Literature DB >> 33089939

Basic principles of viscoelastic testing.

Timothy Carll1, Geoffrey D Wool1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Viscoelastic testing is a method of hemostatic analysis that provides a real-time, holistic view of ex vivo clotting. It allows for examination of both cellular and plasma protein contributions to clotting including platelet number and function, fibrin(ogen) function, and coagulation factor function. The method assesses physical clot properties during the transition of blood from a liquid to a gel state, either by measurement of clot shear modulus using physical force transduction or by measurement of clot resonance frequency using sonometric interrogation. Results are reported in a live trace, with different trace parameters reflecting different contributors to hemostasis. These reported parameters vary between testing platforms.
RESULTS: In the United States, there are several commonly used Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved viscoelastic instruments available on the market. Those instruments that use sonometric clot assessment are more recently available and allow for improved portability for use near the patient's bedside. These instruments generally feature different reagent kits that allow more specific interrogation of different hemostatic pathways. Viscoelastic testing can predict the results of traditional plasma-based coagulation assays and has the added benefit of detecting hypercoagulability and severe hyperfibrinolysis. Implementation of viscoelastic testing in many clinical settings is becoming widespread and has proven to be efficacious in reducing blood transfusion rates in many settings. An impact on overall mortality and morbidity has not yet been demonstrated.
CONCLUSION: This article provides a narrative review of the basic principles of viscoelastic testing, including the science and technology behind the method, as well as currently available testing platforms and reagents.
© 2020 AABB.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hemostasis; transfusion practices (adult)

Year:  2020        PMID: 33089939     DOI: 10.1111/trf.16071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  8 in total

Review 1.  Anticoagulation Monitoring for Perioperative Physicians.

Authors:  Cheryl L Maier; Roman M Sniecinski
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 8.986

2.  Evaluation of Blood Coagulation by Optical Vortex Tracking.

Authors:  Jiaxing Gong; Yaowen Zhang; Hui Zhang; Qi Li; Guangbin Ren; Wenjian Lu; Jing Wang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Is it possible to improve prediction of outcome and blood requirements in the severely injured patients by defining categories of coagulopathy?

Authors:  Jean-Stéphane David; Arnaud Friggeri; Charles-Hervé Vacheron; Pierre Bouzat; Laurie Fraticelli; Clément Claustre; Marc Maegele; Kenji Inaba
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 4.  Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays: A Primer on Legacy and New Generation Devices.

Authors:  Oksana Volod; Connor M Bunch; Nuha Zackariya; Ernest E Moore; Hunter B Moore; Hau C Kwaan; Matthew D Neal; Mahmoud D Al-Fadhl; Shivani S Patel; Grant Wiarda; Hamid D Al-Fadhl; Max L McCoy; Anthony V Thomas; Scott G Thomas; Laura Gillespie; Rashid Z Khan; Mahmud Zamlut; Peter Kamphues; Dietmar Fries; Mark M Walsh
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  Thromboelastography for the Prevention of Perioperative Venous Thromboembolism in Orthopedics.

Authors:  Dejing Fan; Ziyao Ouyang; Yanping Ying; Shuangxia Huang; Pinyue Tao; Xiao Pan; Shuyu Lu; Qini Pan
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

Review 6.  Anticoagulation Strategies during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sasa Rajsic; Robert Breitkopf; Dragana Jadzic; Marina Popovic Krneta; Helmuth Tauber; Benedikt Treml
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  SkM-ing information from traumatized tissue.

Authors:  Philip J Crispin; Philip Y Choi; Elizabeth E Gardiner
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 16.036

8.  Which injured patients with moderate fibrinogen deficit need fibrinogen supplementation?

Authors:  Jean-Stephane David; Aline Lambert; Xavier-Jean Taverna; Pascal Incagnoli; Marie-Odile Geay-Baillat; Olivia Vassal; Arnaud Friggeri; Kenji Inaba
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.953

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.