Leanna Jean Travis1, Kali S Thomas2, Melissa A Clark3, Emmanuelle Belanger4. 1. 12321Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University. 2. 174610Brown University School of Public Health, Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI. 3. 174610Brown University School of Public Health. 4. 174610Brown University School of Public Health, Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There has been a rapid increase in the number of residential care/assisted living communities (RC/AL) that allow residents to die in place. The objective of this study was to examine the organizational characteristics of RC/AL communities that are associated with facility-level policies supportive of admitting and retaining residents in need of end-of-life (EOL) care. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from the 2010 National Survey of Residential Care Facilities. Organizational characteristics included structural factors, staffing levels, and other relevant facility-level policies. We examined descriptive statistics, binomial and multivariable multinomial regression models to determine the likelihood of 1) admitting and retaining, or 2) only retaining, as compared to 3) neither admitting nor retaining AL residents in need of EOL care. RESULTS: A majority of residential care facilities 73.7% (n = 22,642) reported admitting and retaining residents at EOL. Yet, levels of skilled nursing care were generally low with 60.9% of these RC/AL communities reporting that registered nurses were not available, including hospice staff. In multivariable, multinomial regression models, organizational characteristics such as skilled nursing, hands-on contact hours from personal care aides, and policies allowing exemptions to self-evacuation rules were associated with increased likelihood of RC/AL communities admitting/retaining residents in need of EOL care. CONCLUSION: Despite overall low levels of skilled nursing care, a nationally representative survey revealed that a majority of RC/AL communities admit and retain residents in need of EOL care. Staffing and exemptions from self-evacuation policies appear to be central characteristics associated with the provision of these services in RC/AL communities.
BACKGROUND: There has been a rapid increase in the number of residential care/assisted living communities (RC/AL) that allow residents to die in place. The objective of this study was to examine the organizational characteristics of RC/AL communities that are associated with facility-level policies supportive of admitting and retaining residents in need of end-of-life (EOL) care. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from the 2010 National Survey of Residential Care Facilities. Organizational characteristics included structural factors, staffing levels, and other relevant facility-level policies. We examined descriptive statistics, binomial and multivariable multinomial regression models to determine the likelihood of 1) admitting and retaining, or 2) only retaining, as compared to 3) neither admitting nor retaining AL residents in need of EOL care. RESULTS: A majority of residential care facilities 73.7% (n = 22,642) reported admitting and retaining residents at EOL. Yet, levels of skilled nursing care were generally low with 60.9% of these RC/AL communities reporting that registered nurses were not available, including hospice staff. In multivariable, multinomial regression models, organizational characteristics such as skilled nursing, hands-on contact hours from personal care aides, and policies allowing exemptions to self-evacuation rules were associated with increased likelihood of RC/AL communities admitting/retaining residents in need of EOL care. CONCLUSION: Despite overall low levels of skilled nursing care, a nationally representative survey revealed that a majority of RC/AL communities admit and retain residents in need of EOL care. Staffing and exemptions from self-evacuation policies appear to be central characteristics associated with the provision of these services in RC/AL communities.
Entities:
Keywords:
assisted living; end of life; hospice; palliative care; residential care communities
Authors: Philip D Sloane; Sheryl Zimmerman; Laura Hanson; C Madeline Mitchell; Charlene Riedel-Leo; Verita Custis-Buie Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Joan Hyde; Rosa Perez; Patrick J Doyle; Brent P Forester; Theodore H Whitfield Journal: Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 2.035
Authors: Joan M Teno; Pedro Gozalo; Amal N Trivedi; Jennifer Bunker; Julie Lima; Jessica Ogarek; Vincent Mor Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Meredith Dougherty; Pamela S Harris; Joan Teno; Amy M Corcoran; Cindy Douglas; Jackie Nelson; Deborah Way; Joan E Harrold; David J Casarett Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Pedro Gozalo; Joan M Teno; Susan L Mitchell; Jon Skinner; Julie Bynum; Denise Tyler; Vincent Mor Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 91.245