| Literature DB >> 33088904 |
Benjamin Schmeusser1, Christina Borchers1, Jeffrey B Travers1,2,3, Samia Borchers2, Julian Trevino2, Max Rubin2, Heidi Donnelly2, Karl Kellawan2, Lydia Carpenter2, Shalini Bahl2, Craig Rohan2, Elizabeth Muennich2, Scott Guenthner4, Holly Hahn2, Ali Rkein2, Marc Darst5, Nico Mousdicas6, Elizabeth Cates1, Ulas Sunar7, Trevor Bihl1,7.
Abstract
We investigated the variations in physician evaluation of skin photodamage based on a published photodamage scale. Of interest is the utility of a 10-level scale ranging from none and mild photodamage to actinic keratosis (AK). The dorsal forearms of 55 adult subjects with various amounts of photodamage were considered. Each forearm was independently evaluated by 15 board-certified dermatologists according to the Global Assessment Severity Scale ranging from 0 (less severe) to 9 (the most progressed stage of skin damage). Dermatologists rated the levels of photodamage based upon the photographs in blinded fashion. Results show substantial disagreement amongst the dermatologists on the severity of photodamage. Our results indicate that ratings could be more consistent if using a scale of less levels (5-levels or 3-levels). Ultimately, clinicians can use this knowledge to provide better interpretation of inter-rater evaluations and provide more reliable assessment and frequent monitoring of high-risk populations.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33088904 PMCID: PMC7575200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Investig Dermatol ISSN: 2373-1044