation of epithelial skin surface (mV), PDmax maximal transepithelial potential difference during 15 s stimulation of epithelial skin surface (mV), R resistance measured in stationary conditions (Ω*cm2), italic values indicate a level of significance p < 0.05.
Figure 1Voltage of tissue samples during stimulation with the following solutions. (a) Ringer solution as an incubation and bathing fluid, as well as a mechanical stimulation—the control group. (b) Bumetanide solution as an incubation and bathing fluid, as well as a mechanical–chemical stimulation—the group of inhibited chloride ion transport. (c) Amiloride solution as an incubation and bathing fluid, as well as a mechanical–chemical stimulation—the group of inhibited sodium ion transport. Time-courses of single experiments are presented, showing the most frequently observed electrophysiological responses to stimulation. The arrows indicate mechanical (Ringer solution) or mechanical–chemical stimulation (bumetanide or amiloride).
Figure 2Study design. n number of skin specimens, RH Ringer solution, PD transepithelial potential difference of skin surface (mV) in stationary conditions, PDmin minimal transepithelial potential difference during 15 s stimulation of skin surface (mV), PDmax maximal transepithelial potential difference during 15 s stimulation of skin surface (mV), R resistance (Ω*cm2).