Literature DB >> 33089942

Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

Anita Lyubenova1, Dipika Neupane1,2, Brooke Levis1,2,3, Yin Wu1,2,4, Ying Sun1, Chen He1,2, Ankur Krishnan1, Parash M Bhandari1,2, Zelalem Negeri1,2, Mahrukh Imran1, Danielle B Rice1,5, Marleine Azar1,2, Matthew J Chiovitti1, Nazanin Saadat1, Kira E Riehm1,6, Jill T Boruff7, John P A Ioannidis8,9,10,11, Pim Cuijpers12, Simon Gilbody13, Lorie A Kloda14, Scott B Patten15,16,17, Ian Shrier1,2,18, Roy C Ziegelstein19, Liane Comeau20, Nicholas D Mitchell21,22, Marcello Tonelli23, Simone N Vigod24, Franca Aceti25, Jacqueline Barnes26, Amar D Bavle27, Cheryl T Beck28, Carola Bindt29, Philip M Boyce30,31, Adomas Bunevicius32, Linda H Chaudron33, Nicolas Favez34,35, Barbara Figueiredo36, Lluïsa Garcia-Esteve37,38,39, Lisa Giardinelli40, Nadine Helle29, Louise M Howard41,42, Jane Kohlhoff43,44,45, Laima Kusminskas46, Zoltán Kozinszky47, Lorenzo Lelli40, Angeliki A Leonardou48, Valentina Meuti25, Sandra N Radoš49, Purificación N García37,50, Susan J Pawlby41, Chantal Quispel51, Emma Robertson-Blackmore52, Tamsen J Rochat53,54, Deborah J Sharp55, Bonnie W M Siu56, Alan Stein57,58, Robert C Stewart59,60, Meri Tadinac61, S Darius Tandon62, Iva Tendais36, Annamária Töreki63, Anna Torres-Giménez37,38,39, Thach D Tran64, Kylee Trevillion41, Katherine Turner65, Johann M Vega-Dienstmaier66, Andrea Benedetti2,67,68, Brett D Thombs1,2,4,5,68,69,70.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Estimates of depression prevalence in pregnancy and postpartum are based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) more than on any other method. We aimed to determine if any EPDS cutoff can accurately and consistently estimate depression prevalence in individual studies.
METHODS: We analyzed datasets that compared EPDS scores to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) major depression status. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to compare prevalence with EPDS cutoffs versus the SCID.
RESULTS: Seven thousand three hundred and fifteen participants (1017 SCID major depression) from 29 primary studies were included. For EPDS cutoffs used to estimate prevalence in recent studies (≥9 to ≥14), pooled prevalence estimates ranged from 27.8% (95% CI: 22.0%-34.5%) for EPDS ≥ 9 to 9.0% (95% CI: 6.8%-11.9%) for EPDS ≥ 14; pooled SCID major depression prevalence was 9.0% (95% CI: 6.5%-12.3%). EPDS ≥14 provided pooled prevalence closest to SCID-based prevalence but differed from SCID prevalence in individual studies by a mean absolute difference of 5.1% (95% prediction interval: -13.7%, 12.3%).
CONCLUSION: EPDS ≥14 approximated SCID-based prevalence overall, but considerable heterogeneity in individual studies is a barrier to using it for prevalence estimation.
© 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; depression prevalence; individual participant data meta-analysis; major depression; structured clinical interview for DSM

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33089942      PMCID: PMC7992289          DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 1049-8931            Impact factor:   4.182


  40 in total

1.  A comparison of three screening tools to identify perinatal depression among low-income African American women.

Authors:  S Darius Tandon; Fallon Cluxton-Keller; Julie Leis; Huynh-Nhu Le; Deborah F Perry
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 4.839

2.  Postnatal psychiatric morbidity: a validation study of the GHQ-12 and the EPDS as screening tools.

Authors:  Purificación Navarro; Carlos Ascaso; Lluïsa Garcia-Esteve; Jaume Aguado; Anna Torres; Rocío Martín-Santos
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.238

3.  Validation of the subscales of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in a sample of women with unsettled infants.

Authors:  Jane Phillips; Margaret Charles; Louise Sharpe; Stephen Matthey
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.839

4.  Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in Spanish mothers.

Authors:  Lluïsa Garcia-Esteve; Carlos Ascaso; Julia Ojuel; Puri Navarro
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 5.  Reliability and validity studies of the WHO--Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review.

Authors:  H U Wittchen
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.791

6.  Antenatal risk factors for postnatal depression: a prospective study of Chinese women at maternal and child health centres.

Authors:  Bonnie W M Siu; Shirley S L Leung; Patrick Ip; Se Fong Hung; Michael W O'Hara
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Successful five-item triage for the broad spectrum of mental disorders in pregnancy - a validation study.

Authors:  Chantal Quispel; Tom A J Schneider; Witte J G Hoogendijk; Gouke J Bonsel; Mijke P Lambregtse-van den Berg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  Comparison of depression prevalence estimates in meta-analyses based on screening tools and rating scales versus diagnostic interviews: a meta-research review.

Authors:  Brooke Levis; Xin Wei Yan; Chen He; Ying Sun; Andrea Benedetti; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Postpartum GAD is a risk factor for postpartum MDD: the course and longitudinal relationships of postpartum GAD and MDD.

Authors:  Jason Prenoveau; Michelle Craske; Nicholas Counsell; Valerie West; Beverley Davies; Peter Cooper; Elizabeth Rapa; Alan Stein
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 6.505

10.  Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Brooke Levis; Dean McMillan; Ying Sun; Chen He; Danielle B Rice; Ankur Krishnan; Yin Wu; Marleine Azar; Tatiana A Sanchez; Matthew J Chiovitti; Parash Mani Bhandari; Dipika Neupane; Nazanin Saadat; Kira E Riehm; Mahrukh Imran; Jill T Boruff; Pim Cuijpers; Simon Gilbody; John P A Ioannidis; Lorie A Kloda; Scott B Patten; Ian Shrier; Roy C Ziegelstein; Liane Comeau; Nicholas D Mitchell; Marcello Tonelli; Simone N Vigod; Franca Aceti; Rubén Alvarado; Cosme Alvarado-Esquivel; Muideen O Bakare; Jacqueline Barnes; Cheryl Tatano Beck; Carola Bindt; Philip M Boyce; Adomas Bunevicius; Tiago Castro E Couto; Linda H Chaudron; Humberto Correa; Felipe Pinheiro de Figueiredo; Valsamma Eapen; Michelle Fernandes; Barbara Figueiredo; Jane R W Fisher; Lluïsa Garcia-Esteve; Lisa Giardinelli; Nadine Helle; Louise M Howard; Dina Sami Khalifa; Jane Kohlhoff; Laima Kusminskas; Zoltán Kozinszky; Lorenzo Lelli; Angeliki A Leonardou; Beth A Lewis; Michael Maes; Valentina Meuti; Sandra Nakić Radoš; Purificación Navarro García; Daisuke Nishi; Daniel Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono; Emma Robertson-Blackmore; Tamsen J Rochat; Heather J Rowe; Bonnie W M Siu; Alkistis Skalkidou; Alan Stein; Robert C Stewart; Kuan-Pin Su; Inger Sundström-Poromaa; Meri Tadinac; S Darius Tandon; Iva Tendais; Pavaani Thiagayson; Annamária Töreki; Anna Torres-Giménez; Thach D Tran; Kylee Trevillion; Katherine Turner; Johann M Vega-Dienstmaier; Karen Wynter; Kimberly A Yonkers; Andrea Benedetti; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.035

View more
  6 in total

1.  Systematic review of mental health symptom changes by sex or gender in early-COVID-19 compared to pre-pandemic.

Authors:  Tiffany Dal Santo; Ying Sun; Yin Wu; Chen He; Yutong Wang; Xiaowen Jiang; Kexin Li; Olivia Bonardi; Ankur Krishnan; Jill T Boruff; Danielle B Rice; Sarah Markham; Brooke Levis; Marleine Azar; Dipika Neupane; Amina Tasleem; Anneke Yao; Ian Thombs-Vite; Branka Agic; Christine Fahim; Michael S Martin; Sanjeev Sockalingam; Gustavo Turecki; Andrea Benedetti; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Depressive symptoms during pregnancy and after birth in women living in Sweden who received treatments for fear of birth.

Authors:  Ingegerd Hildingsson; Christine Rubertsson
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Complex trait methylation scores in the prediction of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Miruna C Barbu; Carmen Amador; Alex S F Kwong; Xueyi Shen; Mark J Adams; David M Howard; Rosie M Walker; Stewart W Morris; Josine L Min; Chunyu Liu; Jenny van Dongen; Mohsen Ghanbari; Caroline Relton; David J Porteous; Archie Campbell; Kathryn L Evans; Heather C Whalley; Andrew M McIntosh
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Postnatal depression: identification of risk factors in the short-stay maternity program in Belgium. A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Julie Lelièvre; Titia Hompes; Birgitte Schoenmakers
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2021-12-14

5.  Screening for perinatal depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-9): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Larry Wang; Kurt Kroenke; Timothy E Stump; Patrick O Monahan
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 7.587

6.  Factor Structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in a Sample of Postpartum Slovak Women.

Authors:  Zuzana Škodová; Ľubica Bánovčinová; Eva Urbanová; Marián Grendár; Martina Bašková
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.