Literature DB >> 33082201

Collagen Organization in Relation to Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Pathology and Outcomes.

Donald L Weaver1,2, Matthew W Conklin3,4, Brian L Sprague5,1,6, Pamela M Vacek1,7, Sophie E Mulrow8, Mark F Evans1,2, Amy Trentham-Dietz9,10, Sally D Herschorn1,6, Ted A James11, Nuntida Surachaicharn4, Adib Keikhosravi12, Kevin W Eliceiri10,12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is widespread interest in discriminating indolent from aggressive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We sought to evaluate collagen organization in the DCIS tumor microenvironment in relation to pathologic characteristics and patient outcomes.
METHODS: We retrieved fixed tissue specimens for 90 DCIS cases within the population-based Vermont DCIS Cohort. We imaged collagen fibers within 75 μm of the tumor/stromal boundary on hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides using multiphoton microscopy with second-harmonic generation. Automated software quantified collagen fiber length, width, straightness, density, alignment, and angle to the tumor/stroma boundary. Factor analysis identified linear combinations of collagen fiber features representing composite attributes of collagen organization.
RESULTS: Multiple collagen features were associated with DCIS grade, necrosis pattern, or periductal fibrosis (P < 0.05). After adjusting for treatments and nuclear grade, risk of recurrence (defined as any second breast cancer diagnosis) was lower among cases with greater collagen fiber width [hazard ratio (HR), 0.57 per one standard deviation increase; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39-0.84] and fiber density (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42-0.85), whereas risk was elevated among DCIS cases with higher fiber straightness (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.05-2.06) and distance to the nearest two fibers (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.06-2.02). Fiber length, alignment, and fiber angle were not associated with recurrence (P > 0.05). Five composite factors were identified, accounting for 72.4% of the total variability among fibers; three were inversely associated with recurrence (HRs ranging from 0.60 to 0.67; P ≤ 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Multiple aspects of collagen organization around DCIS lesions are associated with recurrence risk. IMPACT: Collagen organization should be considered in the development of prognostic DCIS biomarker signatures. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33082201      PMCID: PMC7855820          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.090


  46 in total

1.  Intraductal carcinoma. Long-term follow-up after treatment by biopsy alone.

Authors:  W L Betsill; P P Rosen; P H Lieberman; G F Robbins
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1978-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Intensity-based registration of bright-field and second-harmonic generation images of histopathology tissue sections.

Authors:  Adib Keikhosravi; Bin Li; Yuming Liu; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Robert F Arao; Brian L Sprague; Janie M Lee; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Louise M Henderson; Tracy Onega; Anna N A Tosteson; Garth H Rauscher; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Friends or foes - bipolar effects of the tumour stroma in cancer.

Authors:  Margareta M Mueller; Norbert E Fusenig
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Breast cancer by proxy: can the microenvironment be both the cause and consequence?

Authors:  Lone Rønnov-Jessen; Mina J Bissell
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 11.951

6.  Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laura Esserman; Yiwey Shieh; Ian Thompson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Weiwei Zhu; Karla Kerlikowske; Brian L Sprague; Tracy Onega; Diana S M Buist; Louise M Henderson; Robert A Smith
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  Collagen architecture in pregnancy-induced protection from breast cancer.

Authors:  Ori Maller; Kirk C Hansen; Traci R Lyons; Irene Acerbi; Valerie M Weaver; Rytis Prekeris; Aik-Choon Tan; Pepper Schedin
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 9.  Breaking through to the Other Side: Microenvironment Contributions to DCIS Initiation and Progression.

Authors:  Andrew C Nelson; Heather L Machado; Kathryn L Schwertfeger
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 10.  Why the stroma matters in breast cancer: insights into breast cancer patient outcomes through the examination of stromal biomarkers.

Authors:  Matthew W Conklin; Patricia J Keely
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.405

View more
  5 in total

1.  Discoidin Domain Receptor 2 Expression as Worse Prognostic Marker in Invasive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Irene Romayor; Marina Luque García-Vaquero; Joana Márquez; Beatriz Arteta; Ramón Barceló; Aitor Benedicto
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.269

2.  Mammary collagen architecture and its association with mammographic density and lesion severity among women undergoing image-guided breast biopsy.

Authors:  Mark E Sherman; Matthew W Conklin; Gretchen L Gierach; Clara Bodelon; Maeve Mullooly; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Shaoqi Fan; Mustapha Abubakar; Petra Lenz; Pamela M Vacek; Donald L Weaver; Sally D Herschorn; Jason M Johnson; Brian L Sprague; Stephen Hewitt; John Shepherd; Serghei Malkov; Patricia J Keely; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 6.466

3.  A pan-cancer analysis of matrisome proteins reveals CTHRC1 and a related network as major ECM regulators across cancers.

Authors:  Keerthi Harikrishnan; Srinivas Sheshagiri Prabhu; Nagaraj Balasubramanian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Sulindac, a Nonselective NSAID, Reduces Breast Density in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Patricia A Thompson; Chuan Huang; Jie Yang; Betsy C Wertheim; Denise Roe; Xiaoyue Zhang; Jie Ding; Pavani Chalasani; Christina Preece; Jessica Martinez; H-H Sherry Chow; Alison T Stopeck
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Transition to invasive breast cancer is associated with progressive changes in the structure and composition of tumor stroma.

Authors:  Tyler Risom; David R Glass; Inna Averbukh; Candace C Liu; Alex Baranski; Adam Kagel; Erin F McCaffrey; Noah F Greenwald; Belén Rivero-Gutiérrez; Siri H Strand; Sushama Varma; Alex Kong; Leeat Keren; Sucheta Srivastava; Chunfang Zhu; Zumana Khair; Deborah J Veis; Katherine Deschryver; Sujay Vennam; Carlo Maley; E Shelley Hwang; Jeffrey R Marks; Sean C Bendall; Graham A Colditz; Robert B West; Michael Angelo
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 41.582

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.