| Literature DB >> 33082545 |
Carolina Bebi1, Matteo Turetti1, Elena Lievore1, Francesco Ripa1, Marco Bilato1, Lorenzo Rocchini1, Andrea Gallioli1, Matteo Giulio Spinelli1, Elisa De Lorenzis1,2, Giancarlo Albo1,2, Fabrizio Longo1, Franco Gadda1, Paolo Guido Dell'Orto1, Emanuele Montanari1,2, Luca Boeri3.
Abstract
Currently available surgical treatments for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) due to Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO) are associated with an increased risk of sexual dysfunction. The aim of our study is to compare sexual and ejaculatory function after Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate (B-TUEP). We performed a retrospective analysis of data prospectively collected from 62 (44.9%) and 76 (55.1%) patients who underwent HoLEP and B-TUEP, respectively. Erectile function and ejaculation characteristics were assessed with the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain and the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculatory function (MSHQ-EJ) questionnaires. Our study recorded no change in erectile function and no significant difference in rates of preserved antegrade ejaculation after both surgeries. One month after surgery, rates of physical pain/discomfort and perceived decreased physical pleasure during ejaculation were higher in HoLEP than B-TUEP patients (all p < 0.03). Moreover, HoLEP patients were more bothered by their ejaculatory difficulties than B-TUEP men (p = 0.03). At 3- and 12-months follow-up, all ejaculation-related differences disappeared. In conclusion, both procedures are valid alternatives for BPO treatment as they offer comparable urinary and sexual outcomes in the long term. However, in the first month after surgery, HoLEP patients present with more ejaculatory difficulties.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33082545 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-00366-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Impot Res ISSN: 0955-9930 Impact factor: 2.896