Literature DB >> 33078518

Long-Term Effects of Self-Administered Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Episodic Migraine Prevention: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Heiko Pohl1, Marius Moisa2, Hans-H Jung1, Kathrin Brenner3, Jessica Aschmann3, Franz Riederer1,4, Christian C Ruff2, Jean Schoenen5, Roger Luechinger6, Lukas Widmer1, Jens A Petersen7, Andreas R Gantenbein1,8, Peter S Sandor1,8, Lars Michels3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a multifactorial neurovascular disorder, which affects about 12% of the general population. In episodic migraine, the visual cortex revealed abnormal processing, most likely due to decreased preactivation level. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is able to modify cortical excitability and might result in an alleviation of migraine occurrence if used repetitively.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that self-administered anodal tDCS over the visual cortex significantly decreases the number of monthly migraine days in episodic migraine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was single-blind, randomized, and sham-controlled. Inclusion criteria were age 18-80 years and an ICHD-3 diagnosis of episodic migraine. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, presence of a neurodegenerative disorder, a contraindication against MRI examinations, and less than two migraine days during the 28-day baseline period. Patients in whom the baseline period suggested chronic migraine were excluded. After baseline, participants applied daily either verum (anodal-1 mA to 20 min) or sham tDCS (anodal-1 mA to 30 sec) at Oz (reference Cz electrode) for 28 days. Headache diaries were used to record the number of migraine days at baseline, during the stimulation period, and during four subsequent 28-day periods.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were included; two were excluded after the baseline period because less than two migraine days occurred; three were excluded because their headache diaries suggested the diagnosis of chronic migraine. Twenty-three datasets were taken for further analysis. Compared to sham tDCS (n = 12), verum tDCS (n = 11) resulted in a lower number of migraine days (p = 0.010) across all follow-up periods. We found no significant change in total headache days (p = 0.165), anxiety (p = 0.884), or depression scores (p = 0.535). No serious adverse events occurred; minor side effects were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides Class II evidence that self-administered anodal tDCS over the visual cortex in episodic migraine results in a significantly lower number of monthly migraine days. However, it has neither an immediate nor a long-term effect.
© 2020 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hyperexcitability; migraine; migraine days; neuromodulation; neurostimulation; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33078518     DOI: 10.1111/ner.13292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  5 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Monoclonal Antibodies Acting on the CGRP as a Combined Treatment for Migraine (TACTIC): Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Raffaele Ornello; Chiara Rosignoli; Valeria Caponnetto; Francesca Pistoia; Michele Ferrara; Aurora D'Atri; Simona Sacco
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation for migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Peiwei Hong; Yao Liu; Yang Wan; Hai Xiong; Yanming Xu
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 7.035

3.  Structural brain network characteristics in patients with episodic and chronic migraine.

Authors:  Lars Michels; Nabin Koirala; Franz Riederer; Muthuraman Muthuraman; Sergiu Groppa; Roger Luechinger; Andreas R Gantenbein; Peter S Sandor; Spyros Kollias
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 4.  Which is the best transcranial direct current stimulation protocol for migraine prevention? A systematic review and critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Raffaele Ornello; Valeria Caponnetto; Susanna Ratti; Giulia D'Aurizio; Chiara Rosignoli; Francesca Pistoia; Michele Ferrara; Simona Sacco; Aurora D'Atri
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 7.277

5.  Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yu-Chen Cheng; Bing-Yan Zeng; Chao-Ming Hung; Kuan-Pin Su; Yi-Cheng Wu; Yu-Kang Tu; Pao-Yen Lin; Brendon Stubbs; Andre F Carvalho; Chih-Sung Liang; Tien-Yu Chen; Chih-Wei Hsu; Andre R Brunoni; Mein-Woei Suen; Yow-Ling Shiue; Ping-Tao Tseng; Ming-Kung Wu; Cheng-Ta Li
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 7.277

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.