Charles Philip Gabel1, Hamid Reza Mokhtarinia2,3, Markus Melloh4,5,6. 1. Access Physiotherapy, Coolum Beach, QLD, Australia. 2. Department of Ergonomics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 3. Department of Physiotherapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 4. Zurich University of Applied Sciences, School of Health Professions, Institute of Health Sciences, Winterthur. 5. The University of Western Australia, UWA Medical School, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia. 6. Curtin University, Curtin Medical School, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of the literature. OBJECTIVE: To update recent trends in the use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) analysis for CLBP. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The lumbar multifidus (MF) muscle has drawn sustained interest for some time, particularly related to its structure, role in spinal stability, and its association and clinical significance with CLBP. Additionally, the presence of MF-arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) and its relation to induced CLBP, through depleted lumbar stabilization, has gained increased recognition. In contrast, the differential diagnostic use of MRS analysis has suggested specific links between the presence of MF myo-cellular lipid (MCL) infiltration and CLBP patients. METHODS: Review of the literature related to CLBP with the keywords MCL, MRS analysis, and MF-AMI. RESULTS: No articles discussed CLBP using the three key concepts in a single context. The use of MRS analysis has the capacity to distinguish between Extra-MCL (EMCL) and intra-MCL (IMCL) infiltration within the lumbar MF. It is suggested that EMCLs are more likely to be associated with age-related change, while the IMCLs appear more likely to be associated with the presence of CLBP. The increased recognition of MF-AMI as a primary cause of CLBP, and the potential that AMI parallels the presence of IMCLs, facilitates possible use of MRS as a means to quantify the basis of lumbar MF-AMI CLBP, and that proportional IMCL changes in the MF could serve as a 'proxy' to indicate the effectiveness of interventions directed at MF activation. CONCLUSIONS: It may be possible for IMCLs to serve as a 'proxy' prognostic marker of lumbar MF-AMI in CLBP patients. Further, if this assertion were correct, then reductions in IMCLs could potentially quantify recovery and the efficacy of rehabilitation management strategies directed at lumbar MF activation.Level of Evidence: 5.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of the literature. OBJECTIVE: To update recent trends in the use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) analysis for CLBP. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The lumbar multifidus (MF) muscle has drawn sustained interest for some time, particularly related to its structure, role in spinal stability, and its association and clinical significance with CLBP. Additionally, the presence of MF-arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) and its relation to induced CLBP, through depleted lumbar stabilization, has gained increased recognition. In contrast, the differential diagnostic use of MRS analysis has suggested specific links between the presence of MF myo-cellular lipid (MCL) infiltration and CLBP patients. METHODS: Review of the literature related to CLBP with the keywords MCL, MRS analysis, and MF-AMI. RESULTS: No articles discussed CLBP using the three key concepts in a single context. The use of MRS analysis has the capacity to distinguish between Extra-MCL (EMCL) and intra-MCL (IMCL) infiltration within the lumbar MF. It is suggested that EMCLs are more likely to be associated with age-related change, while the IMCLs appear more likely to be associated with the presence of CLBP. The increased recognition of MF-AMI as a primary cause of CLBP, and the potential that AMI parallels the presence of IMCLs, facilitates possible use of MRS as a means to quantify the basis of lumbar MF-AMI CLBP, and that proportional IMCL changes in the MF could serve as a 'proxy' to indicate the effectiveness of interventions directed at MF activation. CONCLUSIONS: It may be possible for IMCLs to serve as a 'proxy' prognostic marker of lumbar MF-AMI in CLBP patients. Further, if this assertion were correct, then reductions in IMCLs could potentially quantify recovery and the efficacy of rehabilitation management strategies directed at lumbar MF activation.Level of Evidence: 5.