Stephen W Patrick1, James C Slaughter2, Frank E Harrell2, Peter R Martin3, Katherine Hartmann4, Judith Dudley5, Shannon Stratton5, William O Cooper6. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Mildred Stahlman Division of Neonatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. Electronic address: stephen.patrick@vanderbilt.edu. 2. Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 5. Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate clinical risk prediction tools for neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). STUDY DESIGN: We developed prediction models for NAS based on a set of 30 demographic and antenatal exposure covariates collected during pregnancy. Data (outpatient prescription, vital, and administrative records), were obtained from enrollees in the Tennessee Medicaid Program from 2009 to 2014. Models were created using logistic regression and backward selection based on improvement in the Akaike information criterion, and internally validated using bootstrap cross-validation. RESULTS: A total of 218 020 maternal and infant dyads met inclusion criteria, of whom 3208 infants were diagnosed with NAS. The general population model included age, hepatitis C virus infection, days of opioid used by type, number of cigarettes used daily, and the following medications used in the last 30 day of pregnancy: bupropion, antinausea medicines, benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, and gabapentin. Infant characteristics included birthweight, small for gestational age, and infant sex. A high-risk model used a smaller number of predictive variables. Both models discriminated well with an area under the curve of 0.89 and were well-calibrated for low-risk infants. CONCLUSIONS: We developed 2 predictive models for NAS based on demographics and antenatal exposure during the last 30 days of pregnancy that were able to risk stratify infants at risk of developing the syndrome.
OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate clinical risk prediction tools for neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). STUDY DESIGN: We developed prediction models for NAS based on a set of 30 demographic and antenatal exposure covariates collected during pregnancy. Data (outpatient prescription, vital, and administrative records), were obtained from enrollees in the Tennessee Medicaid Program from 2009 to 2014. Models were created using logistic regression and backward selection based on improvement in the Akaike information criterion, and internally validated using bootstrap cross-validation. RESULTS: A total of 218 020 maternal and infant dyads met inclusion criteria, of whom 3208 infants were diagnosed with NAS. The general population model included age, hepatitis C virus infection, days of opioid used by type, number of cigarettes used daily, and the following medications used in the last 30 day of pregnancy: bupropion, antinausea medicines, benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, and gabapentin. Infant characteristics included birthweight, small for gestational age, and infant sex. A high-risk model used a smaller number of predictive variables. Both models discriminated well with an area under the curve of 0.89 and were well-calibrated for low-risk infants. CONCLUSIONS: We developed 2 predictive models for NAS based on demographics and antenatal exposure during the last 30 days of pregnancy that were able to risk stratify infants at risk of developing the syndrome.
Authors: Ashley A Leech; William O Cooper; Elizabeth McNeer; Theresa A Scott; Stephen W Patrick Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: William O Cooper; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Patrick G Arbogast; Judith A Dudley; Shannon Dyer; Patricia S Gideon; Kathi Hall; Wayne A Ray Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-06-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stephen W Patrick; Robert E Schumacher; Brian D Benneyworth; Elizabeth E Krans; Jennifer M McAllister; Matthew M Davis Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Karol Kaltenbach; Amber M Holbrook; Mara G Coyle; Sarah H Heil; Amy L Salisbury; Susan M Stine; Peter R Martin; Hendrée E Jones Journal: Addiction Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Catherine Anne Fullerton; Meelee Kim; Cindy Parks Thomas; D Russell Lyman; Leslie B Montejano; Richard H Dougherty; Allen S Daniels; Sushmita Shoma Ghose; Miriam E Delphin-Rittmon Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Shawana Bibi; Nathan Gaddis; Eric O Johnson; Barry M Lester; Walter Kraft; Rachana Singh; Norma Terrin; Susan Adeniyi-Jones; Jonathan M Davis Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 3.953
Authors: Ludmila N Bakhireva; Rajesh C Miranda; Amanda H Mahnke; Melissa H Roberts; Lawrence Leeman; Xingya Ma Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 4.379