Literature DB >> 33080007

Morphologic remission status is limited compared to ΔN flow cytometry: a Children's Oncology Group AAML0531 report.

Lisa Eidenschink Brodersen1, Robert B Gerbing2, M Laura Pardo1,3, Todd A Alonzo2,4, Dana Paine1, Wayne Fritschle1, Fan-Chi Hsu1, Jessica A Pollard5,6, Richard Aplenc7, Samir B Kahwash8, Betsy Hirsch9, Susana Ramondi10, Denise Wells1, E Anders Kolb2,11, Alan S Gamis12, Soheil Meshinchi2,3, Michael R Loken1.   

Abstract

Risk stratification for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) uses molecular and cytogenetic abnormalities identified at diagnosis. Response to therapy informs risk, and morphology continues to be used more frequently than flow cytometry. Herein, the largest cohort of pediatric patients prospectively assessed for measurable residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry (N = 784) is reported. The "difference from normal" (ΔN) technique was applied: 31% of all patients tested positive (AML range, 0.02% to 91%) after the first course of treatment on Children's Oncology Group study AAML0531. Detection of MRD following initial chemotherapy proved the strongest predicator of overall survival (OS) in univariable and multivariable analyses, and was predictive of relapse risk, disease-free survival, and treatment-related mortality. Clearance of MRD after a second round of chemotherapy did not improve survival. The morphologic definition of persistent disease (>15% AML) failed 27% of the time; those identified as MRD- had superior outcomes. Similarly, for patients not achieving morphologic remission (>5% blasts), 36% of patients were MRD- and had favorable outcomes compared with those who were MRD+ (P < .001); hence an increase in myeloid progenitor cells can be favorable when ΔN classifies them as phenotypically normal. Furthermore, ΔN reclassified 20% of patients in morphologic remission as having detectable MRD with comparable poor outcomes. Retrospective analysis using the relapse phenotype as a template demonstrated that 96% of MRD- patients had <0.02% of the relapse immunophenotype in their end of induction 1 marrow. Thus, the detection of abnormal myeloid progenitor cells by ΔN is both specific and sensitive, with a high predictive signal identifiable early in treatment. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00372593.
© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33080007      PMCID: PMC7594384          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


  38 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring minimal residual disease in acute leukemia: Technical challenges and interpretive complexities.

Authors:  Xueyan Chen; Brent L Wood
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 8.250

2.  Prognostic significance of flow-cytometry evaluation of minimal residual disease in children with acute myeloid leukaemia treated according to the AIEOP-AML 2002/01 study protocol.

Authors:  Barbara Buldini; Frida Rizzati; Riccardo Masetti; Franca Fagioli; Giuseppe Menna; Concetta Micalizzi; Maria Caterina Putti; Carmelo Rizzari; Nicola Santoro; Marco Zecca; Silvia Disarò; Roberto Rondelli; Pietro Merli; Martina Pigazzi; Andrea Pession; Franco Locatelli; Giuseppe Basso
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 3.  Tumor heterogeneity makes AML a "moving target" for detection of residual disease.

Authors:  W Zeijlemaker; J W Gratama; G J Schuurhuis
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.058

4.  Flow cytometric scoring system as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Sung-Chao Chu; Tso-Fu Wang; Chi-Cheng Li; Ruey-Ho Kao; Dian-Kun Li; Yu-Chieh Su; Denise A Wells; Michael R Loken
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.156

5.  Clinical significance of flowcytometric minimal residual disease detection in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia patients treated according to the DCOG ANLL97/MRC AML12 protocol.

Authors:  V H J van der Velden; A van der Sluijs-Geling; B E S Gibson; J G te Marvelde; P G Hoogeveen; W C J Hop; K Wheatley; M B Bierings; G J Schuurhuis; S S N de Graaf; E R van Wering; J J M van Dongen
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; John M Bennett; Kenneth J Kopecky; Thomas Büchner; Cheryl L Willman; Elihu H Estey; Charles A Schiffer; Hartmut Doehner; Martin S Tallman; T Andrew Lister; Francesco Lo-Coco; Roel Willemze; Andrea Biondi; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Richard A Larson; Bob Löwenberg; Miguel A Sanz; David R Head; Ryuzo Ohno; Clara D Bloomfield; Francesco LoCocco
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Prevalence and prognostic implications of CEBPA mutations in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Phoenix A Ho; Todd A Alonzo; Robert B Gerbing; Jessica Pollard; Derek L Stirewalt; Craig Hurwitz; Nyla A Heerema; Betsy Hirsch; Susana C Raimondi; Beverly Lange; Janet L Franklin; Jerald P Radich; Soheil Meshinchi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Bortezomib with standard chemotherapy for children with acute myeloid leukemia does not improve treatment outcomes: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Richard Aplenc; Soheil Meshinchi; Lillian Sung; Todd Alonzo; John Choi; Brian Fisher; Robert Gerbing; Betsy Hirsch; Terzah Horton; Samir Kahwash; John Levine; Michael Loken; Lisa Brodersen; Jessica Pollard; Susana Raimondi; Edward Anders Kolb; Alan Gamis
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 9.  Flow-Cytometric Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease in Pediatric Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Recent Advances and Future Strategies.

Authors:  Barbara Buldini; Margarita Maurer-Granofszky; Elena Varotto; Michael N Dworzak
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.418

10.  Consistent quantitative gene product expression: #3. Invariance with age.

Authors:  Michael R Loken; Andrew P Voigt; Lisa Eidenschink Brodersen; Wayne Fritschle; Andrew J Menssen; Denise A Wells
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.355

View more
  4 in total

1.  Blood Count Recovery Following Induction Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Children Does Not Predict Survival.

Authors:  Lauren Pommert; Todd M Cooper; Robert B Gerbing; Lisa Brodersen; Michael Loken; Alan Gamis; Richard Aplenc; Todd A Alonzo; Edward Anders Kolb
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 2.  Measurable Residual Disease in High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Thomas Cluzeau; Roberto M Lemoli; James McCloskey; Todd Cooper
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  High-dose AraC is essential for the treatment of ML-DS independent of postinduction MRD: results of the COG AAML1531 trial.

Authors:  Johann Hitzler; Todd Alonzo; Robert Gerbing; Amy Beckman; Betsy Hirsch; Susana Raimondi; Karen Chisholm; Shelton Viola; Lisa Brodersen; Michael Loken; Spencer Tong; Todd Druley; Maureen O'Brien; Nobuko Hijiya; Amy Heerema-McKenney; Yi-Chang Wang; Reuven Schore; Jeffrey Taub; Alan Gamis; E Anders Kolb; Jason N Berman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Survival Following Relapse in Children with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Report from AML-BFM and COG.

Authors:  Mareike Rasche; Martin Zimmermann; Emma Steidel; Todd Alonzo; Richard Aplenc; Jean-Pierre Bourquin; Heidrun Boztug; Todd Cooper; Alan S Gamis; Robert B Gerbing; Iveta Janotova; Jan-Henning Klusmann; Thomas Lehrnbecher; Nora Mühlegger; Nils V Neuhoff; Naghmeh Niktoreh; Lucie Sramkova; Jan Stary; Katharina Waack; Christiane Walter; Ursula Creutzig; Michael Dworzak; Gertjan Kaspers; Edward Anders Kolb; Dirk Reinhardt
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.