Literature DB >> 33083863

Low-dose ruxolitinib shows effective in treating myelofibrosis.

Yunfan Yang1, Hongmei Luo1, Yuhuan Zheng1, Zhongqing Zou1, Ting Niu1, Yongqian Jia1, Huanling Zhu1, Ting Liu1, Yu Wu1, Hong Chang1, Jie Ji1, Jian Li1, Ling Pan2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of low-dose ruxolitinib (daily dose ≤ 10 mg) for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF). A retrospective analysis was performed on a total of 88 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated MF (MPN-MF) who were diagnosed and treated in West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China. A total of 44 MPN-MF patients received a low dose of ruxolitinib (daily dose ≤ 10 mg), while another 44 patients received 10-25 mg twice daily. Low-dose ruxolitinib treatment resulted in slow, but gradual spleen response. Compared with baseline, the mean changes in palpable spleen length in the low- and high-dose groups were -26.9 and -49.0% after 12 weeks of treatment, respectively, and -46.7 and -64.1% after 48 weeks of treatment, respectively. In the low dose group, the median myeloproliferative neoplasm symptom assessment form (MPN-SAF) total symptom score (TSS) decreased by 37.8 and 35.9% at the 12 weeks and 48 weeks after treatment, respectively. No statistical difference was observed in MPN-SAF TSS among different dose groups. After 48 weeks of treatment, bone marrow (BM) fibrosis improved in 43.3% (13/30) of evaluated patients and was stable in 56.7% (17/30) patients. In the low-dose treated group, BM fibrosis improved in 50% patients and was stable in remaining 50%. Low-dose ruxolitinib is effective in treating MF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone marrow fibrosis; Dose; Myelofibrosis; Ruxolitinib; Splenomegaly

Year:  2020        PMID: 33083863     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-020-04311-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  19 in total

1.  MPN-associated myelofibrosis (MPN-MF).

Authors:  R A Mesa; A Green; G Barosi; S Verstovsek; J Vardiman; R P Gale
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.156

2.  Three-year efficacy, safety, and survival findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study comparing ruxolitinib with best available therapy for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Francisco Cervantes; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali; Andres Sirulnik; Viktoriya Stalbovskaya; Mari McQuitty; Deborah S Hunter; Richard S Levy; Francesco Passamonti; Tiziano Barbui; Giovanni Barosi; Claire N Harrison; Laurent Knoops; Heinz Gisslinger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Molecular aspects of myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  François Delhommeau; Dorota Jeziorowska; Christophe Marzac; Nicole Casadevall
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Clinical and laboratory features of myelofibrosis and limitations of current therapies.

Authors:  Stephanie A Gregory; Ruben A Mesa; Ronald Hoffman; Jamile M Shammo
Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol       Date:  2011-09

5.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Srdan Verstovsek; Ruben A Mesa; Jason Gotlib; Richard S Levy; Vikas Gupta; John F DiPersio; John V Catalano; Michael Deininger; Carole Miller; Richard T Silver; Moshe Talpaz; Elliott F Winton; Jimmie H Harvey; Murat O Arcasoy; Elizabeth Hexner; Roger M Lyons; Ronald Paquette; Azra Raza; Kris Vaddi; Susan Erickson-Viitanen; Iphigenia L Koumenis; William Sun; Victor Sandor; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Claire Harrison; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali; Heinz Gisslinger; Roger Waltzman; Viktoriya Stalbovskaya; Mari McQuitty; Deborah S Hunter; Richard Levy; Laurent Knoops; Francisco Cervantes; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Tiziano Barbui; Giovanni Barosi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment.

Authors:  Francisco Cervantes; Brigitte Dupriez; Arturo Pereira; Francesco Passamonti; John T Reilly; Enrica Morra; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Ruben A Mesa; Jean-Loup Demory; Giovanni Barosi; Elisa Rumi; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Primary myelofibrosis: update on definition, pathogenesis, and treatment.

Authors:  Omar I Abdel-Wahab; Ross L Levine
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.739

9.  Guideline for the diagnosis and management of myelofibrosis.

Authors:  John T Reilly; Mary Frances McMullin; Philip A Beer; Nauman Butt; Eibhlean Conneally; Andrew Duncombe; Anthony R Green; N George Michaeel; Marie H Gilleece; Georgina W Hall; Steven Knapper; Adam Mead; Ruben A Mesa; Mallika Sekhar; Bridget Wilkins; Claire N Harrison
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 10.  Biology and clinical management of myeloproliferative neoplasms and development of the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib.

Authors:  J Mascarenhas; T I Mughal; S Verstovsek
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  1 in total

1.  Selective suppression of melanoma lacking IFN-γ pathway by JAK inhibition depends on T cells and host TNF signaling.

Authors:  Hongxing Shen; Fengyuan Huang; Xiangmin Zhang; Oluwagbemiga A Ojo; Yuebin Li; Hoa Quang Trummell; Joshua C Anderson; John Fiveash; Markus Bredel; Eddy S Yang; Christopher D Willey; Zechen Chong; James A Bonner; Lewis Zhichang Shi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 17.694

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.