| Literature DB >> 33083631 |
Oscar Otero-Marquez1, Gerardo Ledesma-Gil1, Sharmina Alauddin1, R Theodore Smith1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe novel anatomic findings of an apparent choroidal macrovessel, originally misdiagnosed as a choroidal tumor, using non-invasive imaging tools. OBSERVATIONS: Initial ophthalmic examination revealed an elevated hypopigmented choroidal mass in the macular area, with a serpentine track extending temporally to the equator. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) revealed an optically hollow lesion just outside the choroid-scleral junction (CSJ), indenting the retina and compressing the choroid from the scleral side. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) at the choroidal level showed relative low flow within the lesion. En face OCT at the level of the choroid demonstrated similar reflectivity to the physiological adjacent choroidal vessels. CONCLUSION AND IMPORTANCE: Non-invasive imaging can be used to demonstrate the presence and anatomy of a choroidal macrovessel. OCTA is presented as a useful diagnostic imaging test that can distinguish this lesion from alternative diagnoses without the use of dye injection. In addition to the previously published reports of such vessels in the choroid, we suggest a possible anatomic variant infra-choroidal location of a macrovessel and hypothesize its origin.Entities:
Keywords: Choroid-scleral junction; Choroidal macrovessel; En face imaging; Optical coherence tomography; Optical coherence tomography angiography
Year: 2020 PMID: 33083631 PMCID: PMC7553882 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100871
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep ISSN: 2451-9936
Fig. 1(A) Fundus color photography revealed a tortuous, hypopigmented serpentine track originating from an elevated lesion in the macular area and extending temporally. Media opacity is due to cataract. (B) Fundus autofluorescence image showed a healthy retinal pigment epithelium along the lesion. (C) Infrared reflectance image and (D) EDI-OCT scan that crossed the lesion below the fovea and in two places temporally showed an optically hollow lesion just outside the choroid-scleral junction with an estimated measurement of 400 μm at widest girth markedly compressing the choroid from the scleral side. Looking at the lateral wall of the vessel, the choroid-scleral junction is more evident (orange arrowhead) and the location of the macrovessel, in fact, is infra-choroidal. (E) Magnified scan showed mild elevation and thickening of the overlying RPE, an intact but indented outer retina and a tapering width without any point of contact of the macrovessel (orange asterisks) with the choroid itself. The choroid-scleral junction is highlighted in dashed yellow. (F) OCTA at the choroidal level showed relative low flow within the lesion. (G) En face OCT at the choroid showed that the reflectivity of the lesion was similar to that of the physiological adjacent choroidal vessels (orange asterisk). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Features of choroidal macrovessel in patients based on a literature review.
| No. | Authors | Demographics | Clinical Features | OCT | FA | ICGA | Other findings | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | Sex | Race | Symptoms | Visual Acuity | Tessellated fundus/Peripapillary atrophy | RPE elevation | Irregular EZ | SRF | OCTA | Initial phase | Late phase | ||||
| Lima et al. | 42 | M | White | ND | 1.0 | +/+ | + | – | – | ND | ND | Normal | Hypo | ||
| Ehrles et al. | 76 | F | ND | Asymptomatic | 0.66 | +/+ | + | + | – | ND | Hyper | Hyper | ND | ||
| Choudry et al. | 42 | F | White | Metamorphopsia | ND | +/+ | + | + | – | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Pichi et al. | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | +/+ | + | + | – | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Kovach | 70s | F | White | Asymptomatic | 0.66 | +/+ | + | + | – | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Hamptom et al. | 80 | F | ND | ND | ND | +/+ | + | + | – | Low flow | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Mahroo et al. | 79 | F | ND | ND | ND | −/− | + | + | – | ND | ND | Hyper | ND | ||
| Dalvin et al. | 55 | F | White | Asymptomatic | 0.8 | −/− | + | + | + | ND | Hyper | Hyper | ND | ||
| Dalvin et al. | 68 | F | White | Blurry vision | 0.8 | +/+ | + | + | + | ND | Hyper | Hyper | ND | ||
| Casalino et al. | 65 | F | White | Asymptomatic | 1.0 | +/+ | + | + | + | Low flow | Hyper | Hyper | ND | ||
| Mori et al. | 79 | F | ND | Metamorphopsia | 0.4* | +/+ | + | + | – | Low flow | Hyper | Hyper | ND | AV connection | |
| Katakoa et al. | 39 | F | ND | Blurry vision | 1.0 | +/+ | + | + | – | ND | Hyper | Hyper | Hypo | LSFG Hyper-perfusion | |
| Otero-Marquez et al. | 69 | M | Asian | Asymptomatic | 0.2* | +/+ | + | – | – | Low flow | ND | ND | ND | ||
EZ, ellipsoid zone; F, female; FA, fluorescein angiography; hyper, hyperfluorescence; hypo, hypofluorescence; ICGA, indocyanine green angiography; LSFG, laser speckle flowgraphy; M, male; ND, no data; OCT, optical coherence tomography; OCTA optical coherence tomography angiography; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; SRF, subretinal fluid.
*Visual Acuity conditioned by cataract.