Christopher N Morrison1,2, Elinore J Kaufman3, David K Humphreys4, Douglas J Wiebe5. 1. From the Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 3. Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care & Emergency Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 4. Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. 5. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Firearm homicides occur less frequently in US states with more firearm control laws. However, firearms are easily transported across state lines, and laws in one location may affect firearm violence in another. This study examined associations between within-state firearm laws and firearm homicide while accounting for interference from laws in other nearby states. METHODS: The units of analysis were 3,107 counties in the 48 contiguous US states, arrayed in 15 yearly panels for 2000 to 2014 (n = 46,605). The dependent measure was firearm homicides accessed from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Compressed Mortality Data. The main independent measures were counts of firearm laws and the proportion of laws within categories (e.g., background checks, child access prevention laws). We calculated these measures for interstate laws using a geographic gravity function between county centroids. Bayesian conditional autoregressive Poisson models related within-state firearm laws and interstate firearm laws to firearm homicides. RESULTS: There were 172,726 firearm homicides in the included counties over the 15 years. States had between 3 and 100 firearm laws. Within-state firearm laws (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.995, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.992, 0.997) and interstate firearm laws (IRR = 0.993, 95% CI = 0.990, 0.996) were independently associated with fewer firearm homicides, and associations for within-state laws were strongest where interstate laws were weakest. CONCLUSIONS: Additional firearm laws are associated with fewer firearm homicides both within the states where the laws are enacted and elsewhere in the United States. Interference from interstate firearm laws may bias associations for studies of within-state laws and firearm homicide.
BACKGROUND: Firearm homicides occur less frequently in US states with more firearm control laws. However, firearms are easily transported across state lines, and laws in one location may affect firearm violence in another. This study examined associations between within-state firearm laws and firearm homicide while accounting for interference from laws in other nearby states. METHODS: The units of analysis were 3,107 counties in the 48 contiguous US states, arrayed in 15 yearly panels for 2000 to 2014 (n = 46,605). The dependent measure was firearm homicides accessed from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Compressed Mortality Data. The main independent measures were counts of firearm laws and the proportion of laws within categories (e.g., background checks, child access prevention laws). We calculated these measures for interstate laws using a geographic gravity function between county centroids. Bayesian conditional autoregressive Poisson models related within-state firearm laws and interstate firearm laws to firearm homicides. RESULTS: There were 172,726 firearm homicides in the included counties over the 15 years. States had between 3 and 100 firearm laws. Within-state firearm laws (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.995, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.992, 0.997) and interstate firearm laws (IRR = 0.993, 95% CI = 0.990, 0.996) were independently associated with fewer firearm homicides, and associations for within-state laws were strongest where interstate laws were weakest. CONCLUSIONS: Additional firearm laws are associated with fewer firearm homicides both within the states where the laws are enacted and elsewhere in the United States. Interference from interstate firearm laws may bias associations for studies of within-state laws and firearm homicide.
Authors: Eric W Fleegler; Lois K Lee; Michael C Monuteaux; David Hemenway; Rebekah Mannix Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-05-13 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Erin G Andrade; Mark H Hoofnagle; Elinore Kaufman; Mark J Seamon; Adam R Pah; Christopher N Morrison Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 3.697
Authors: Atheendar S Venkataramani; Elizabeth F Bair; Rourke L O'Brien; Alexander C Tsai Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Natasha Ruth Saunders; Charlotte Moore Hepburn; Anjie Huang; Claire de Oliveira; Rachel Strauss; Lisa Fiksenbaum; Paul Pageau; Ning Liu; David Gomez; Alison Macpherson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Sarabeth A Spitzer; Joseph D Forrester; Lakshika Tennakoon; David A Spain; Thomas G Weiser Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2022-04-08