Julie G Fisher1, David Tait1, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer2, Susan Halabi3, Pam K Mangat4, Julian C Schink5, Ricardo H Alvarez6, Dan Veljovich7, Timothy L Cannon8, Pamela A Crilley9, Theodore Pollock10, Carmen J Calfa11, Tareq Al Baghdadi12, Ramya Thota13, Nicole Fleming14, Jared A Cotta11, Andrew L Rygiel2, Sasha L Warren2, Richard L Schilsky2. 1. Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA. 2. American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2318 Mill Road, Alexandria, VA, 22314, USA. 3. Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. 4. American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2318 Mill Road, Alexandria, VA, 22314, USA. TAPURPublications@asco.org. 5. Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Chicago, IL, USA. 6. Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, GA, USA. 7. Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA. 8. Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA, USA. 9. Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 10. Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Tulsa, OK, USA. 11. Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. 12. Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, Ypsilanti, MI, USA. 13. Intermountain Precision Genomics Cancer Clinic, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 14. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Sugarland, TX, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) Study, a phase II basket study, evaluates anti-tumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in patients with advanced cancers harboring genomic alterations known as drug targets. OBJECTIVE: With no known genomic targets predictive of sensitivity to cetuximab, cetuximab was evaluated in patients with breast cancer (BC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and ovarian cancer (OC), without KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with advanced BC, NSCLC, and OC received a cetuximab loading dose, then weekly infusions (250 mg/m2 over 60 min). A Simon two-stage design, requiring ten patients in stage I, was employed per each disease-specific cohort. The primary endpoint was disease control (objective response or stable disease for at least 16 weeks). If two or more patients in stage I achieved disease control, the cohort would enroll 18 more patients in stage II. Power and alpha of the design are 85% and 10%, respectively. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: Patients with BC (n = 10), NSCLC (n = 10), and OC (n = 29) were enrolled between June 2016 and September 2018. No objective responses or stable disease for at least 16 weeks were observed in the BC and NSCLC cohorts. No objective responses and four patients with stable disease for at least 16 weeks were observed in the OC cohort. Six of 49 patients reported grade 3 or higher adverse events or serious adverse events at least possibly related to cetuximab. CONCLUSIONS: Cetuximab does not have clinical activity in patients with advanced BC, NSCLC, and OC without KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF mutations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02693535 (26 February, 2016).
BACKGROUND: The Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) Study, a phase II basket study, evaluates anti-tumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in patients with advanced cancers harboring genomic alterations known as drug targets. OBJECTIVE: With no known genomic targets predictive of sensitivity to cetuximab, cetuximab was evaluated in patients with breast cancer (BC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and ovarian cancer (OC), without KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with advanced BC, NSCLC, and OC received a cetuximab loading dose, then weekly infusions (250 mg/m2 over 60 min). A Simon two-stage design, requiring ten patients in stage I, was employed per each disease-specific cohort. The primary endpoint was disease control (objective response or stable disease for at least 16 weeks). If two or more patients in stage I achieved disease control, the cohort would enroll 18 more patients in stage II. Power and alpha of the design are 85% and 10%, respectively. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS:Patients with BC (n = 10), NSCLC (n = 10), and OC (n = 29) were enrolled between June 2016 and September 2018. No objective responses or stable disease for at least 16 weeks were observed in the BC and NSCLC cohorts. No objective responses and four patients with stable disease for at least 16 weeks were observed in the OC cohort. Six of 49 patients reported grade 3 or higher adverse events or serious adverse events at least possibly related to cetuximab. CONCLUSIONS:Cetuximab does not have clinical activity in patients with advanced BC, NSCLC, and OC without KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF mutations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02693535 (26 February, 2016).
Authors: Edward S Kim; Marcus Neubauer; Allen Cohn; Lee Schwartzberg; Lawrence Garbo; John Caton; Francisco Robert; Craig Reynolds; Terry Katz; Sreeni Chittoor; Lorinda Simms; Scott Saxman Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Roy S Herbst; Mary W Redman; Edward S Kim; Thomas J Semrad; Lyudmila Bazhenova; Gregory Masters; Kurt Oettel; Perry Guaglianone; Christopher Reynolds; Anand Karnad; Susanne M Arnold; Marileila Varella-Garcia; James Moon; Philip C Mack; Charles D Blanke; Fred R Hirsch; Karen Kelly; David R Gandara Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Thomas J Lynch; Taral Patel; Luke Dreisbach; Michael McCleod; William J Heim; Robert C Hermann; Eugene Paschold; Nicholas O Iannotti; Shaker Dakhil; Steven Gorton; Virginie Pautret; Martin R Weber; Donald Woytowitz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-01-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Meagan B Myers; Malathi Banda; Karen L McKim; Yiying Wang; Michael J Powell; Barbara L Parsons Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Erik J van Helden; Lindsay Angus; C Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Eline Boon; Suzanne C van Es; Sandra A Radema; Carla M L van Herpen; Derk Jan A de Groot; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Maurice P H M Jansen; Stefan Sleijfer; Henk M W Verheul Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Carmen J Allegra; J Milburn Jessup; Mark R Somerfield; Stanley R Hamilton; Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Pamela K McAllister; Roscoe F Morton; Richard L Schilsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-02 Impact factor: 44.544