Literature DB >> 33083857

MRI following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: assessment of imaging features found with post-operative pain, arthritis, and graft failure.

Tony T Wong1, John Denning2, Matthew P Moy3, Michael J Rasiej3, Lauren H Redler4, Christopher S Ahmad4, Charles A Popkin4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess MR features following MPFL reconstruction and determine their influence on post-operative pain, progressive arthritis, or graft failure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study on 38 patients with MPFL reconstruction and a post-operative MRI between January 2010 and June 2019. Two radiologists assessed MPFL graft signal, graft thickness, femoral screw, femoral tunnel widening, and patellofemoral cartilage damage. The third performed patellofemoral instability measurements. All three assessed femoral tunnel position with final result determined by majority consensus. Imaging findings were evaluated in the setting of post-operative pain, patellofemoral arthritis, and MPFL graft failure including need for MPFL revision. Statistics included chi-square, Fisher's exact test, t test, and kappa.
RESULTS: Mean graft thickness was 6.0 ± 1.8 mm; 24% of the grafts were diffusely hypointense. Mean femoral tunnel widening was 2.5 ± 1.8 mm; 34% of the femoral screws were broken or extruded. Fifty-two percent of the patients had no interval cartilage change. Non-anatomic femoral tunnels were found in 66% of patients, including in all 9 patients requiring revision MPFL reconstruction (p = 0.013). Revised MPFL grafts had more abnormal femoral screws compared to those that did not (67% vs. 24%) (p = 0.019). Other MR features did not significantly influence the evaluated outcomes.
CONCLUSION: The need for revision MPFL reconstruction occurs more frequently when there is a non-anatomic femoral tunnel and broken or extruded femoral screws. The appearance of the MPFL graft itself is not an influencing factor for post-operative pain, progression of patellofemoral arthritis, or graft failure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Graft failure; MPFL reconstruction; MRI; Medial patellofemoral ligament; Post-operative knee

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33083857     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03655-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  3 in total

1.  Femoral tunnel placement in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark McCarthy; T J Ridley; Matthew Bollier; Brian Wolf; John Albright; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

2.  [Patella infera. Apropos of 128 cases].

Authors:  J Caton; G Deschamps; P Chambat; J L Lerat; H Dejour
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1982

Review 3.  Assessment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Maturity With Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Pieter Van Dyck; Katja Zazulia; Céline Smekens; Christiaan H W Heusdens; Thomas Janssens; Jan Sijbers
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-06-03
  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Patellar instability MRI measurements are associated with knee joint degeneration after reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament.

Authors:  Paula Giesler; Frederic A Baumann; Dominik Weidlich; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Matthias Jung; Christian Holwein; Julia Schneider; Alexandra S Gersing; Andreas B Imhoff; Fabian Bamberg; Pia M Jungmann
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-07-04       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Increased tibial tubercle-trochlear groove and patellar height indicate a higher risk of recurrent patellar dislocation following medial reefing.

Authors:  Marc-Daniel Ahrend; Tobias Eisenmann; Moritz Herbst; Boyko Gueorguiev; Gabriel Keller; Florian Schmidutz; Stefan Döbele; Steffen Schröter; Christoph Ihle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.342

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.