Literature DB >> 33078849

Role of diversification rates and evolutionary history as a driver of plant naturalization success.

Bernd Lenzner1, Susana Magallón2, Wayne Dawson3, Holger Kreft4,5, Christian König4,6, Jan Pergl7, Petr Pyšek7,8,9, Patrick Weigelt4, Mark van Kleunen10,11, Marten Winter12, Stefan Dullinger1, Franz Essl1.   

Abstract

Human introductions of species beyond their natural ranges and their subsequent establishment are defining features of global environmental change. However, naturalized plants are not uniformly distributed across phylogenetic lineages, with some families contributing disproportionately more to the global alien species pool than others. Additionally, lineages differ in diversification rates, and high diversification rates have been associated with characteristics that increase species naturalization success. Here, we investigate the role of diversification rates in explaining the naturalization success of angiosperm plant families. We use five global data sets that include native and alien plant species distribution, horticultural use of plants, and a time-calibrated angiosperm phylogeny. Using phylogenetic generalized linear mixed models, we analysed the effect of diversification rate, different geographical range measures, and horticultural use on the naturalization success of plant families. We show that a family's naturalization success is positively associated with its evolutionary history, native range size, and economic use. Investigating interactive effects of these predictors shows that native range size and geographic distribution additionally affect naturalization success. High diversification rates and large ranges increase naturalization success, especially of temperate families. We suggest this may result from lower ecological specialization in temperate families with large ranges, compared with tropical families with smaller ranges.
© 2020 The Authors New Phytologist © 2020 New Phytologist Foundation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alien species; evolution; geographic distribution; invasion success; plant naturalization; range size

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33078849      PMCID: PMC7894487          DOI: 10.1111/nph.17014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  64 in total

1.  Reconciling molecular phylogenies with the fossil record.

Authors:  Hélène Morlon; Todd L Parsons; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The horticultural trade and ornamental plant invasions in Britain.

Authors:  Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz; Julia Touza; Charles Perrings; Mark Williamson
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 3.  Legume evolution: where do nodules and mycorrhizas fit in?

Authors:  Janet I Sprent; Euan K James
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Plant species radiations: where, when, why?

Authors:  Hans Peter Linder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Mammalian phylogeny reveals recent diversification rate shifts.

Authors:  Tanja Stadler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  The changing role of ornamental horticulture in alien plant invasions.

Authors:  Mark van Kleunen; Franz Essl; Jan Pergl; Giuseppe Brundu; Marta Carboni; Stefan Dullinger; Regan Early; Pablo González-Moreno; Quentin J Groom; Philip E Hulme; Christoph Kueffer; Ingolf Kühn; Cristina Máguas; Noëlie Maurel; Ana Novoa; Madalin Parepa; Petr Pyšek; Hanno Seebens; Rob Tanner; Julia Touza; Laura Verbrugge; Ewald Weber; Wayne Dawson; Holger Kreft; Patrick Weigelt; Marten Winter; Günther Klonner; Matthew V Talluto; Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2018-03-05

7.  Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny.

Authors:  Stephen A Smith; Joseph W Brown
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.844

8.  Taxonomic bias in biodiversity data and societal preferences.

Authors:  Julien Troudet; Philippe Grandcolas; Amandine Blin; Régine Vignes-Lebbe; Frédéric Legendre
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  An Ecoregion-Based Approach to Protecting Half the Terrestrial Realm.

Authors:  Eric Dinerstein; David Olson; Anup Joshi; Carly Vynne; Neil D Burgess; Eric Wikramanayake; Nathan Hahn; Suzanne Palminteri; Prashant Hedao; Reed Noss; Matt Hansen; Harvey Locke; Erle C Ellis; Benjamin Jones; Charles Victor Barber; Randy Hayes; Cyril Kormos; Vance Martin; Eileen Crist; Wes Sechrest; Lori Price; Jonathan E M Baillie; Don Weeden; Kierán Suckling; Crystal Davis; Nigel Sizer; Rebecca Moore; David Thau; Tanya Birch; Peter Potapov; Svetlana Turubanova; Alexandra Tyukavina; Nadia de Souza; Lilian Pintea; José C Brito; Othman A Llewellyn; Anthony G Miller; Annette Patzelt; Shahina A Ghazanfar; Jonathan Timberlake; Heinz Klöser; Yara Shennan-Farpón; Roeland Kindt; Jens-Peter Barnekow Lillesø; Paulo van Breugel; Lars Graudal; Maianna Voge; Khalaf F Al-Shammari; Muhammad Saleem
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 8.589

10.  C4 photosynthesis promoted species diversification during the Miocene grassland expansion.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Spriggs; Pascal-Antoine Christin; Erika J Edwards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ecological and biogeographic drivers of biodiversity cannot be resolved using clade age-richness data.

Authors:  Daniel L Rabosky; Roger B J Benson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 14.919

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.