Literature DB >> 33078998

Comparison of Whole-Body MRI, CT, and Bone Scintigraphy for Response Evaluation of Cancer Therapeutics in Metastatic Breast Cancer to Bone.

Michael Kosmin1, Anwar R Padhani1, Andrew Gogbashian1, David Woolf1, Mei-Lin Ah-See1, Peter Ostler1, Stephanie Sutherland1, David Miles1, Jillian Noble1, Dow-Mu Koh1, Andrea Marshall1, Janet Dunn1, Andreas Makris1.   

Abstract

Background CT and bone scintigraphy have limitations in evaluating systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) response in bone metastases from metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Purpose To evaluate whether whole-body MRI enables identification of progressive disease (PD) earlier than CT and bone scintigraphy in bone-only MBC. Materials and Methods This prospective study evaluated participants with bone-only MBC between May 2016 and January 2019 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03266744). Participants were enrolled at initiation of first or subsequent SACT based on standard CT and bone scintigraphy imaging. Baseline whole-body MRI was performed within 2 weeks of entry; those with extraosseous disease were excluded. CT and whole-body MRI were performed every 12 weeks until definitive PD was evident with one or both modalities. In case of PD, bone scintigraphy was used to assess for bone disease progression. Radiologists independently interpreted images from CT, whole-body MRI, or bone scintigraphy and were blinded to results with the other modalities. Systematic differences in performance between modalities were analyzed by using the McNemar test. Results Forty-five participants (mean age, 60 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; all women) were evaluated. Median time on study was 36 weeks (range, 1-120 weeks). Two participants were excluded because of unequivocal evidence of liver metastases at baseline whole-body MRI, two participants were excluded because they had clinical progression before imaging showed PD, and one participant was lost to follow-up. Of the 33 participants with PD at imaging, 67% (22 participants) had PD evident at whole-body MRI only and 33% (11 participants) had PD at CT and whole-body MRI concurrently; none had PD at CT only (P < .001, McNemar test). There was only slight agreement between whole-body MRI and CT (Cohen κ, 0.15). PD at bone scintigraphy was reported in 50% of participants (13 of 26) with bone progression at CT and/or whole-body MRI (P < .001, McNemar test). Conclusion Whole-body MRI enabled identification of progressive disease before CT in most participants with bone-only metastatic breast cancer. Progressive disease at bone scintigraphy was evident in only half of participants with bone progression at whole-body MRI. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33078998     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020192683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

Review 1.  Whole body imaging in musculoskeletal oncology: when, why, and how.

Authors:  Joao R T Vicentini; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  A review on the added value of whole-body MRI in metastatic lobular breast cancer.

Authors:  Basrull N Bhaludin; Nina Tunariu; Dow-Mu Koh; Christina Messiou; Alicia F Okines; Sophie E McGrath; Alistair E Ring; Marina M Parton; Bhupinder Sharma; Tanja Gagliardi; Steven D Allen; Romney Pope; Stephen R D Johnston; Kate Downey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 7.034

3.  Does the addition of whole-body MRI to routine imaging influence real-world treatment decisions in metastatic breast cancer?

Authors:  Kate Downey; Dow-Mu Koh; Basrull N Bhaludin; Nina Tunariu; Nishanthi Senthivel; Amna Babiker; Neil D Soneji; Nabil Hujairi; Bhupinder Sharma; Sophie E McGrath; Alicia F Okines; Alistair E Ring; Christina Messiou
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 5.605

Review 4.  Lipid metabolism within the bone micro-environment is closely associated with bone metabolism in physiological and pathophysiological stages.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Heng Wang; Yuancheng Li; Lei Song
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 5.  Review of imaging techniques for evaluating morphological and functional responses to the treatment of bone metastases in prostate and breast cancer.

Authors:  J Orcajo-Rincon; J Muñoz-Langa; J M Sepúlveda-Sánchez; G C Fernández-Pérez; M Martínez; E Noriega-Álvarez; S Sanz-Viedma; J C Vilanova; A Luna
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 3.340

6.  Effects of Sex and Age on Fat Fraction, Diffusion-Weighted Image Signal Intensity and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in the Bone Marrow of Asymptomatic Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Whole-Body MRI Study.

Authors:  Alberto Colombo; Luca Bombelli; Paul E Summers; Giulia Saia; Fabio Zugni; Giulia Marvaso; Robert Grimm; Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Anwar R Padhani; Giuseppe Petralia
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.