| Literature DB >> 33083464 |
Zheng Yang1, Xiaohong Li1, Jingyu Li2, Qisheng Su1, Yuling Qiu1, Zunni Zhang1, Liqian Zhang1, Wuning Mo1.
Abstract
Tubulin polymerization promoting protein family member 3 (TPPP3) is a kind of protein that can mediate the dynamics and stability of microtubules. However, the correlations of TPPP3 between prognosis and immune infiltrates in different tumors are still unclear. The analysis of TPPP3 expression was performed via Oncomine and Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) website. We also used GEPIA to assess the impact of TPPPT3 on clinical outcomes. The related pathways involved in TPPP3 were analyzed by gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA), and the correlation between TPPP3 and immune infiltration was studied by Tumor Immune Estimation Resource2.0 (TIMER 2.0). The TPPP3 expression was significantly reduced in head and neck squamous carcinoma (HNSC) compared to adjacent tissues. In addition, the low expression of TPPP3 in HNSC was significantly associated with prognosis. The pathways closely related to the low expression of TPPP3 are "Antigen Processing and Presentation," "Primary Immunodeficiency," and so on. The TPPP3 expression was negatively correlated with the level of CD8+ T cell, B cell, and myeloid dendritic cell infiltration in HNSC. The TPPP3 expression is closely related to multiple immunomarkers in CD8+ T cell and Myeloid dendritic cells. These data indicate that TPPP3 is associated with multiple cancers and involves multiple immune-related pathways, and TPPP3 is associated with immune infiltration levels. Besides, the TPPP3 expression may help regulate tumor-associated CD8 + T cells, DC cells in HNSC. We conclude TPPP3 can be considered as a biomarker for predicting head and neck squamous cell carcinoma prognosis and immune infiltration.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33083464 PMCID: PMC7563072 DOI: 10.1155/2020/3962146
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1TPPP3 expression levels in different types of human tumors. (a) In the Oncomine database, TPPP3 expression in different cancer datasets compared to normal tissues. (b) Human TPPP3 expression levels in different tumor types from Timer. BRCA (breast invasive carcinoma), CESC (cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma), CHOL (cholangiocarcinoma), COAD (colon adenocarcinoma), DLBC (Lymphoid Neoplasm Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma), ESCA (Esophageal carcinoma), GBM (Glioblastoma multiforme), HNSC (head and neck squamous cell carcinoma), KICH (kidney chromophobe), KIRC (kidney renal clear cell carcinoma), KIRP (kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma), LAML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia), LGG (Brain Lower Grade Glioma), LIHC (Liver hepatocellular carcinoma), LUAD (lung adenocarcinoma), LUSC (lung squamous cell carcinoma), MESO (Mesothelioma), OV (ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma), PAAD (Pancreatic adenocarcinoma), PCPG (Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma), PRAD (Prostate adenocarcinoma), READ (Rectum adenocarcinoma), SARC (sarcoma), SKCM (Skin Cutaneous Melanoma), STAD (Stomach adenocarcinoma), TGCT (Testicular Germ Cell Tumors), THCA (Thyroid carcinoma), THYM (Thymoma), UCEC (Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma), UCS (Uterine Carcinosarcoma), and UVM (Uveal Melanoma).
Figure 2(a–g) Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing the high and low expression of TPPP3 in different types of tumors by GEPIA. (h–y) list the most common functional gene sets enriched in HNSC samples with low and high expression of TPPP3.
Figure 3The correlation of TPPP3 expression with immune infiltration level in HNSC. TPPP3 expression is negatively correlated with infiltrating levels of CD8+ T cell, B cell, and myeloid dendritic cell. The infiltration level for each SCNA category is compared with the normal using a two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
Figure 4Scatterplots of correlations between TPPP3 expression and gene markers of CD8+T cells, B cell, and myeloid dendritic cell.
Figure 5Expression of TPPP3 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and nontumor epithelial tissue. (a) Nontumor epithelial tissue. (b) NPC tissue. (c) Analysis of TPPP3 expression levels in patients with NPC and normal tissues from GEO datasets GSE12452. p < 0.0001. (d) Analysis of TPPP3 expression levels in patients with NPC and normal tissues from GEO datasets GSE53819. p < 0.0001.
Immunohistochemical staining showed that TPPP3 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma was lower than that in normal nasopharyngeal mucosa.
| Group | Positive (+) | Negative (-) | Sum | Positive rate (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasopharyngeal carcinoma | 7 | 50 | 57 | 12.28 | <0.001 |
| Normal nasopharyngeal mucosa | 27 | 3 | 30 | 90.00 |
The relationship between the expression of TPPP3 and the clinicopathological features of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
| Group |
| Negative (-) | Positive (+) | Positive proportion (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 41 | 36 | 5 | 12.20 | >0.05 |
| Female | 16 | 14 | 2 | 12.50 | |
| Age | |||||
| ≤45 | 25 | 24 | 3 | 12.00 | >0.05 |
| >45 | 32 | 28 | 4 | 12.50 | |
| Differentiation or not | |||||
| Differentiated | 6 | 5 | 1 | 16.67 | >0.05 |
| Undifferentiated | 51 | 45 | 6 | 11.76 | |
| T stage | |||||
| T1, T2 | 21 | 19 | 2 | 9.52 | >0.05 |
| T3, T4 | 36 | 31 | 5 | 13.89 | |
| N stage | |||||
| ≥N1 | 52 | 46 | 6 | 11.54 | >0.05 |
| N0 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 20.00 | |
| M stage | |||||
| M0 | 49 | 43 | 6 | 12.24 | >0.05 |
| M1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 12.50 | |
| Clinical stage | |||||
| I, II | 5 | 4 | 1 | 20.00 | >0.05 |
| III, IV | 52 | 46 | 6 | 11.54 |