Literature DB >> 33085861

Anti-Siglec-8 Antibody for Eosinophilic Gastritis and Duodenitis.

Evan S Dellon1, Kathryn A Peterson1, Joseph A Murray1, Gary W Falk1, Nirmala Gonsalves1, Mirna Chehade1, Robert M Genta1, John Leung1, Paneez Khoury1, Amy D Klion1, Sabine Hazan1, Michael Vaezi1, Adam C Bledsoe1, Sandy R Durrani1, Chao Wang1, Camilla Shaw1, Alan T Chang1, Bhupinder Singh1, Amol P Kamboj1, Henrik S Rasmussen1, Marc E Rothenberg1, Ikuo Hirano1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic gastritis and duodenitis are characterized by gastrointestinal mucosal eosinophilia, chronic symptoms, impaired quality of life, and a lack of adequate treatments. Mast-cell activity may contribute to the pathogenesis of the conditions. AK002 (lirentelimab) is an anti-Siglec-8 antibody that depletes eosinophils and inhibits mast cells and that has shown potential in animal models as a treatment for eosinophilic gastritis and duodenitis.
METHODS: In this phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned adults who had symptomatic eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic duodenitis, or both conditions in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive four monthly infusions of low-dose AK002, high-dose AK002, or placebo. The primary end point was the change in gastrointestinal eosinophil count from baseline to 2 weeks after the final dose; to maximize statistical power, we evaluated this end point in the placebo group as compared with the combined AK002 group. Secondary end points were treatment response (>30% reduction in total symptom score and >75% reduction in gastrointestinal eosinophil count) and the change in total symptom score.
RESULTS: Of the 65 patients who underwent randomization, 43 were assigned to receive AK002 and 22 were assigned to receive placebo. The mean percentage change in gastrointestinal eosinophil count was -86% in the combined AK002 group, as compared with 9% in the placebo group (least-squares mean difference, -98 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -121 to -76; P<0.001). Treatment response occurred in 63% of the patients who received AK002 and in 5% of the patients who received placebo (difference, 58 percentage points; 95% CI, 36 to 74; P<0.001). The mean change in total symptom score was -48% with AK002 and -22% with placebo (least-squares mean difference, -26 percentage points; 95% CI, -44 to -9; P = 0.004). Adverse events associated with AK002 were similar to those with placebo, with the exception of higher percentages of patients having mild-to-moderate infusion-related reactions with AK002 (60% in the combined AK002 group and 23% in the placebo group).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with eosinophilic gastritis or duodenitis, AK002 reduced gastrointestinal eosinophils and symptoms. Infusion-related reactions were more common with AK002 than with placebo. (Funded by Allakos; ENIGMA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03496571.).
Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33085861      PMCID: PMC7600443          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2012047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  33 in total

1.  A shift in the clinical spectrum of eosinophilic gastroenteritis toward the mucosal disease type.

Authors:  Joseph Y Chang; Rok Seon Choung; Ru Min Lee; G Richard Locke; Cathy D Schleck; Alan R Zinsmeister; Thomas C Smyrk; Nicholas J Talley
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  Involvement of mast cells in eosinophilic esophagitis.

Authors:  J Pablo Abonia; Carine Blanchard; Bridget Buckmeier Butz; Heather F Rainey; Margaret H Collins; Keith Stringer; Philip E Putnam; Marc E Rothenberg
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  Reactions to Rituximab in an Outpatient Infusion Center: A 5-Year Review.

Authors:  Amy S Levin; Iris M Otani; Timothy Lax; Ephraim Hochberg; Aleena Banerji
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2016-08-03

4.  Eosinophilic gastroenteritis: a clinicopathological study of patients with disease of the mucosa, muscle layer, and subserosal tissues.

Authors:  N J Talley; R G Shorter; S F Phillips; A R Zinsmeister
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases beyond eosinophilic esophagitis.

Authors:  Maureen Egan; Glenn T Furuta
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 6.347

6.  AK002, a Humanized Sialic Acid-Binding Immunoglobulin-Like Lectin-8 Antibody that Induces Antibody-Dependent Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity against Human Eosinophils and Inhibits Mast Cell-Mediated Anaphylaxis in Mice.

Authors:  Bradford A Youngblood; Emily C Brock; John Leung; Rustom Falahati; Paul J Bryce; Jessica Bright; Jason Williams; Leonard D Shultz; Dale L Greiner; Michael A Brehm; Christopher Bebbington; Nenad Tomasevic
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.749

Review 7.  Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders.

Authors:  Nirmala Gonsalves
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 8.667

8.  Mast cells in gastrointestinal disease.

Authors:  David B Ramsay; Sindu Stephen; Marie Borum; Lysandra Voltaggio; David B Doman
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2010-12

Review 9.  Evaluation of the patient with suspected eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease.

Authors:  David M Fleischer; Dan Atkins
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.479

10.  Individuals affected by eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders have complex unmet needs and frequently experience unique barriers to care.

Authors:  Girish Hiremath; Ellyn Kodroff; Mary J Strobel; Melissa Scott; Wendy Book; Cathy Reidy; Shay Kyle; Denise Mack; Kathleen Sable; Pablo Abonia; Jonathan Spergel; Sandeep K Gupta; T Glenn Furuta; Marc E Rothenberg; Evan S Dellon
Journal:  Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 2.947

View more
  42 in total

1.  Older patients with eosinophilic esophagitis have high treatment response to topical steroids.

Authors:  Corey J Ketchem; Kisan P Thakkar; Angela Xue; Sumana Reddy; Lior Abramson; Sydney B Greenberg; Sonia Abichandani; Talya L Miller; Nicole C Chang; Swathi Eluri; Craig C Reed; Evan S Dellon
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 4.088

2.  Determination of Biopsy Yield That Optimally Detects Eosinophilic Gastritis and/or Duodenitis in a Randomized Trial of Lirentelimab.

Authors:  Evan S Dellon; Nirmala Gonsalves; Marc E Rothenberg; Ikuo Hirano; Mirna Chehade; Kathryn A Peterson; Gary W Falk; Joseph A Murray; Lauren T Gehman; Alan T Chang; Bhupinder Singh; Henrik S Rasmussen; Robert M Genta
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Induction of the endogenous sialoglycan ligand for eosinophil death receptor Siglec-8 in chronic rhinosinusitis with hyperplastic nasal polyposis.

Authors:  Hyun Sil Lee; Anabel Gonzalez-Gil; Virginia Drake; T August Li; Ronald L Schnaar; Jean Kim
Journal:  Glycobiology       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 4.313

4.  Eosinophil Knockout Humans: Uncovering the Role of Eosinophils Through Eosinophil-Directed Biological Therapies.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Jacobsen; David J Jackson; Enrico Heffler; Sameer K Mathur; Albert J Bredenoord; Ian D Pavord; Praveen Akuthota; Florence Roufosse; Marc E Rothenberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 28.527

Review 5.  Eosinophils in the Field of Nasal Polyposis: Towards a Better Understanding of Biologic Therapies.

Authors:  Thibault Vanderhaegen; Isabelle Gengler; Arnaud Dendooven; Cecile Chenivesse; Guillaume Lefèvre; Geoffrey Mortuaire
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 6.  Emerging Role of Phospholipase-Derived Cleavage Products in Regulating Eosinophil Activity: Focus on Lysophospholipids, Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Eicosanoids.

Authors:  Eva Knuplez; Eva Maria Sturm; Gunther Marsche
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Role of Short Chain Fatty Acids and Apolipoproteins in the Regulation of Eosinophilia-Associated Diseases.

Authors:  Eva Maria Sturm; Eva Knuplez; Gunther Marsche
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Impressions and aspirations from the FDA GREAT VI Workshop on Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders Beyond Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Perspectives for Progress in the Field.

Authors:  Marc E Rothenberg; Shawna K B Hottinger; Nirmala Gonsalves; Glenn T Furuta; Margaret H Collins; Nicholas J Talley; Kathryn Peterson; Calies Menard-Katcher; Macie Smith; Ikuo Hirano; Robert M Genta; Mirna Chehade; Sandeep K Gupta; Jonathan M Spergel; Seema S Aceves; Evan S Dellon
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  Siglecs-7/9 function as inhibitory immune checkpoints in vivo and can be targeted to enhance therapeutic antitumor immunity.

Authors:  Itziar Ibarlucea-Benitez; Polina Weitzenfeld; Patrick Smith; Jeffrey V Ravetch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Diagnosis of Pediatric Non-Esophageal Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders by Eosinophil Peroxidase Immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Shaina H Hasan; Steve Taylor; Shipra Garg; Matthew R Buras; Alfred D Doyle; Cindy S Bauer; Benjamin L Wright; Shauna Schroeder
Journal:  Pediatr Dev Pathol       Date:  2021-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.