Literature DB >> 33081525

Part 2: Evidence Evaluation and Guidelines Development: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

David J Magid, Khalid Aziz, Adam Cheng, Mary Fran Hazinski, Amber V Hoover, Melissa Mahgoub, Ashish R Panchal, Comilla Sasson, Alexis A Topjian, Amber J Rodriguez, Aaron Donoghue, Katherine M Berg, Henry C Lee, Tia T Raymond, Eric J Lavonas.   

Abstract

The 2020 American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care is based on the extensive evidence evaluation performed in conjunction with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. The Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support, Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support, Neonatal Life Support, Resuscitation Education Science, and Systems of Care Writing Groups drafted, reviewed, and approved recommendations, assigning to each recommendation a Class of Recommendation (ie, strength) and Level of Evidence (ie, quality). The 2020 Guidelines are organized in knowledge chunks that are grouped into discrete modules of information on specific topics or management issues. The 2020 Guidelines underwent blinded peer review by subject matter experts and were also reviewed and approved for publication by the AHA Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee and the AHA Executive Committee. The AHA has rigorous conflict-of-interest policies and procedures to minimize the risk of bias or improper influence during development of the guidelines. Anyone involved in any part of the guideline development process disclosed all commercial relationships and other potential conflicts of interest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AHA Scientific Statements; cardiac arrest; evidence evaluation; resuscitation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33081525     DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  3 in total

1.  Importance of Immediate Electronic-Based Feedback to Enhance Feedback for First-Time CPR Trainees.

Authors:  Patrycja Misztal-Okońska; Krzysztof Goniewicz; Mariusz Goniewicz; Jamie Ranse; Attila J Hertelendy; Lesley Gray; Eric Carlström; Jarle Løwe Sørensen; Amir Khorram-Manesh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Compression depth of 30 mm has similar efficacy and fewer complications versus 50 mm during mechanical chest compression with miniaturized chest compressor in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Lian Liang; Zuyong Li; Ran Chen; Siqi Liu; Tianen Zhou; Longyuan Jiang; Wanchun Tang; Jun Jiang; Zhengfei Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Direct Transport to Cardiac Arrest Center and Survival Outcomes after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest by Urbanization Level.

Authors:  Eujene Jung; Young Sun Ro; Jeong Ho Park; Hyun Ho Ryu; Sang Do Shin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.