Literature DB >> 33082203

Lessons Learned from Setting Up a Prospective, Longitudinal, Multicenter Study with Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer.

Susana I S Patuleia1,2, Sophie C Hagenaars3, Cathy B Moelans1, Margreet G E M Ausems4, Carla H van Gils5, Rob A E M Tollenaar3, Paul J van Diest1, Wilma E Mesker3, Elsken van der Wall6.   

Abstract

Women identified with an increased risk of breast cancer due to mutations in cancer susceptibility genes or a familial history of breast cancer undergo tailored screening with the goal of detecting tumors earlier, when potential curative interventions are still possible. Ideally, screening would identify signs of carcinogenesis even before a tumor is detectable by imaging. This could be achieved by timely signaling of altered biomarker levels for precancerous processes in liquid biopsies. Currently, the Nipple Aspirate Fluid (NAF) and the Trial Early Serum Test BREAST cancer (TESTBREAST), both ongoing, prospective, multicenter studies, are investigating biomarkers in liquid biopsies to improve breast cancer screening in high-risk women. The NAF study focuses on changes over time in miRNA expression levels both in blood and NAF samples, whereas the TESTBREAST study analyzes changes in protein levels in blood samples at sequential interval timepoints. These within-subject changes are studied in relation to later occurrence of breast cancer using a nested case-control design. These longitudinal studies face their own challenges in execution, such as hindrances in logistics and in sample processing that were difficult to anticipate. This article offers insight into those challenges and concurrently aims to provide useful strategies for the set-up of similar studies.See related commentary by Sauter, p. 429. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33082203     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  3 in total

Review 1.  Nipple Aspirate Fluid at a Glance.

Authors:  Susana I S Patuleia; Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk; Elsken van der Wall; Paul J van Diest; Cathy B Moelans
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  The changing microRNA landscape by color and cloudiness: a cautionary tale for nipple aspirate fluid biomarker analysis.

Authors:  Susana I S Patuleia; Elsken van der Wall; Carla H van Gils; Marije F Bakker; Agnes Jager; Marleen M Voorhorst-Ogink; Paul J van Diest; Cathy B Moelans
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 7.051

3.  Patient-centered research: how do women tolerate nipple fluid aspiration as a potential screening tool for breast cancer?

Authors:  Susana I S Patuleia; Cathy B Moelans; Jasmijn Koopman; Julia E C van Steenhoven; Thijs van Dalen; Carmen C van der Pol; Agnes Jager; Margreet G E M Ausems; Paul J van Diest; Elsken van der Wall; Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.638

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.