Xuesong Bai1, Xiao Zhang1, Wuyang Yang2, Yinhang Zhang1, Tao Wang1, Ran Xu1, Yan Wang3, Long Li1, Yao Feng1, Kun Yang4, Xue Wang5, Haiqing Song6, Qingfeng Ma6, Liqun Jiao7,8. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. China Medical University, No.77 Puhe Road, Shenyang North New Area, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China. 4. Department of Evidence-Based Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 5. Medical Library, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 6. Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 7. Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. liqunjiao@126.com. 8. Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. liqunjiao@126.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis summarized the current literature to compare the safety and efficacy between first-pass effect (FPE) and multiple-pass effect (MPE) for thrombectomy in treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). METHODS: Major databases were searched for studies which reported clinical outcomes regarding successful or complete recanalization after first pass of mechanical thrombectomy in AIS. The assessment of bias was performed using different scales. I2 statistic was used to evaluate heterogeneity between reviewers. Subgroup, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity. Visualization of funnel plots was used to evaluate publication bias. RESULTS: A total of 9 studies were eligible for final analysis. For successful recanalization (mTICI 2b-3), favorable outcomes were seen in 49.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 40.5-58.9%) and 34.7% (95% CI: 26.8-42.7%) of FPE and MPE patients, respectively. Mortality at 3 months was 13.8% (95% CI: 10.8-16.9%) and 26.0% (95% CI: 17.7-34.2%), respectively. For complete recanalization (mTICI 2c-3), proportion of favorable outcomes were 62.7% (95% CI: 51.2-74.2%) and 47.7% (95% CI: 37.4-58.0%) in FPE and MPE; mortality was seen in 11.5% (95% CI: 4.9-18.2%) and 17.0% (95% CI: 5.2-28.7%), respectively. For AIS with successful recanalization, FPE had more favorable outcome (odds ratio (OR): 1.85, 95% CI: 1.48-2.30; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%) and lower mortality than MPE (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.42-0.79; p = 0.001; I2 = 61.9%). Similar results were seen in a subgroup analysis of patients with complete recanalization, with FPE having better outcome (OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.40-2.28; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%) and lower mortality risk (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.44-0.86; p = 0.005; I2 = 0%) compared to MPE. CONCLUSION: FPE is associated with better outcomes than MPE after achieving successful or complete recanalization.
PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis summarized the current literature to compare the safety and efficacy between first-pass effect (FPE) and multiple-pass effect (MPE) for thrombectomy in treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). METHODS: Major databases were searched for studies which reported clinical outcomes regarding successful or complete recanalization after first pass of mechanical thrombectomy in AIS. The assessment of bias was performed using different scales. I2 statistic was used to evaluate heterogeneity between reviewers. Subgroup, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity. Visualization of funnel plots was used to evaluate publication bias. RESULTS: A total of 9 studies were eligible for final analysis. For successful recanalization (mTICI 2b-3), favorable outcomes were seen in 49.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 40.5-58.9%) and 34.7% (95% CI: 26.8-42.7%) of FPE and MPE patients, respectively. Mortality at 3 months was 13.8% (95% CI: 10.8-16.9%) and 26.0% (95% CI: 17.7-34.2%), respectively. For complete recanalization (mTICI 2c-3), proportion of favorable outcomes were 62.7% (95% CI: 51.2-74.2%) and 47.7% (95% CI: 37.4-58.0%) in FPE and MPE; mortality was seen in 11.5% (95% CI: 4.9-18.2%) and 17.0% (95% CI: 5.2-28.7%), respectively. For AIS with successful recanalization, FPE had more favorable outcome (odds ratio (OR): 1.85, 95% CI: 1.48-2.30; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%) and lower mortality than MPE (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.42-0.79; p = 0.001; I2 = 61.9%). Similar results were seen in a subgroup analysis of patients with complete recanalization, with FPE having better outcome (OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.40-2.28; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%) and lower mortality risk (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.44-0.86; p = 0.005; I2 = 0%) compared to MPE. CONCLUSION: FPE is associated with better outcomes than MPE after achieving successful or complete recanalization.
Authors: Véronique L Roger; Alan S Go; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; William B Borden; Dawn M Bravata; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Diane M Makuc; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Claudia S Moy; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Elsayed Z Soliman; Paul D Sorlie; Nona Sotoodehnia; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gregory W Albers; Michael P Marks; Stephanie Kemp; Soren Christensen; Jenny P Tsai; Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez; Ryan A McTaggart; Michel T Torbey; May Kim-Tenser; Thabele Leslie-Mazwi; Amrou Sarraj; Scott E Kasner; Sameer A Ansari; Sharon D Yeatts; Scott Hamilton; Michael Mlynash; Jeremy J Heit; Greg Zaharchuk; Sun Kim; Janice Carrozzella; Yuko Y Palesch; Andrew M Demchuk; Roland Bammer; Philip W Lavori; Joseph P Broderick; Maarten G Lansberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William J Powers; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Teri Ackerson; Opeolu M Adeoye; Nicholas C Bambakidis; Kyra Becker; José Biller; Michael Brown; Bart M Demaerschalk; Brian Hoh; Edward C Jauch; Chelsea S Kidwell; Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi; Bruce Ovbiagele; Phillip A Scott; Kevin N Sheth; Andrew M Southerland; Deborah V Summers; David L Tirschwell Journal: Stroke Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Raul G Nogueira; Ashutosh P Jadhav; Diogo C Haussen; Alain Bonafe; Ronald F Budzik; Parita Bhuva; Dileep R Yavagal; Marc Ribo; Christophe Cognard; Ricardo A Hanel; Cathy A Sila; Ameer E Hassan; Monica Millan; Elad I Levy; Peter Mitchell; Michael Chen; Joey D English; Qaisar A Shah; Frank L Silver; Vitor M Pereira; Brijesh P Mehta; Blaise W Baxter; Michael G Abraham; Pedro Cardona; Erol Veznedaroglu; Frank R Hellinger; Lei Feng; Jawad F Kirmani; Demetrius K Lopes; Brian T Jankowitz; Michael R Frankel; Vincent Costalat; Nirav A Vora; Albert J Yoo; Amer M Malik; Anthony J Furlan; Marta Rubiera; Amin Aghaebrahim; Jean-Marc Olivot; Wondwossen G Tekle; Ryan Shields; Todd Graves; Roger J Lewis; Wade S Smith; David S Liebeskind; Jeffrey L Saver; Tudor G Jovin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-11-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mayank Goyal; Bijoy K Menon; Wim H van Zwam; Diederik W J Dippel; Peter J Mitchell; Andrew M Demchuk; Antoni Dávalos; Charles B L M Majoie; Aad van der Lugt; Maria A de Miquel; Geoffrey A Donnan; Yvo B W E M Roos; Alain Bonafe; Reza Jahan; Hans-Christoph Diener; Lucie A van den Berg; Elad I Levy; Olvert A Berkhemer; Vitor M Pereira; Jeremy Rempel; Mònica Millán; Stephen M Davis; Daniel Roy; John Thornton; Luis San Román; Marc Ribó; Debbie Beumer; Bruce Stouch; Scott Brown; Bruce C V Campbell; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Jeffrey L Saver; Michael D Hill; Tudor G Jovin Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Tudor G Jovin; Angel Chamorro; Erik Cobo; María A de Miquel; Carlos A Molina; Alex Rovira; Luis San Román; Joaquín Serena; Sonia Abilleira; Marc Ribó; Mònica Millán; Xabier Urra; Pere Cardona; Elena López-Cancio; Alejandro Tomasello; Carlos Castaño; Jordi Blasco; Lucía Aja; Laura Dorado; Helena Quesada; Marta Rubiera; María Hernandez-Pérez; Mayank Goyal; Andrew M Demchuk; Rüdiger von Kummer; Miquel Gallofré; Antoni Dávalos Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Osama O Zaidat; Alicia C Castonguay; Italo Linfante; Rishi Gupta; Coleman O Martin; William E Holloway; Nils Mueller-Kronast; Joey D English; Guilherme Dabus; Tim W Malisch; Franklin A Marden; Hormozd Bozorgchami; Andrew Xavier; Ansaar T Rai; Michael T Froehler; Aamir Badruddin; Thanh N Nguyen; M Asif Taqi; Michael G Abraham; Albert J Yoo; Vallabh Janardhan; Hashem Shaltoni; Roberta Novakovic; Alex Abou-Chebl; Peng R Chen; Gavin W Britz; Chung-Huan J Sun; Vibhav Bansal; Ritesh Kaushal; Ashish Nanda; Raul G Nogueira Journal: Stroke Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Hisham Salahuddin; Rahul R Rao; Syed F Zaidi; Paige Prologo-Richardson; Fatima Khalid; Linda Saju; Muhammad Asif Taqi; Richard R Burgess; Mouhammad A Jumaa Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Eva González Diaz; Carlos Rodríguez-Paz; Andres Fernandez-Prieto; Mario Martínez-Galdámez; Rosa Martínez-Moreno; Joaquín Ortega Quintanilla; Alejandro Tomasello; Joaquín Zamarro; David Liebeskind; Osama O Zaidat; Nils H Mueller-Kronast Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 3.006