Literature DB >> 33091757

Evaluation of microbial contamination of different pork carcass areas through culture-dependent and independent methods in small-scale slaughterhouses.

Maria Francesca Peruzy1, Kurt Houf2, Marie Joossens3, Zhongjia Yu2, Yolande Therese Rose Proroga4, Nicoletta Murru5.   

Abstract

Routine evaluation of the slaughter process is performed by the enumeration of the aerobic colony count, Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella spp. on the carcass through destructive or non-destructive methods. With non-destructive methods, bacteria are counted from a minimum area of 100 cm2 in different sampling sites on the pork carcasses, and the results of these investigated areas are pooled to one value for the complete carcass evaluation (a total of 400 cm2). However, the composition of the bacterial community present on the different sampling areas remains unknown. The aim of the study was to characterize the microbial population present on four areas (ham, back, jowl and belly) of eight pork carcasses belonging to two different slaughterhouses through culture-dependent (Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry MALDI-TOF MS, combined with 16S rRNA gene sequencing) and complementary culture-independent (16S rRNA amplicon sequencing) methods. The presence of Salmonella spp. and Y. enterocolitica was additionally assessed. Using MALDI-TOF MS, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and Escherichia coli were found to dominate the bacterial cultures isolated from the 8 carcasses. Based on the 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing analyses however, no specific genus clearly dominated the bacterial community composition. By using this culture-independent method, the most abundant genera in microbial populations of the ham, back, jowl and belly were found to be similar, but important differences between the two slaughterhouses were observed. Thus, present data suggests that the indigenous bacterial population of individual animals is overruled by the microbial population of the slaughterhouse in which the carcass is handled. Also, our data suggests that sampling of only one carcass area by official authorities may be appropriate for the evaluation of the hygienic status of the carcasses and therefore of the slaughter process.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S amplicon sequencing; MALDI TOF MS; Microbiological community; Pork carcass; Salmonella spp.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33091757     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  5 in total

1.  A risk assessment model for Salmonella spp. in swine carcasses.

Authors:  Athanasios Chalias; Luca Grispoldi; Beniamino Cenci Goga
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  Similar Carcass Surface Microbiota Observed Following Primary Processing of Different Pig Batches.

Authors:  Charlotte Braley; Philippe Fravalo; Marie-Lou Gaucher; Guillaume Larivière-Gauthier; Fanie Shedleur-Bourguignon; Jessie Longpré; Alexandre Thibodeau
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 6.064

3.  Analysis of microbiota structure in cooked ham as influenced by chemical composition and processing treatments: Identification of spoilage bacteria and elucidation on contamination route.

Authors:  Carla María Blanco-Lizarazo; Andrea Sierra-Cadavid; Alejandra M Montoya R; Juan Camilo Ospina-E
Journal:  Curr Res Food Sci       Date:  2022-04-19

Review 4.  Microbiological Safety and Shelf-Life of Low-Salt Meat Products-A Review.

Authors:  Coral Barcenilla; Avelino Álvarez-Ordóñez; Mercedes López; Ole Alvseike; Miguel Prieto
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-08-04

5.  Consumers' Perception and Preference for the Consumption of Wild Game Meat among Adults in Poland.

Authors:  Ewa Czarniecka-Skubina; Dariusz M Stasiak; Agnieszka Latoch; Tomasz Owczarek; Jadwiga Hamulka
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-03-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.