Literature DB >> 33090333

Cetuximab in Patients with Breast Cancer, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, and Ovarian Cancer Without KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF Mutations: Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) Study.

Julie G Fisher1, David Tait1, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer2, Susan Halabi3, Pam K Mangat4, Julian C Schink5, Ricardo H Alvarez6, Dan Veljovich7, Timothy L Cannon8, Pamela A Crilley9, Theodore Pollock10, Carmen J Calfa11, Tareq Al Baghdadi12, Ramya Thota13, Nicole Fleming14, Jared A Cotta11, Andrew L Rygiel2, Sasha L Warren2, Richard L Schilsky2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) Study, a phase II basket study, evaluates anti-tumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in patients with advanced cancers harboring genomic alterations known as drug targets.
OBJECTIVE: With no known genomic targets predictive of sensitivity to cetuximab, cetuximab was evaluated in patients with breast cancer (BC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and ovarian cancer (OC), without KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with advanced BC, NSCLC, and OC received a cetuximab loading dose, then weekly infusions (250 mg/m2 over 60 min). A Simon two-stage design, requiring ten patients in stage I, was employed per each disease-specific cohort. The primary endpoint was disease control (objective response or stable disease for at least 16 weeks). If two or more patients in stage I achieved disease control, the cohort would enroll 18 more patients in stage II. Power and alpha of the design are 85% and 10%, respectively. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety.
RESULTS: Patients with BC (n = 10), NSCLC (n = 10), and OC (n = 29) were enrolled between June 2016 and September 2018. No objective responses or stable disease for at least 16 weeks were observed in the BC and NSCLC cohorts. No objective responses and four patients with stable disease for at least 16 weeks were observed in the OC cohort. Six of 49 patients reported grade 3 or higher adverse events or serious adverse events at least possibly related to cetuximab.
CONCLUSIONS: Cetuximab does not have clinical activity in patients with advanced BC, NSCLC, and OC without KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF mutations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02693535 (26 February, 2016).

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33090333     DOI: 10.1007/s11523-020-00753-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Target Oncol        ISSN: 1776-2596            Impact factor:   4.493


  19 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic and Predictive Value in KRAS in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Review.

Authors:  Kevin Wood; Thomas Hensing; Raeva Malik; Ravi Salgia
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 2.  Molecular pathogenesis and extraovarian origin of epithelial ovarian cancer--shifting the paradigm.

Authors:  Robert J Kurman; Ie-Ming Shih
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  ASCO Provisional Clinical Opinion: KRAS, Cetuximab, and Panitumumab-Clinical Implications in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Roscoe F Morton; Elizabeth H Hammond
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 4.  New insights into the pathogenesis of serous ovarian cancer and its clinical impact.

Authors:  Keren Levanon; Christopher Crum; Ronny Drapkin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Docetaxel or pemetrexed with or without cetuximab in recurrent or progressive non-small-cell lung cancer after platinum-based therapy: a phase 3, open-label, randomised trial.

Authors:  Edward S Kim; Marcus Neubauer; Allen Cohn; Lee Schwartzberg; Lawrence Garbo; John Caton; Francisco Robert; Craig Reynolds; Terry Katz; Sreeni Chittoor; Lorinda Simms; Scott Saxman
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Cetuximab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab versus carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab in advanced NSCLC (SWOG S0819): a randomised, phase 3 study.

Authors:  Roy S Herbst; Mary W Redman; Edward S Kim; Thomas J Semrad; Lyudmila Bazhenova; Gregory Masters; Kurt Oettel; Perry Guaglianone; Christopher Reynolds; Anand Karnad; Susanne M Arnold; Marileila Varella-Garcia; James Moon; Philip C Mack; Charles D Blanke; Fred R Hirsch; Karen Kelly; David R Gandara
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Cetuximab and first-line taxane/carboplatin chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the randomized multicenter phase III trial BMS099.

Authors:  Thomas J Lynch; Taral Patel; Luke Dreisbach; Michael McCleod; William J Heim; Robert C Hermann; Eugene Paschold; Nicholas O Iannotti; Shaker Dakhil; Steven Gorton; Virginie Pautret; Martin R Weber; Donald Woytowitz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Breast Cancer Heterogeneity Examined by High-Sensitivity Quantification of PIK3CA, KRAS, HRAS, and BRAF Mutations in Normal Breast and Ductal Carcinomas.

Authors:  Meagan B Myers; Malathi Banda; Karen L McKim; Yiying Wang; Michael J Powell; Barbara L Parsons
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.715

9.  RAS and BRAF mutations in cell-free DNA are predictive for outcome of cetuximab monotherapy in patients with tissue-tested RAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Erik J van Helden; Lindsay Angus; C Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Eline Boon; Suzanne C van Es; Sandra A Radema; Carla M L van Herpen; Derk Jan A de Groot; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Maurice P H M Jansen; Stefan Sleijfer; Henk M W Verheul
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 10.  American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy.

Authors:  Carmen J Allegra; J Milburn Jessup; Mark R Somerfield; Stanley R Hamilton; Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Pamela K McAllister; Roscoe F Morton; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and Obstacles in Applying Therapeutical Indications Formulated in Molecular Tumor Boards.

Authors:  Edoardo Crimini; Matteo Repetto; Paolo Tarantino; Liliana Ascione; Gabriele Antonarelli; Elena Guerini Rocco; Massimo Barberis; Luca Mazzarella; Giuseppe Curigliano
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  Therapeutic potential of CDK4/6 inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Rebecca A Sager; Sarah J Backe; Elham Ahanin; Garrett Smith; Imad Nsouli; Mark R Woodford; Gennady Bratslavsky; Dimitra Bourboulia; Mehdi Mollapour
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 16.430

3.  Bayesian and frequentist approaches to sequential monitoring for futility in oncology basket trials: A comparison of Simon's two-stage design and Bayesian predictive probability monitoring with information sharing across baskets.

Authors:  Alexander Kaizer; Emily Zabor; Lei Nie; Brian Hobbs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  The Role of Master Protocols in Pediatric Drug Development.

Authors:  Robert M Nelson; Laurie S Conklin; Wendy J Komocsar; Fei Chen; Forrest Williamson; Wallace V Crandall
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 1.337

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.