Literature DB >> 33085816

Fake news and fake research: Why meta-research matters more than ever.

Richard G McGee1,2, Amanda C Dawson1,3.   

Abstract

Research is in a crisis of credibility, and this is to the peril of all paediatricians. Billions of dollars are being wasted each year because research is not planned, badly conducted or poorly reported, and this is on a background of rapidly reducing research budgets. How can paediatricians, families and patients make informed treatment choices if the evidence base is absent or not trustworthy? This article discusses why meta-research now matters more than ever, how it can help solve this crisis of credibility and how this should lead to more efficient and effective clinical care. The field of meta-research or research-on-research is the ultimate big picture approach to identifying and solving issues of bias, error, misconduct and waste in research. Meta-researchers value authenticity over aesthetics and quality over quantity. The utility of meta-research does not rely on accusations or critical assessments of individual research, but through highlighting where and how the scientific method and research standards across all fields can be improved. Meta-researchers study, analyse and critique the research pathway, focusing on elements such as methods (how to conduct), evaluation (how to test), reporting (how to communicate), reproducibility (how to verify) and incentives (how to reward). In the current climate it is now more critical than ever that we make use of meta-research and prioritise high-quality high-impact research, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Paediatrics and Child Health Division (The Royal Australasian College of Physicians).

Entities:  

Keywords:  evidence-based medicine; meta-research; research method; scientific method

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33085816      PMCID: PMC7821256          DOI: 10.1111/jpc.15237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health        ISSN: 1034-4810            Impact factor:   1.954


  45 in total

1.  Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  Lesley Wood; Matthias Egger; Lise Lotte Gluud; Kenneth F Schulz; Peter Jüni; Douglas G Altman; Christian Gluud; Richard M Martin; Anthony J G Wood; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-03-03

2.  Discontinuation and Nonpublication of Randomized Clinical Trials Conducted in Children.

Authors:  Natalie Pica; Florence Bourgeois
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Primary Outcomes Reporting in Trials (PORTal): a systematic review of inadequate reporting in pediatric randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Zafira Bhaloo; Denise Adams; Yali Liu; Namrata Hansraj; Lisa Hartling; Caroline B Terwee; Sunita Vohra
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Reporting guidelines of health research studies are frequently used inappropriately.

Authors:  Lisa Caulley; Ferrán Catalá-López; Jonathan Whelan; Michel Khoury; Jennifer Ferraro; Wei Cheng; Don Husereau; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  The Conduct and Reporting of Child Health Research: An Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2012 and Evaluation of Change over 5 Years.

Authors:  Allison Gates; Lisa Hartling; Ben Vandermeer; Patrina Caldwell; Despina G Contopoulos-Ioannidis; Sarah Curtis; Ricardo M Fernandes; Terry P Klassen; Katrina Williams; Michele P Dyson
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Waste in covid-19 research.

Authors:  Paul P Glasziou; Sharon Sanders; Tammy Hoffmann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-05-12

7.  Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers.

Authors:  David Moher
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Reporting of data monitoring committees and adverse events in paediatric trials: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Allison Gates; Patrina Caldwell; Sarah Curtis; Leonila Dans; Ricardo M Fernandes; Lisa Hartling; Lauren E Kelly; Ben Vandermeer; Katrina Williams; Kerry Woolfall; Michele P Dyson
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2019-03-20

Review 9.  Randomized controlled trials in pediatric critical care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Mark Duffett; Karen Choong; Lisa Hartling; Kusum Menon; Lehana Thabane; Deborah J Cook
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal Cognition.

Authors:  Tom E Hardwicke; Maya B Mathur; Kyle MacDonald; Gustav Nilsonne; George C Banks; Mallory C Kidwell; Alicia Hofelich Mohr; Elizabeth Clayton; Erica J Yoon; Michael Henry Tessler; Richie L Lenne; Sara Altman; Bria Long; Michael C Frank
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.