R Scheer1,2, E Crofton3,4, N Andrews3,5. 1. Occupational Therapy Department, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia. robynscheer@bigpond.com. 2. Department of Occupational Therapy, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Butterfield Street, Brisbane, Queensland, 4029, Australia. robynscheer@bigpond.com. 3. Occupational Therapy Department, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia. 4. School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia. 5. Recover Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To establish the intrarater reliability of lower limb circumference measures in a sample of individuals who are diagnosed with lower limb lymphoedema and to evaluate if change in limb position has an effect on the reliability of circumferential measures. METHOD: A sample of forty-one adults diagnosed with a lower limb lymphoedema were recruited. Participants had their affected leg measured three times by a qualified therapist during a standard outpatient appointment: twice in a lying position and once in sitting with knee flexed at 90°. To examine the intrarater reliability, interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confident intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Excellent intrarater reliability was established at each measurement point and for the sum of circumferential measures when the limb remeasured in the same position by the same therapist. Changing the position of the limb resulted in lower intrarater reliability values at 10 and 30 cm from the base of the foot. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides evidence for the intrarater reliability of lower limb circumference measures and highlights the need for consistency when remeasuring and monitoring the limb of those diagnosed with lower limb lymphoedema. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Lymphoedema is a significant problem for breast cancer survivors but also provides lifetime risk to all survivors of lymph node surgery for solid tumours. The monitoring and surveillance of leg circumference measures of people diagnosed with lower limb lymphoedema has been a valuable instrument when reviewing progress of this chronic condition.
OBJECTIVE: To establish the intrarater reliability of lower limb circumference measures in a sample of individuals who are diagnosed with lower limb lymphoedema and to evaluate if change in limb position has an effect on the reliability of circumferential measures. METHOD: A sample of forty-one adults diagnosed with a lower limb lymphoedema were recruited. Participants had their affected leg measured three times by a qualified therapist during a standard outpatient appointment: twice in a lying position and once in sitting with knee flexed at 90°. To examine the intrarater reliability, interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confident intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Excellent intrarater reliability was established at each measurement point and for the sum of circumferential measures when the limb remeasured in the same position by the same therapist. Changing the position of the limb resulted in lower intrarater reliability values at 10 and 30 cm from the base of the foot. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides evidence for the intrarater reliability of lower limb circumference measures and highlights the need for consistency when remeasuring and monitoring the limb of those diagnosed with lower limb lymphoedema. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Lymphoedema is a significant problem for breast cancer survivors but also provides lifetime risk to all survivors of lymph node surgery for solid tumours. The monitoring and surveillance of leg circumference measures of people diagnosed with lower limb lymphoedema has been a valuable instrument when reviewing progress of this chronic condition.