Literature DB >> 33079864

First-Year Results of the American Board of Anesthesiology's Objective Structured Clinical Examination for Initial Certification.

David O Warner1, Cynthia A Lien2, Ting Wang3, Yan Zhou3, Robert S Isaak4, Cathleen Peterson-Layne5, Ann E Harman3, Alex Macario6, Robert R Gaiser7, Santhanam Suresh8, Deborah J Culley9, James P Rathmell9, Mark T Keegan1, Daniel J Cole10, Brenda G Fahy11, Rupa J Dainer12, Huaping Sun3.   

Abstract

In 2018, the American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) became the first US medical specialty certifying board to incorporate an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) into its initial certification examination system. Previously, the ABA's staged examination system consisted of 2 written examinations (the BASIC and ADVANCED examinations) and the Standardized Oral Examination (SOE). The OSCE and the existing SOE are now 2 separate components of the APPLIED Examination. This report presents the results of the first-year OSCE administration. A total of 1410 candidates took both the OSCE and the SOE in 2018. Candidate performance approximated a normal distribution for both the OSCE and the SOE, and was not associated with the timing of the examination, including day of the week, morning versus afternoon session, and order of the OSCE and the SOE. Practice-based Learning and Improvement was the most difficult station, while Application of Ultrasonography was the least difficult. The correlation coefficient between SOE and OSCE scores was 0.35 ([95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.30-0.39]; P < .001). Scores for the written ADVANCED Examination were modestly correlated with scores for the SOE (r = 0.29 [95% CI, 0.25-0.34]; P < .001) and the OSCE (r = 0.15 [95% CI, 0.10-0.20]; P < .001). Most of the candidates who failed the SOE passed the OSCE, and most of the candidates who failed the OSCE passed the SOE. Of the 1410 candidates, 77 (5.5%) failed the OSCE, 155 (11.0%) failed the SOE, and 25 (1.8%) failed both. Thus, 207 (14.7%) failed at least 1 component of the APPLIED Examination. Adding an OSCE to a board certification examination system is feasible. Preliminary evidence indicates that the OSCE measures aspects of candidate abilities distinct from those measured by other examinations used for initial board certification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33079864     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  3 in total

1.  Resident Preparation for the American Board of Anesthesiology Objective Standardized Clinical Examination: A Comparison of Virtual Telesimulation With In-person Simulation.

Authors:  Christina Miller; Serkan Toy; Deborah Schwengel; Stefani Schwartz; Adam Schiavi
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2021-07-01

2.  Effective methods to enhance medical students' cardioversion and transcutaneous cardiac pacing skills retention - a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  Christian Kowalski; Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Sigrid Harendza
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.263

3.  US Residents' Perspectives on the Introduction, Conduct, and Value of American Board of Anesthesiology's Objective Structured Clinical Examination-Results of the 1st Nationwide Questionnaire Survey.

Authors:  Basavana Goudra; Arjun Guthal
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2021-08-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.