| Literature DB >> 33089351 |
Mirka Macel1,2, Isabella G S Visschers1, Janny L Peters3, Nicole M van Dam1,4,5, Rob M de Graaf6.
Abstract
The cuticular wax layer can be important for plant resistance to insects. Thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis) damage was assessed on 11 pepper accessions of Capsicum annuum and C. chinense in leaf disc and whole plant assays. Thrips damage differed among the accessions. We analyzed the composition of leaf cuticular waxes of these accessions by GC-MS. The leaf wax composition was different between the two Capsicum species. In C. annuum, 1-octacosanol (C28 alcohol) was the most abundant component, whereas in C. chinense 1-triacotanol (C30 alcohol) was the prominent. Thrips susceptible accessions had significantly higher concentrations of C25-C29 n-alkanes and iso-alkanes compared to relatively resistant pepper accessions. The triterpenoids α- and ß-amyrin tended to be more abundant in resistant accessions. Our study suggests a role for very long chain wax alkanes in thrips susceptibility of pepper.Entities:
Keywords: Alkanes; Capsicum; Plant defense; Resistance; Thrips; Triterpenoid; Wax metabolites
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33089351 PMCID: PMC7677282 DOI: 10.1007/s10886-020-01226-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Chem Ecol ISSN: 0098-0331 Impact factor: 2.626
Thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis) preference (damage % in choice assay) and performance (numbers of larvae and adults) on Capsicum annuum and Capsicum chinense accessions in different tests (data of the leaf disc choice test from Macel et al. 2019, data of the leaf disc no-choice test from Visschers et al. 2019a)
| Means | Means | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scale | Test | Trait | 14-S | 34-S | 43-S | 52-S | 19-R | 23-R | 63-R | 38-S | 13-R | 41-R | 70-R | |
| Leaf disc | Choice | Damage (%) | 13.9 | 13.9 | 18.3 | 20.6 | 4.6 | 5.8 | 1.9 | 9.8 | 4.5 | 2.8 | 4.1 | <0.001 |
| No-choice | Damage (mm2) | 9.4 | 6.5 | 19.7 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 1 | 7.3 | 23.2 | 5.0 | 26.1 | <0.001 | |
| Whole plant | No-choice | Damage (level 1- 9) | 5.5 | 5.7 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 4.2 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 7.8 | 7.5 | 8.0 | 8.2 | <0.001 |
| Larvae | 73 | 75 | 441 | 204 | 283 | 30 | 74 | 7 | 23 | 16 | 5 | < 0.001 | ||
| Adults | 92 | 30 | 122 | 172 | 44 | 40 | 47 | 9 | 19 | 7 | 7 | < 0.001 | ||
RU accessions numbers are given, R indicates an accession classified as resistant, S susceptible as determined in Macel et al. 2019. Damage levels at the whole plant tests range from 1 (severe damage) to 9 (no damage). P-values of Friedman-ANOVA (leaf disc choice test) and ANOVA (no-choice tests: damage mm2, larvae and adults) or Kruskal-Wallis (no-choice test: damage level) for differences among accessions
Mean concentrations of cuticular wax compounds in µg/dm2 (± SE) of leaves of thrips resistant and susceptible Capsicum accessions
| Compound Class | Compound | Formula | Rt | Resistant ( | Susceptible ( | Resistant ( | Susceptible ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tropane alkaloids | Tropacocaine | C15H19NO2 | 9.73 | 0.21 (0.09) | 0.03 (0.02) | 0.18 | 0 | 0 | n.a. |
| Pentacosane | C25H52 | 18.14 | 0.03 (0.02) | 0.24 (0.07) | 0 | 0 | n.a. | ||
| Hexacosane | C26H54 | 20.19 | 0.02 (0.01) | 0.44 (0.09) | 0.01 (0.01) | 0 | 0.83 | ||
| Heptacosane | C27H56 | 22.33 | 4.35 (0.91) | 23.43 (2.87) | 3.40 (1.30) | 0.58 (0.44) | 0.052 | ||
| Octacosane | C28H58 | 24.42 | 0.44 (0.12) | 1.54 (0.22) | 0.40 (0.15) | 0.05 (0.05) | 0.11 | ||
| Nonacosane | C29H60 | 26.53 | 4.40 (0.53) | 10.41 (0.83) | 4.32 (1.15) | 2.52 (1.55) | 0.052 | ||
| Triacotane | C30H62 | 28.58 | 0.46 (0.06) | 0.64 (0.09) | 0.43 | 0.24 (0.05) | 0.57 (0.42) | 0.74 | |
| Hentriacotane | C31H64 | 30.65 | 13.91 (1.28) | 17.46 (2.46) | 0.89 | 12.33 (3.00) | 11.36 (4.65) | 0.66 | |
| Dotriacotane | C32H66 | 32.62 | 2.83 (0.36) | 2.27 (0.55) | 0.13 | 1.84 (0.46) | 1.29 (0.38) | 0.69 | |
| Tritriacotane | C33H68 | 34.61 | 23.23 (3.51) | 28.06 (5.71) | 0.61 | 12.20 (3.33) | 11.76 (3.67) | 0.91 | |
| Tetratriacotane | C34H70 | 36.47 | 1.05 (0.22) | 1.23 (0.33) | 0.47 | 0.12 (0.04) | 0.29 (0.08) | 0.090 | |
| Pentatriacotane | C35H72 | 38.35 | 5.49 (1.43) | 11.32 (2.52) | 0.26 | 0.98 (0.44) | 2.85 (0.98) | ||
| Heptatriacotane | C37H76 | 41.92 | 0.46 (0.08) | 0.18 (0.04) | 0.06 (0.05) | 0.32 (0.11) | |||
| C29H60 | 25.72 | 0.08 (0.04) | 2.14 (0.23) | 0 | 0 | n.a. | |||
| C31H64 | 29.86 | 0.86 (0.19) | 2.41 (0.30) | 0.57 (0.19) | 0.29 (0.18) | 0.11 | |||
| C33H68 | 33.86 | 2.71 (0.36) | 5.56 (0.87) | 3.81 (1.03) | 1.92 (0.84) | 0.22 | |||
| C35H72 | 37.64 | 0.46 (0.11) | 1.70 (0.29) | 0.25 (0.14) | 0.24 (0.12) | 0.58 | |||
| C36H74 | 39.70 | 0.03 (0.01) | 0.26 (0.06) | 0.18 (0.10) | 0.19 (0.13) | 0.99 | |||
| C37H76 | 41.25 | 0.01 (0.01) | 0.18 (0.04) | 0 | 0.02 (0.02) | 0.58 | |||
other branched alkanes long-chain alcohols | branched alkane | C32H66 | 32.11 | 0.38 (0.13) | 0.57 (0.11) | 0.17 | 0.26 (0.08) | 0.27 (0.12) | 0.83 |
| branched alkane | 36.77 | 0.05 (0.03) | 0.19 (0.07) | 0.15 | 0.04 (0.02) | 0.08 (0.03) | 0.22 | ||
| 1-hexacosanol | C26H54O | 27.58 | 0.41 (0.16) | 1.25 (0.35) | 0 | 0 | n.a. | ||
| 1-heptacosanol | C27H56O | 29.62 | 0.06 (0.03) | 0.33 (0.11) | 0.14 | 0 | 0 | n.a. | |
| 1-octacosanol | C28H58O | 31.70 | 50.88 (11.7) | 83.25 (20.7) | 0.73 | 14.51 (5.65) | 30.47 (9.23) | 0.18 | |
| 1-nonacosanol | C29H60O | 33.57 | 2.96 (0.67) | 6.16 (1.55) | 0.20 | 3.70 (1.47) | 4.44 (1.15) | 0.22 | |
| 1-triacotanol | C30H62O | 35.53 | 22.64 (4.91) | 40.91 (7.79) | 0.21 | 86.61 (30.2) | 82.19 (28.8) | 0.74 | |
| 1-henatriacotanol | C31H64O | 37.31 | 0.16 (0.06) | 0.39 (0.15) | 0.65 | 1.65 (0.57) | 0.74 (0.17) | 0.83 | |
| 1-dotriacontanol | C32H66O | 39.15 | 0.36 (0.14) | 1.36 (0.82) | 0.47 | 12.90 (4.21) | 9.06 (3.01) | 0.91 | |
Esters triterpenoids | alkyl ester | 32.92 | 0.09 (0.06) | 0.96 (0.33) | 0 | 0.03 (0.02) | 0.22 | ||
| Stigmasterol | C29H48O | 34.26 | 0.09 (0.04) | 0.12 (0.05) | 0.63 | 0.12 (0.04) | 0.29 (0.08) | 0.38 | |
| ß-sitosterol | C29H50O | 35.33 | 5.98 (1.26) | 10.56 (2.64) | 0.29 | 2.44 (0.93) | 0.48 (0.29) | 0.069 | |
| Triterpenoid | 35.69 | 1.60 (0.51) | 3.64 (0.91) | 0 | 0 | n.a. | |||
| ß | C30H50O | 36.0 | 4.90 (1.07) | 3.13 (0.55) | 0.19 | 3.44 (1.11) | 0.20 (0.09) | ||
| α-amyrin | C30H50O | 36.19 | 3.05 (0.73) | 1.68 (0.60) | 1.86 (0.90) | 1.61 (0.39) | 0.38 | ||
| Triterpenoid | 37.88 | 0.44 (0.27) | 0.22 (0.09) | 0.39 | 0 | 0.03 (0.03) | 0.58 | ||
| Total | total wax | 155.49 (22.86) | 282.86 (41.36) | 0.040 | 168.43 (53.70) | 164.37 (52.39) | 0.66 | ||
C. annuum, three resistant and four susceptible accessions; C. chinense, three resistant and one susceptible accession. n = total number of individual plants used for analyses. Rt = retention time. P-values of Mann-Whitney U-tests of differences between resistant and susceptible plants within each Capsicum species, with correction for multiple comparisons (FDR, P < 0.014 significant, indicated in bold). Marginally significant P values (P < 0.05) are in italics
Fig. 1Principal component analysis plot of the relative abundance of 35 epicuticular leaf wax metabolites of Capsicum annuum (red dots) and Capsicum chinense (blue dots). The dots represent individual plant samples