| Literature DB >> 33079621 |
Rebecca A Madden1, Daniel L McCartney2, Rosie M Walker2,3, Robert F Hillary2, Mairead L Bermingham2, Konrad Rawlik4, Stewart W Morris2, Archie Campbell2, David J Porteous2,3, Ian J Deary3,5, Kathryn L Evans2,3, Jonathan Hafferty1, Andrew M McIntosh1,2,3, Riccardo E Marioni2,3.
Abstract
The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) theory predicts that prenatal and early life events shape adult health outcomes. Birth weight is a useful indicator of the foetal experience and has been associated with multiple adult health outcomes. DNA methylation (DNAm) is one plausible mechanism behind the relationship of birth weight to adult health. Through data linkage between Generation Scotland and historic Scottish birth cohorts, and birth records held through the NHS Information and Statistics Division, a sample of 1,757 individuals with available birth weight and DNAm data was derived. Epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) were performed in two independently generated DNAm subgroups (nSet1 = 1,395, nSet2 = 362), relating adult DNAm from whole blood to birth weight. Meta-analysis yielded one genome-wide significant CpG site (p = 5.97x10-9), cg00966482. There was minimal evidence for attenuation of the effect sizes for the lead loci upon adjustment for numerous potential confounder variables (body mass index, educational attainment, and socioeconomic status). Associations between birth weight and epigenetic measures of biological age were also assessed. Associations between lower birth weight and higher Grim Age acceleration (p(FDR) = 3.6x10-3) and shorter DNAm-derived telomere length (p(FDR) = 1.7x10-3) are described, although results for three other epigenetic clocks were null. Our results provide support for an association between birth weight and DNAm both locally at one CpG site, and globally via biological ageing estimates.Entities:
Keywords: DNA methylation; EWAS; Generation Scotland; birth weight; depression
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33079621 PMCID: PMC8216207 DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2020.1827713
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epigenetics ISSN: 1559-2294 Impact factor: 4.861
Figure 1.Inclusion flow diagram detailing the selection of samples for the current study
Population characteristics of the Set 1 and Set 2 EWAS samples
| Phenotype Sample | EWAS Sample | Replication Sample | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 4, 710 | 29.5 | 10.9 | 1, 395 | 37.1 | 14.7 | 362 | 25.8 | 5.2 |
| Birthweight (g) | 4, 710 | 3, 399 | 516 | 1, 395 | 3, 377 | 518 | 362 | 3, 421 | 535.4 |
| Gestation (weeks) | 4, 710 | 39.8 | 1.7 | 1, 395 | 40 | 1.8 | 362 | 39.7 | 1.5 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 4, 385 | 25.2 | 5.2 | 1, 387 | 26.1 | 5.4 | 360 | 24.9 | 4.8 |
| Education* | 4, 411 | 5 | 4–6 | 1, 317 | 5 | 4–6 | 350 | 5 | 4–6 |
| Sex – Male | 2, 025 | 43 | 569 | 40.8 | 160 | 44.2 | |||
| Female | 2, 688 | 57 | 826 | 59.2 | 202 | 55.8 | |||
| Socieconomic Status** | |||||||||
| Quintile 1 (most deprived) | 621 | 14.2 | 207 | 15.8 | 65 | 19.3 | |||
| Quintile 2 | 717 | 16.3 | 210 | 16 | 57 | 16.9 | |||
| Quintile 3 | 715 | 16.3 | 183 | 14 | 62 | 18.4 | |||
| Quintile 4 | 1, 064 | 24.2 | 301 | 23 | 72 | 21.4 | |||
| Quintile 5 (least deprived) | 1, 272 | 29 | 409 | 31.2 | 81 | 24 | |||
| Smoking | |||||||||
| Current Smoker | 918 | 20.3 | 257 | 19.1 | 88 | 24.6 | |||
| Ex-Smoker (<12 months) | 237 | 5.2 | 56 | 4.2 | 26 | 7.3 | |||
| Ex-Smoker (>12 months) | 662 | 14.6 | 273 | 20.3 | 48 | 13.4 | |||
| Never Smoker | 2, 708 | 59.8 | 758 | 56.4 | 195 | 54.6 | |||
* Median and Interquartile range reported. Education was coded as an ordinal variable: 0 = 0 yrs, 1 = 1–4 yrs, 2 = 5–9 yrs, 3 = 10–11 yrs, 4 = 12–13 yrs, 5 = 14–15 yrs, 6 = 16–17 yrs, 7 = 18–19 yrs, 8 = 20–21 yrs, 9 = 22–23 yrs, 10 = ≥24 yrs.
**SIMD Quintile. SIMD is the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation, a postcode-derived index of socioeconomic status. The quintiles derived on the full Generation Scotland cohort ranged from 1 (most deprived) to 5 (least deprived).
Figure 2.Manhattan plots for the set 1 epigenome-wide association study of birth weight (a); the set 2 sample EWAS (b); and the meta-analysis EWAS (c). The black and red lines represent the suggestive, and genome-wide significant p-value thresholds of P = 1x10−5 and 3.6x10−8, respectively
Figure 3.Effect sizes for 18 of the top 19 CpG sites in the set 1 sample plotted against the effect sizes in the set 2 sample (cg04988918 did not pass quality control in the set 2 array). The point size is determined by the -log10 of the p-values for these hits in the set 2 analysis. The two points labelled in black are the two CpG sites which achieved nominal significance in the set 2 study, and the three highlighted in red are the three co-methylated CpG sites within the CASZ1 gene
Figure 4.Correlation plot between methylation at the top 36 CpG sites from the meta-analysis EWAS. The shade and scale of the dots represent the magnitude and direction of the correlation between pairs of CpGs
Figure 5.Effect sizes for the main meta-analysis EWAS, and the fully-adjusted sensitivity analysis model. The hollow point labelled in black is cg00966482, in the HERV-FRD/SMIM13 gene which achieved epigenome-wide significance in the main model meta-analysis. The points in red are in the four CpG sites in the gene CASZ1 which had p < 1x10−5 in the meta-analysis EWAS
Outputs of linear regression models between birth weight residuals and five epigenetic signatures of accelerated biological ageing – Horvath (Intrinsic Epigenetic Age Acceleration; IEAA), Hannum, PhenoAge, GrimAge, and DNAmTL
| Clock | Standardised Beta | SE | P | P.adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horvath | 3.2x10−3 | 0.025 | 0.90 | 0.90 |
| Hannum | −6.2x10−3 | 0.027 | 0.82 | 0.90 |
| GrimAge | −0.083 | 0.026 | 1.4x10−3 | 3.6x10−3 |
| PhenoAge | −0.042 | 0.027 | 0.12 | 0.20 |
| DNAmTL | 0.098 | 0.027 | 3.3x10−4 | 1.7x10−3 |