| Literature DB >> 33093526 |
Huiqing He1, Xiangjing Qin2, Fangyun Dong1, Jingmin Ye1, Chunbao Xu3, Hanhui Zhang1, Zhanmei Liu1, Xiaojing Lv1, Yuehua Wu1, Xuhong Jiang4, Xingan Cheng5,6.
Abstract
The invasion of Spodoptera frugiperda has imposed a serious impact on global food security. Matrine is a botanical pesticide with a broad spectrum of insecticidal activity which was recommended for controlling Spodoptera frugiperda. In order to discover effective insecticide for Spodoptera frugiperda, two matrine derivatives modified with carbon disulfide and nitrogen-containing groups were systhesized. And their inhibition activities on Sf9 cell were evaluated. The structural configuration of compounds were characterized by IR, HPLC, MS, NMR and XRD, with yields of 52% and 65%, respectively. The IC50 of the two newly synthesized compounds on Sf9 cell reduced to 0.648 mmol/L and 1.13 mmol/L, respectively, compared with that of matrine (5.330 mmol/L). In addition, microscopic observation of Sf9 cell treated with the compounds showed that the number of adherent cells decreased, the cells shrunk, vacuolated and apoptotic bodies appeared. The two newly synthesized compounds exhibited better inhibitory effect on Sf9 cell than that of the parent matrine, suggesting that the positive effect of the introduction of 1-pyrrolidinecarbodithioate and diethylcarbamodithioate groups to matrine. The morphological observation of Sf9 cell induced by derivatives indicated that apoptosis induction may be a mechanism that inhibits insect cell proliferation and exerts insecticidal effect.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33093526 PMCID: PMC7581774 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75053-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Synthesis of matrine derivative compounds 1 and 2.
Figure 2IR spectra of the obtained matrine derivative compounds 1 and 2.
Figure 3HPLC chromatograms of sophocarpine (a), and compounds 1 (b) and 2 (c).
Crystallographic data and details of refinement for compounds 1 ~ 2.
| Matrine derivatives | Compound 1 | Compound 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Empirical formula | C20H31N3OS2 | C20H37N3O3S2 |
| Formula weight | 393.62 | 431.67 |
| Crystal system | Monoclinic | Monoclinic |
| Space group | P21 | P21 |
| a/Å | 12.1713 (2) | 14.5071 (4) |
| b/Å | 5.27090 (10) | 5.21060 (10) |
| c/Å | 15.5687 (3) | 14.7222 (4) |
| α/° | 90 | 90 |
| β/° | 101.992 (2) | 95.066 (2) |
| γ/° | 90 | 90 |
| Volume/Å3 | 976.99 (3) | 1108.51 (5) |
| Z | 2 | 2 |
| μ/mm−1 | 2.576 | 2.381 |
| F(000) | 426.3 | 470.6 |
| Reflections collected | 9331 | 9965 |
| Independent reflections | 3685 [Rint = 0.0228] | 4340 [Rint = 0.0344] |
| Goodness-of-fit on F2 | 1.030 | 1.028 |
| Final R indexes [I ≥ 2σ (I)] | R1 = 0.0440, wR2 = 0.1290 | R1 = 0.0428, wR2 = 0.1234 |
| Final R indexes [all data] | R1 = 0.0442, wR2 = 0.1292 | R1 = 0.0455, wR2 = 0.1241 |
Bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) of sophocarpine and compounds 1 ~ 2.
| Sophocarpine | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| C12–C13 | 1.4925 (16) | C12–C13–C14 | 120.73 (10) |
| C13–C14 | 1.3229 (18) | C13–C14–C15 | 121.78 (11) |
| C14–C15 | 1.478 (16) | N16–C15–C14 | 117.84 (10) |
Figure 4Crystal structure (a, c) and the pack pictures (b, d) of compounds 1 and 2.
Figure 5The growth curve of Sf9 cell treated with 1.0% DMSO compared with the blank control group (a), inhibition rate of Sf9 cell after treatment with matrine (b), and compounds 1 (c) and 2 (d).
Figure 6Analysis of proliferation and cell morphological changes (200 ×) of Sf9 cell in 1.0% DMSO as the control (a–c) or induced by matrine (d–f), compound 1 (g–i), or compound 2 (j–l) at 24, 48 and 72 h.
IC50 of matrine and compounds 1 and 2 against Sf9 cell.
| Compounds | IC50 (mmol/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | |
| Matrine | 8.586 | 5.402 | 5.336 |
| Compound 1 | 1.271 | 0.938 | 0.648 |
| Compound 2 | 4.646 | 1.389 | 1.130 |